• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Trump administration 2024-2028

The flaw here, us apparent in Vance's own words, "executive's legitimate power." The role of the judiciary is, on application by an interested party, to test whether or not the executive power being exercised is a legitimate one or whether it is in conflict with the constitution or any other existing federal legislation.

Judges may be unelected, but they are appointed by the executive and vetted by the Senate so are given their legitimacy by the other two branches of government. While Vance's statement is not incorrect, it is of a rabble-rousing nature, which shows he needs a refresher in American civics 101.

šŸ»
Yup. Unless the mere exercise of an existing or novelly claimed power by the executive is sufficient in and of itself to render such power ā€˜legitimateā€™, then necessarily there must be actions that are a legitimate exercise of such executive power, and actions that are not. So who would Vance have adjudicate that?

Almost like a couple hundred years of history have crafted a system into its modern form for a reason.
 
Yup. Unless the mere exercise of an existing or novelly claimed power by the executive is sufficient in and of itself to render such power ā€˜legitimateā€™, then necessarily there must be actions that are a legitimate exercise of such executive power, and actions that are not. So who would Vance have adjudicate that?

Almost like a couple hundred years of history have crafted a system into its modern form for a reason.
Well itā€™s now pretty clear that the relationship between the judiciary and the executive, especially the balancing nature, is about to change in the sense that his administration might just ignore the court decisions they donā€™t agree with. Weā€™ll see what happens with the DOGE, following which all hell will break loose down there.
 
Well itā€™s now pretty clear that the relationship between the judiciary and the executive, especially the balancing nature, is about to change in the sense that his administration might just ignore the court decisions they donā€™t agree with. Weā€™ll see what happens with the DOGE, following which all hell will break loose down there.
If the federal executive were to start flat out ignoring court decisions they donā€™t like that would be a serious and dangerous eacalation.
 
The irony is wonderful and, more preciously, completely unintended ;)

Trump makes an outrageous choice for his White House Faith Office​

After Trump's 2020 loss, Paula White said "demonic confederacies" were trying to steal the election. She'll now lead the new White House Faith Office.

 

There's alot of bauxite out there...

Aluminum is commonly produced from bauxite ore. The worldā€™s bauxite deposits for aluminum production are mainly located in tropical and subtropical regions. The total global bauxite reserve is estimated to be between 55 and 75 billion tons, with approximately 30 billion tons of this being economically viable for production. The countries with the largest aluminum reserves are as follows:

  • Guinea: 7.4 billion tons
  • Australia: 6 billion tons
  • Vietnam: 3.7 billion tons
  • Brazil: 2.6 billion tons
  • Jamaica: 2 billion tons
These five countries collectively hold about 73% of the worldā€™s bauxite reserves, amounting to approximately 22 billion tons of exploitable bauxite.

 
For aluminum, why don't we just leave be? It would be completely self inflicted pain by the US. If we wanted some form of retaliation why not put an export tax on all sales to the US that don't meet a certain price point that is designed to cause max pain to American importers?
It's something they can't do without.
If they find other sources we drop the export tax and look good. It's all about looking good for Dingdon.
 
For aluminum, why don't we just leave be? It would be completely self inflicted pain by the US. If we wanted some form of retaliation why not put an export tax on all sales to the US that don't meet a certain price point that is designed to cause max pain to American importers?
It's something they can't do without.
If they find other sources we drop the export tax and look good. It's all about looking good for Dingdon.

Wait until they come for our water...

When Trump comes calling for our water, Canada must be ready​

We had better be ready.

President-elect Donald Trump has noticed something in his travels across the U.S. Many parts of his country are running out of water. Groundwater supplies are being depleted faster than they can be replenished. The American west is in a multi-year water crisis. National Geographic says the country is ā€œrunning out of water.ā€

For Trump, to ā€œMake America Great Againā€ is to bring jobs, agriculture and energy production as well as manufacturing back to the U.S. He canā€™t do that without water, and he has already signaled where he could find some. Canada has a ā€œmassive faucetā€ that would take only one day to turn on, and all of that water ā€œwould come right down here and right into Los Angeles.ā€

The idea Canada has water to spare, however, is dead wrong. Canada has about 7% of the planetā€™s renewable freshwater and needs every drop to deal with both climate change and demand. British Columbia and Alberta in particular have faced severe drought and fires in past summers, leading the Wall Street Journal to say Canadaā€™s lakes and rivers are ā€œdrying up.ā€ In October 2024, Agriculture Canada classified 64 per cent of the country as abnormally to extremely dry, including 67 per cent of Canadaā€™s agricultural landscape.

