• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Trump administration 2024-2028

Let me check their birth rate...

Not just that...

Deportation and Immigration :

45% of 18 - 29 year old men approve of the way President Trump is handling deportation and immigration, compared to just 21% of 18 - 29 year old women.
 
Time for an update on the attack on the Venezuelan "drug" boat. According to Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) who stated that the attack was carried out by an UAV. Plus, statements by various officials/experts that the attack was illegal.

In the second report (also from the Intercept) anon. officials have stated that the boat was actually hit twice, not just the single hit posted by the white House.

And finally, the Venezuelan government on Friday stated that one of its tuna fishing boats was boarded and held by USN forces for eight hours.



 
Another instance of shooting yourself in the foot.

“Korean workers are being treated like criminals for building factories that Washington itself lobbied for,” said a company executive in Seoul. “If this continues, investment in the US could be reconsidered.”



Ripple effect.

 
Time for an update on the attack on the Venezuelan "drug" boat. According to Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) who stated that the attack was carried out by an UAV. Plus, statements by various officials/experts that the attack was illegal

I guess now we know why the administration got rid of all the JAGs.

On this type of operation there would, in all probability, be an on-board representative of the Navy's office of the JAG. It would be usual that during such an engagement legal advice would be sought or offered during the targeting process. Commanders can choose to ignore a JAG opinion but there would be consequences. - At least in a normal administration.

Be interesting to be a fly on the wall.

🍻
 
Drastic situations call for drastic measures.
What drastic situation calls for masking up and effectively kidnapping citizens from their place of employment without justification in order to check their papers? Please try to give me an answer to this that’s congruent with some concept of a state valuing individual liberty and protection from arbitrary arrest or detention. To me this looks like using the Fourth Amendment as toilet paper.
 
Opening the border and flooding the country with millions of illegal entries of unknown origin and intention.
 
Tell me QV, is this "Opening the border" in the room with us now?

I'm not sure what you mean. I'll try and give you my thoughts on what I think you're asking.

Previous administrations put policy in place, or ignored existing policy, that allowed for the flood of millions of illegal entries into their country.

The current administration has made efforts to reverse this, the border has now been secured much more effectively. Phase 1, stop the inflow, has largely been achieved. Going out on a limb, I suspect phase 2 of this is to find and deport those most problematic (criminals, openly displaying bad intentions, etc). I suspect concurrently with Phase 2, the admin is working on a path to resident or citizenship status for the many people who arrived illegally but have turned into contributing members of society.

Bottom line, unchecked mass illegal migration can cause havoc on your country as we can see with many EU nations dealing with their own migrant problems.
 
Opening the border and flooding the country with millions of illegal entries of unknown origin and intention.
So any and all citizens are arbitrarily arrestable by ICE for the purpose of confirming their citizenship status? That’s the necessary logical conclusion of what you’re saying.
 
forgetting rights for a minute- it’s the most expensive way to use your resources for the least return. Anyone who hates big government and wasteful spending should not support the most laborious method with the poorest return for time investment you could manage.
 
So any and all citizens are arbitrarily arrestable by ICE for the purpose of confirming their citizenship status? That’s the necessary logical conclusion of what you’re saying.

No, that's a leap. I gather some sort of articulable cause is required.
 
That isn’t very consistent with your previous thoughts on suppression of rights.

My views on personal rights haven't changed. But the more the crazy left subverts prior norms, the harder the correction might potentially be. That's not a ringing endorsement, that's just my observation.

In this case, prior norms means a country with a secure border and control of immigration.
 
I'm not sure what you mean. I'll try and give you my thoughts on what I think you're asking.

Previous administrations put policy in place, or ignored existing policy, that allowed for the flood of millions of illegal entries into their country.

The current administration has made efforts to reverse this, the border has now been secured much more effectively. Phase 1, stop the inflow, has largely been achieved. Going out on a limb, I suspect phase 2 of this is to find and deport those most problematic (criminals, openly displaying bad intentions, etc). I suspect concurrently with Phase 2, the admin is working on a path to resident or citizenship status for the many people who arrived illegally but have turned into contributing members of society.

Bottom line, unchecked mass illegal migration can cause havoc on your country as we can see with many EU nations dealing with their own migrant problems.
Keep in mind during the 2018 election Presidential candidate Trump blasted the Obama Administration for rounding up illegals, separating families. He even visited some of the facilities to crow about how inhuman it was. He closed a lot of the detention facilities and allowed unrestricted access.

Both parties have kicked the can down the road for political purposes. Obama was the first to address it in years, albeit he was a lot more sneaky about it that POTUS47.
 
No, that's a leap. I gather some sort of articulable cause is required.
They were being Latino at work. This is widespread government intimidation, but absolutely nothing to do with distracting people from runaway inflation, job losses or other significant impacts from stupid Trump economic policies drafted in crayon, or the Epstein files that now are fake news, but used to be a Democrat coverup.

Lot of doublethink on the go.
 
Back
Top