• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Trump administration 2024-2028

I think there's two possibilities, but only one probability here. Firstly, either the measure gets defeated in Congress, because the Republicans vote as a block, or less likely, those Republicans who's seats are already in jeopardy at the mid terms, vote for impeachment.
 
Halifax Tar said:
I think this is wrong move. It didn't work out well last time.

I think the Dems are smarter to let the American enjoy the Gov the elected and come in after to clean it up as saviors and hero's.

I think this just further raises the tension.
Click to expand...
Perhaps that's the difference between a statesman and a politician. A politician i motivated by political opportunity and power. A statesman sees the nation they chose to serve becoming a laughing stock and the Constitution they swore to uphold being used a toilet paper.
 
Impeachment over legal issues that haven't been settled yet is a terrible idea. Yes, I know some things like the "mistaken" deportation of that guy to El Salvador look manifestly unlawful. "We're going to impeach over one or two or a few particular illegal things the administration did" is a terrible precedent to set, considering how some people felt about the "war criminals" Bush, Cheney, and Obama. Administrations do a lot of illegal things.
 
Brad Sallows said:
Impeachment over legal issues that haven't been settled yet is a terrible idea. Yes, I know some things like the "mistaken" deportation of that guy to El Salvador look manifestly unlawful. "We're going to impeach over one or two or a few particular illegal things the administration did" is a terrible precedent to set, considering how some people felt about the "war criminals" Bush, Cheney, and Obama. Administrations do a lot of illegal things.
Click to expand...
On the other hand, a Congress that gets a taste for hitting the "nice try, next!" button as far as presidents wouldn't be the worst thing regardless of party.
 
Halifax Tar said:
I think this is wrong move. It didn't work out well last time.

I think the Dems are smarter to let the American enjoy the Gov the elected and come in after to clean it up as saviors and hero's.

I think this just further raises the tension.
Click to expand...
1000% this ^


By trying to impeach President Trump so early into his term wreaks of the same lawfare nonsense the Dems dragged Trump through for years - and is the very thing that has really spoiled their brand

The American people voted Trump in, and got behind his platform. So now it's time to get to work & get stuff done.

Creating more lawfare to fill the airwaves with is just going to annoy the public & work against them come election time
 
dapaterson said:
Lindsey Graham apparently has endorsed Trump as the next Pope.

There is not a reality, current or alternate, where that sentence makes sense.

Click to expand...

If I were still a practising Catholic, I'd be pretty offended at the very notion. As far as I know Trump still identifies as Non-denominational.

This is the same admin, right?

www.whitehouse.gov

Establishment of The White House Faith Office

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and to assist faith-based entities,
www.whitehouse.gov www.whitehouse.gov
www.whitehouse.gov

Eradicating Anti-Christian Bias

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered: Section 1. Purpose
www.whitehouse.gov www.whitehouse.gov
 
HavokFour said:
If I were still a practising Catholic, I'd be pretty offended at the very notion. As far as I know Trump still identifies as Non-denominational.

This is the same admin, right?

www.whitehouse.gov

Establishment of The White House Faith Office

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and to assist faith-based entities,
www.whitehouse.gov www.whitehouse.gov
www.whitehouse.gov

Eradicating Anti-Christian Bias

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered: Section 1. Purpose
www.whitehouse.gov www.whitehouse.gov
Click to expand...
I’m not Catholic- heathenish here but raised in the Christian tradition.

And I’m offended at that notion as well.
 
What is it with people who feel the need to verbally express every stupid thought that pops up in a dream? When you have to qualify or follow-up everything you say with 'just kidding', after a very short while, people just conclude you are delusional. Or just be like MTG and just tell any questioner with '**** off'.
 
ModlrMike said:
These read like they won't survive contact with the Supreme Court.
Click to expand...
But will Trump’s response be “How many divisions does the Supreme Court have?”? Or “The Supreme Court has made their ruling. Now they can enforce it”?
 
HavokFour said:
If I were still a practising Catholic, I'd be pretty offended at the very notion. As far as I know Trump still identifies as Non-denominational.

This is the same admin, right?

www.whitehouse.gov

Establishment of The White House Faith Office

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and to assist faith-based entities,
www.whitehouse.gov www.whitehouse.gov
www.whitehouse.gov

Eradicating Anti-Christian Bias

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered: Section 1. Purpose
www.whitehouse.gov www.whitehouse.gov
Click to expand...
Even if he's Catholic, and there wasn't a requirement for the pope to be part of the clergy, there are some pretty archaic restrictions against divorcees (that are largely ignored). Also infidelity, lying, defrauding charities, causing global chaos and generally being a POS human are all frowned upon in doctrine, and the middle ages had enough power mad popes.
 
Navy_Pete said:
Even if he's Catholic, and there wasn't a requirement for the pope to be part of the clergy, there are some pretty archaic restrictions against divorcees (that are largely ignored). Also infidelity, lying, defrauding charities, causing global chaos and generally being a POS human are all frowned upon in doctrine, and the middle ages had enough power mad popes.
Click to expand...
en.wikipedia.org

Banco Ambrosiano - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
 
Navy_Pete said:
Even if he's Catholic, and there wasn't a requirement for the pope to be part of the clergy, there are some pretty archaic restrictions against divorcees (that are largely ignored). Also infidelity, lying, defrauding charities, causing global chaos and generally being a POS human are all frowned upon in doctrine, and the middle ages had enough power mad popes.
Click to expand...

I hope you'll be ok when he starts his third term.
 
Navy_Pete said:
Even if he's Catholic, and there wasn't a requirement for the pope to be part of the clergy, there are some pretty archaic restrictions against divorcees (that are largely ignored). Also infidelity, lying, defrauding charities, causing global chaos and generally being a POS human are all frowned upon in doctrine, and the middle ages had enough power mad popes.
Click to expand...
So you're saying there's a chance?
 
dapaterson said:
en.wikipedia.org

Banco Ambrosiano - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
Click to expand...
Yeah, I was raised Catholic but walked away from it at 18 for a reason; what they said to do and what they actually do are two different things.

Will say the last Pope seemed like a generally decent human being, but I wouldn't shed a tear if the institution flamed out tomorrow and every single one of them had to live the vows of poverty and lack of worldly goods they are supposed to live by, and all their worldly wealth was redistributed to actually do some good, as there is a massive amount of hypocrisy (and I think on the majority of Christian religions at the institutional and mega-church level).

I think the Be-attitude (treat people how you want to be treated) is a solid way to approach life, but pretty common to a number of other religions and non-religious ways of life so not unique or special, and I don't feel any need to pay some wizened guy on the other side of the planet to live in a gold bedecked palace to intercede on my behalf with a god I don't believe in.
 
QV said:
I hope you'll be ok when he starts his third term.
Click to expand...
That's bold, but not my place to enforce basic US constitutional fundamentals.

Also, the over under on him making to the end of his 2nd term given his diet and general lack of mental acuity doesn't seem to favour that option. Your continued loyalty to someone that has the worst interests of Canadians (and most Americans) at heart is interesting though.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top