• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Trump administration 2024-2028

Show me where a US law maker was enlightened over the ad. Or where a US senator realized Trump was wrong because of the ad.
How about we show you where the entire country of the US is enlightened.


‘They Hate Donald Trump’: Harry Enten Delivers An Ice-Cold Reality Check On Canada​

Canada, he noted, is “far more popular” in the United States than Trump himself, citing a net favorability rating among Americans of +49 percentage points for Canada versus -10 for Trump.

“Pretty much every single time among most Americans, Americans will choose Canada over Donald Trump,”
 
The basic definition is a Canadian who supports Trump policies and politics.

That can be further defined into sub categories of Canadians that put that type of support over their own country even if those policies are to the detriment of Canada. Like any movement or ideology there are degrees of support.

If you are talking about here on this site, there are 3 I’d classify as hard core Maple Maga and maybe one or two as soft supporters. No I will not name them. Their posting history speaks for itself.

If you are talking about in the public space? PP has been accused of it, most of the Alberta separation movement could be classified that way. Jenny Byrne and Candice Bergen with their Maga hats could also be lumped in there by critics.
So Maple Magas are NFL fans? 🇮
 
Which was what exactly?

I see:

-immediate termination of all trade negotiations between the U.S. and Canada,
The ad is being used as a pretext. If an ad quoting Reagan that punctured Trump’s tissue-thin skin was all it took to derail a trade deal, then the talks weren’t genuine from their side anyway. Besides, they’ve already clarified that it was more about Canada being ‘difficult’, as discussed above. No real negotiation in good faith is so easily derailed as that.

-10 % increase in tariffs on Canadian goods as punishment for the ad.
All prior rounds of tantrums tariffs have exempted CUSMA, so ‘10% on everything’ is far from ‘on everything’. And the ‘punishment’ narrative ultimately helps us when SCOTUS hears this.

Rather than easing trade tensions, it worsened them.
Sure. Trump is thin skinned and a bully. He doesn’t like being embarrassed by contrary facts. Oh well, tough shit. He’s introduced tons of tension on his own as is. If the ghost of Reagan talking plainly about his basic economic beliefs increases tension, that’s because he has to resolve some cognitive dissonance.

As far as credibility goes the Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation & Institute stated that the ad mis-represents Reagan’s remarks and that Ontario did not seek permission to edit and use the speech.
They’re utterly full of shit, and Reagan would be spinning in his grave. The remarks were accurately stated and contextualized. They were a presidential radio speech on the public domain and don’t require permission to use. Trump is demonstrably lying, as recklessly as he ever does, and the Reagan foundation is trying to curry favour by prostituting Reagan’s economic legacy for Trump. But they’re making The Gipper’s ghost say and do things he would never do or say.

A report published by the Financial Accountability Office of Ontario estimated that ongoing US tariffs could result in a drop of $17.4B in exports, a loss of 106,000 jobs by 2026, and GDP reduction of 1.7% relative to no-tariff scenario.

People are just trying to spin this the same way we tried to spin Trump being 4 hours late to the Hamas peace deal. Except this will potentially cost us billions.
Yes, ongoing US tariffs hurt us as they hurt literally every other economy, including America’s. One person is responsible for that, and we’re trying to negotiate with a toddler who randomly throws his toys out of the stroller when it suits him. No political leader anywhere can fully control for that. Right now as a country we’re doing our best to ride out the storm. Lots of hope is in the Supreme Court right now, and for a change in tide at the midterms.
 
The ad is being used as a pretext. If an ad quoting Reagan that punctured Trump’s tissue-thin skin was all it took to derail a trade deal, then the talks weren’t genuine from their side anyway. Besides, they’ve already clarified that it was more about Canada being ‘difficult’, as discussed above. No real negotiation in good faith is so easily derailed as that.


All prior rounds of tantrums tariffs have exempted CUSMA, so ‘10% on everything’ is far from ‘on everything’. And the ‘punishment’ narrative ultimately helps us when SCOTUS hears this.


Sure. Trump is thin skinned and a bully. He doesn’t like being embarrassed by contrary facts. Oh well, tough shit. He’s introduced tons of tension on his own as is. If the ghost of Reagan talking plainly about his basic economic beliefs increases tension, that’s because he has to resolve some cognitive dissonance.


They’re utterly full of shit, and Reagan would be spinning in his grave. The remarks were accurately stated and contextualized. They were a presidential radio speech on the public domain and don’t require permission to use. Trump is demonstrably lying, as recklessly as he ever does, and the Reagan foundation is trying to curry favour by prostituting Reagan’s economic legacy for Trump. But they’re making The Gipper’s ghost say and do things he would never do or say.


Yes, ongoing US tariffs hurt us as they hurt literally every other economy, including America’s. One person is responsible for that, and we’re trying to negotiate with a toddler who randomly throws his toys out of the stroller when it suits him. No political leader anywhere can fully control for that. Right now as a country we’re doing our best to ride out the storm. Lots of hope is in the Supreme Court right now, and for a change in tide at the midterms.
I admire your faith in the SCOTUS to vote on principle and not partisans lines.
 
Back
Top