Yet the ā€œmyth of abundanceā€ persists in Canada and elsewhere and there have been many plans to commercially export our water to the U.S. Canadians successfully opposed a number of commercial water export schemes, including the GRAND Canal that would have diverted water from James Bay, and the NAWAPA, that would have dammed rivers in northern British Columbia for diversion to the Southern U.S. Public outcry also stopped two proposed massive water export plans in the late 1990ā€™s, one from Lake Superior, the other from a glacier lake in Newfoundland, both bound by tanker for Asia.

Since then, a number of university and private policy think tanks have proposed that Canada consider putting our water on the market for sale like oil and gas. In 2011, former Prime Minster Jean Chretien said it was time for Canadians to debate the issue of ā€œwater sharing,ā€ noting that we sell oil and gas, which are finite, but not water, which is renewable.


 
Are you suggesting he hasnā€™t been doing much else these past few weeks?
I made no such claim. In his down time he's in the basement mixing vats of Kool-Aid, right next to the bathroom where he keeps his classified documents.

There's alot of bauxite out there...

Aluminum is commonly produced from bauxite ore. The worldā€™s bauxite deposits for aluminum production are mainly located in tropical and subtropical regions. The total global bauxite reserve is estimated to be between 55 and 75 billion tons, with approximately 30 billion tons of this being economically viable for production. The countries with the largest aluminum reserves are as follows:

  • Guinea: 7.4 billion tons
  • Australia: 6 billion tons
  • Vietnam: 3.7 billion tons
  • Brazil: 2.6 billion tons
  • Jamaica: 2 billion tons
These five countries collectively hold about 73% of the worldā€™s bauxite reserves, amounting to approximately 22 billion tons of exploitable bauxite.

Maybe he'll just annex them. What are we up to now . . .58 states?
 
In his down time he's in the basement mixing vats of Kool-Aid, right next to the bathroom where he keeps his classified documents.
It was Flavor Aid FFS - even all the podcasts say that. Although one could substitute Kool Aid

Oh Yeah Snl GIF by Saturday Night Live
 
Itā€™s quite disturbing given the current situationā€¦
If the Liberals win the election it's a great reason to "pause" the confiscation part of their gun ban while continuing to deprive Canadians of their property (and pay compensation).

Never let a crisis goto waste.
 
Wait until they come for our water...

When Trump comes calling for our water, Canada must be ready​

We had better be ready.

President-elect Donald Trump has noticed something in his travels across the U.S. Many parts of his country are running out of water. Groundwater supplies are being depleted faster than they can be replenished. The American west is in a multi-year water crisis. National Geographic says the country is ā€œrunning out of water.ā€

For Trump, to ā€œMake America Great Againā€ is to bring jobs, agriculture and energy production as well as manufacturing back to the U.S. He canā€™t do that without water, and he has already signaled where he could find some. Canada has a ā€œmassive faucetā€ that would take only one day to turn on, and all of that water ā€œwould come right down here and right into Los Angeles.ā€

The idea Canada has water to spare, however, is dead wrong. Canada has about 7% of the planetā€™s renewable freshwater and needs every drop to deal with both climate change and demand. British Columbia and Alberta in particular have faced severe drought and fires in past summers, leading the Wall Street Journal to say Canadaā€™s lakes and rivers are ā€œdrying up.ā€ In October 2024, Agriculture Canada classified 64 per cent of the country as abnormally to extremely dry, including 67 per cent of Canadaā€™s agricultural landscape.

Yet the ā€œmyth of abundanceā€ persists in Canada and elsewhere and there have been many plans to commercially export our water to the U.S. Canadians successfully opposed a number of commercial water export schemes, including the GRAND Canal that would have diverted water from James Bay, and the NAWAPA, that would have dammed rivers in northern British Columbia for diversion to the Southern U.S. Public outcry also stopped two proposed massive water export plans in the late 1990ā€™s, one from Lake Superior, the other from a glacier lake in Newfoundland, both bound by tanker for Asia.

Since then, a number of university and private policy think tanks have proposed that Canada consider putting our water on the market for sale like oil and gas. In 2011, former Prime Minster Jean Chretien said it was time for Canadians to debate the issue of ā€œwater sharing,ā€ noting that we sell oil and gas, which are finite, but not water, which is renewable.


100% for certain they will be coming for this -

Remember, they have 100% access to ALL of Lake Michigan's water and it is possible for them to take more water from there and push it through the Mississippi River for shipping and such.
 
100% for certain they will be coming for this -

Remember, they have 100% access to ALL of Lake Michigan's water and it is possible for them to take more water from there and push it through the Mississippi River for shipping and such.
They are taking it.
If we could scrub the stupid contract that allows Nestle to take spring water, we might get an early indication of just how much they need our water right now, and itā€™s not for shipping or golf courses.
 
Back
Top