Hope you keep saying that if/when prices rise, people get laid off, the economy slowing down & a drop in the Canadian dollar if/when 25% across-the-board tariffs hit - or will all that be Trudeau's fault?
Except Freeland just countered that with what she wrote in her letter. She seemingly has positioned herself as a centrist with that. She literally disagreed with the policies and said they were wrong and got a standing ovation from a lot of caucus members.
Does it resonate? Time will tell. It did not go unnoticed though.
this is what i wonder about as wellI’m not sure the LPC actually thinks that they need a different policy direction. I suspect the internal thinking is more along the lines of Trudeau as a personality being the liability vs the LPC policies.
There has been minimal conversation about the policies being wrong from the LPC caucus. Most LPC MPs seem very content with their parties policy direction.
She resigned over the fall economic update. It was a bit more than just the GST and 250$ cheques that apparently she got a concession on.Her reference to political gimmicks I think was in reference to the GST and 250 dollar checks, I don’t think it was a rebuke of the overall policies of the Trudeau government.
Could be…I suspect it was more about supporting her recent decision. A minister resigning while dropping a fire bomb on the leader shouldn’t typically get that sort of reaction unless there is more to it.The standing ovation could as easily have been for her service in moving forward the policies as a key LPC leader in the last 9 years.
The jury will be out on whether her current actions erases her links to JT or not but it was good move to attempt that any way you look at it.Her actions of the last 9 years certainly don’t suggest she is a blue liberal.
Well after you see what happens to those who disagree what would one expect??I’m not sure the LPC actually thinks that they need a different policy direction. I suspect the internal thinking is more along the lines of Trudeau as a personality being the liability vs the LPC policies.
There has been minimal conversation about the policies being wrong from the LPC caucus. Most LPC MPs seem very content with their parties policy direction.
If someone is willing to vote for Trudeau's current band of Liberals, with or without him at the helm, then they're giving all those corrupt and immoral politicians a free pass for their behavior.What pass?
My point is that if the party wants to make it close at the next election and avoid being relegated to 3rd or 4th, new leader and new direction is required. Trudeau leaving is one step in that prprocess.
The jury will be out on whether her current actions erases her links to JT or not but it was good move to attempt that any way you look at it.
Except Freeland just countered that with what she wrote in her letter. She seemingly has positioned herself as a centrist with that. She literally disagreed with the policies and said they were wrong and got a standing ovation from a lot of caucus members.
Does it resonate? Time will tell. It did not go unnoticed though.
Maybe someone should educate Trump. He certainly thought it was Canadians…
I doubt that JTs messianic complex would allow for that scenario.Here's a conspiracy theory.
Trudeau knows he's fucked. He can read the writing on the wall. So he comes up with a plan to keep Liverals in power. He purposefully makes a mockey of the deficit "guardrail" blowing past it by 50% giving our heroine Freeland cause to take a stand against him.
He puts some icing on the cake by "telling her" he doesn't want her as finance minister and will offer her a consolidation prize lesser cabinet position.
Our noble centralist Liberal Freeland rejects the offer and courageously steps down form the cabinet, with some devastating criticism ("gimmicks"), but signals she still wants to run again in the next election.
Trudeau goes for his walk, Freeland, who is totally against Trudeau now [ ] rises like a red phoenix to lead the newly reorganized and reenergized Liberal party.
Yup. Ignorance knows no borders nor does it care what office you hold it would seem…Millions of Canadians think it was us also.
Regardless of whom the LPC may choose as its next leader they need to suffer a series of defeats and to wander in the wilderness for a few years. Only then can they rethink their existence, reconnect with the people and (hopefully) rid themselves of the influence by the Laurentian Elite.If that was even her objective. She could simply not want to be a minister if she felt she didn’t have the confidence of Trudeau. Time will tell if she actually will now support or lead a revolt or demonstrate aspirations to be the leader.
I would not recommend the LPC choose its next leader from anyone inside the Trudeau cabinet ( I could maybe be convinced otherwise in only one case) nor from the same progressive wing.
I’m not leavingIt may all be much simpler than she wants his job or anything else.
She spent a lot of time, totally out of her depth and experience, to make things work. She likely thinks, that for a journalist, she did a pretty good job.
Then His Nibs calls her on the carpet, blames her for the $61B deficit and says he's going to throw her under the bus by publicly humiliating her and firing her.
Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned. It could be that plain and simple.
However, last night as she was leaving the Laurentien Club, both her and Pony Boy were all smiles, hugging and shaking each other's hands.
I would never say they were smart enough to intentionally orchestrate the whole fiasco, but these two and this party have never been shy about deceiving Canadians.
Canadians have seen way too much criminal activity take place, by too many members, to think a change in leadership will solve their election problems.
If the do think changing leaders would change the party trajectory, there is much more ignorance and hubris, in the liberal party, than anyone thought.
Liberal “one time costs” have an irritating habit of becoming structural…Booking one time costs is less of a concern that if those were ongoing program costs.
Still not a good thing, but could be worse.
She drives me crazy with her condescending, talking to 4 year olds voice. When I'm watching Question Period, I mute her. I can't even begin to imagine the amount of airtime she'd get as Opposition Leader. I would probably stop watching ?.