• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Trump administration 2024-2028

As some people previously speculated, it appears that a member of the Moroun family was in communication with Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick just hours before Trump went on his rampage about the Gordie Howe Bridge.

The Moroun family is well known for fucking around in Windsor. They bought up a few streets of housing adjacent to the existing Ambassador Bridge 20 odd years ago and kicked all the families out and boarded up the homes because they were try to force the governments on both sides of the order to allow them to twin the Ambassador Bridge. They even went so far on the US side of the bridge to build without an approval the complete new approaches for the new bridge in hopes of forcing the state of Michigan to allow them to continue since it was already built.
They are shysters.
 
The Moroun family is well known for fucking around in Windsor. They bought up a few streets of housing adjacent to the existing Ambassador Bridge 20 odd years ago and kicked all the families out and boarded up the homes because they were try to force the governments on both sides of the order to allow them to twin the Ambassador Bridge. They even went so far on the US side of the bridge to build without an approval the complete new approaches for the new bridge in hopes of forcing the state of Michigan to allow them to continue since it was already built.
They are shysters.
Sounds like we had good reason to build a different bridge
 
Oh yes, alot is getting done.

He's winning the Attention War, which is all important if you're running the most powerful, but distracted, country in the world...


Trump wants our attention. Let’s stop falling for his geopolitical clickbait
Whether he’s targeting Greenland, tariffs or Iran, Trump’s agenda is to distract – because a Europe that is always reacting is never planning


When Donald Trump reassured the world that he would not, after all, use force to acquire Greenland – after days of threatening as much – he was doing what he does best: turning geopolitics into a spectacle. Whether Trump ever truly believed the US should acquire a vast Arctic territory belonging to a Nato ally is secondary to the fact that, once again, he ensured that Europe and the rest of the world were focused on his agenda.

Trump is not a politician who responds to events – he seeks to make them. Not because he is deeply invested in policy detail, but because he understands a defining feature of contemporary politics: attention is power. In an era of information overload, there is no scarcity of data or analysis; what is lacking is attention. And whoever controls that controls the debate.

Steve Bannon once described Trump’s domestic strategy as “flood the zone with shit”. In other words, create so many scandals that opponents no longer know which ones matter. The media chases everything, the opposition is perpetually outraged and no one has the mental space to set their own priorities. This logic and the accompanying tactics are now also being deployed by the US in its foreign policy.

Trump’s threats towards Denmark and Greenland were not isolated provocations, but a form of geopolitical clickbait. Their purpose was to dominate the news cycle, push other governments into reactive mode and crowd out longer-term strategic thinking. Greenland was perfect for this. It is strategically important – located in the Arctic, between North America and Europe – yet remote enough that few voters have much detailed knowledge about it. That made it ideal for attention capture: dramatic enough for headlines, vague enough for endless speculation.


Thats an effective short term strategy, but the damage done to America's reputation and world standing will take generations to repair.

Europe was reacting, and shifting away from America. I think his team is neither smart enough to realize the long term damage they are doing, or doesn't just care as long as they win right now.
 

Further followup on the video by congressional democrats reminding military members of the duty to disobey illegal orders: Nothing to see here, just the administration trying and failing to charge two senators and several other congressional reps with sedition.


DC grand jury declines to indict Sens. Kelly, Slotkin for seditious conspiracy: MS Now​

PUBLISHED TUE, FEB 10 2026 9:16 PM ESTUPDATED TUE, FEB 10 2026 11:02 PM EST

Dan Mangan

KEY POINTS
  • A federal grand jury in Washington, D.C., declined a request by prosecutors to indict two U.S. senators, Mark Kelly and Elissa Slotkin, on charges of seditious conspiracy.
  • The attempted indictment of Kelly and Slotkin related to a video they participated in with four other Democrats in Congress that reminded members of the U.S. military that they have the right to refuse to follow illegal orders by superiors.
  • "This is an outrageous abuse of power by Donald Trump and his lackies," said Kelly, an Arizona Democrat.

A federal grand jury in Washington, D.C., declined a request by prosecutors to indict two Democratic U.S. senators, Mark Kelly of Arizona and Michigan's Elissa Slotkin, on charges of seditious conspiracy, MS Now reported Tuesday night.

The attempted indictment of Kelly, a former U.S. Navy captain and the former CIA analyst Slotkin related to a video in November that they made with four other Democrats in Congress, on which they reminded members of the U.S. military that they have the right to refuse to follow illegal orders by superiors.

The video was released on social media in response to ongoing extrajudicial killings by the U.S. military of crews of boats in the Caribbean and Pacific that allegedly were carrying narcotics.

The New York Times reported that federal prosecutors also tried and failed to obtain indictments against the other four Democrats, in addition to Kelly and Slotkin. Rep. Maggie Goodlander of New Hampshire, who is a former Navy reservist, and Rep. Chris Deluzio of Pennsylvania, a Navy veteran, later indicated they were among the six reportedly targeted in the indictment effort.

The other two Democrats who made the video were Reps. Jason Crow of Colorado, who was an Army Ranger, and Chrissy Houlahan of Pennsylvania, who is a former Air Force officer.

It is extremely unusual for a grand jury to refuse to issue an indictment when a prosecutor seeks one. An indictment is a charging document that a grand jury will issue if jurors agree there is probable cause to believe a crime was committed.

President Donald Trump had condemned the Democrats for the video after it was made public on Nov. 18.

Trump at the time accused them of "SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH!"

"Each one of these traitors to our Country should be ARRESTED AND PUT ON TRIAL," Trump wrote on Truth Social then.

Kelly, who is also a former NASA astronaut, blasted the effort to indict him.

"This is an outrageous abuse of power by Donald Trump and his lackies," Kelly said in a post on X on Tuesday.

"It wasn't enough for [Defense Secretary] Pete Hegseth to censure me and threaten to demote me, now it appears they tried to have me charged with a crime — all because of something I said that they didn't like. That's not the way," Kelly said.

Kelly is suing the Pentagon to challenge its censure of him and its effort to reduce his rank because of his participation in the video.

Slotkin, in a statement, said, "Today, U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro attempted to persuade a Grand Jury to indict me. This was in response to me organizing a 90-second video that simply quoted the law."

"Pirro did this at the direction of President Trump, who said repeatedly that I should be investigated, arrested, and hanged for sedition," Slotkin said. "Today, it was a grand jury of anonymous American citizens who upheld the rule of law and determined this case should not proceed. Hopefully, this ends this politicized investigation for good."

"But today wasn't just an embarrassing day for the Administration. It was another sad day for our country," she said.

House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said Tuesday night that he believes the six Democrats who made the video on illegal orders to the military should be indicted.

Goodlander, in a statement, said, "President Trump directed the Justice Department to investigate me, arrest me, and hang me simply for doing my job."

"Today an American grand jury honored our Constitution by standing up to an outrageous abuse of presidential power and taxpayer dollars," Goodlander said. "No matter the threats, I will keep doing my job and upholding my oath to our Constitution."

Deluzio, in a statement, said, "I will not be intimidated for a single second by the Trump Administration or Justice Department lawyers who tried and failed to indict me today. American citizens on a grand jury refused to go along with this attempt to charge me with a crime for stating the law in a way Trump and his enablers didn't like."

"They may want Americans to be afraid to speak out or to disagree — but patriotism demands courage in this moment. DON'T GIVE UP THE SHIP!" Deluzio said.
 
A little background on the Moroun family that owns the existing Ambassador Bridge in Windsor. They had a meeting with Lutnick and within a few hours Trump issued his 'X' msg about the Gordie Howe Bridge.


Land Grab: How a bridge baron ruined a neighbourhood​

Billionaire bridge owner Matty Moroun has spent at least $52 million on Windsor property over the years, including 139 houses, apartment buildings and vacant lots in Sandwich, a Windsor Star investigation has found.
 
Back
Top