Oldgateboatdriver
Army.ca Fixture
- Reaction score
- 5,685
- Points
- 1,040
You must be as old as the Almanach!
It should read: "I'll take obscure publishing news for $400, Ken ...
Trump administration 2024-2028
- Thread starter dimsum
- Start date
You must be as old as the Almanach!
It should read: "I'll take obscure publishing news for $400, Ken ...
- Reaction score
- 8,492
- Points
- 1,360
I don't use the phrase "back in the day when the earth was cooling" as much as I used to
- Reaction score
- 4,217
- Points
- 1,040
They don’t or they don’t care. At this point I lean towards the second point as they have already done similar things with deadly results. If they are choosing to ignore that they are willfully ignorant.
People have already died from this administrations removal of funding to similar things, like in Texas last year. I suspect more will continue to die from this administrations callous actions.
daftandbarmy
Army.ca Fossil
- Reaction score
- 47,812
- Points
- 1,160
- Reaction score
- 12,175
- Points
- 1,040
Yes, just as every federal dollar spent provides some kind of benefit to someone, every federal dollar removed risks someone dying. What is staggering, though, is the number of people dying because spending isn't being pushed to much higher levels.
- Reaction score
- 8,492
- Points
- 1,360
(GW Bush-appointed) Federal Judge to the "Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History" Administration: yes, you have to put the slavery thing back up in the President's House exhibit in Philly ....
penncapital-star.com
www.aljazeera.com
www.pbs.org
abc7ny.com
Federal judge orders the restoration of exhibits on slavery to the President’s House in Philadelphia • Pennsylvania Capital-Star
Her ruling, issued on President’s Day, began with an epigraph from George Orwell’s novel 1984, describing the erasure of history by a fictional totalitarian government.
penncapital-star.com
Judge orders Trump administration to restore Philadelphia slavery exhibit
Judge accuses the US government of trying to rewrite history by taking down the exhibit in the city of Philadelphia.
Citing Orwell’s ‘1984,’ judge orders Trump administration to restore slavery exhibit it removed in Philadelphia
A federal judge has ordered an exhibit about nine people enslaved by George Washington to be restored at his former home in Philadelphia after President Donald Trump’s administration took it down last month.
www.pbs.org
Judge orders administration to restore slavery exhibit at President's House Site
A federal judge has prohibited the Trump administration from removing an exhibit related to slavery in a section of Philadelphia's Independence National Historical Park.
abc7ny.com
MilEME09
Army.ca Fixture
- Reaction score
- 8,264
- Points
- 1,210
Since when does this administration listen to court orders?(GW Bush-appointed) Federal Judge to the "Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History" Administration: yes, you have to put the slavery thing back up in the President's House exhibit in Philly ....
Federal judge orders the restoration of exhibits on slavery to the President’s House in Philadelphia • Pennsylvania Capital-Star
Her ruling, issued on President’s Day, began with an epigraph from George Orwell’s novel 1984, describing the erasure of history by a fictional totalitarian government.Judge orders Trump administration to restore Philadelphia slavery exhibit
Judge accuses the US government of trying to rewrite history by taking down the exhibit in the city of Philadelphia.Citing Orwell’s ‘1984,’ judge orders Trump administration to restore slavery exhibit it removed in Philadelphia
A federal judge has ordered an exhibit about nine people enslaved by George Washington to be restored at his former home in Philadelphia after President Donald Trump’s administration took it down last month.Judge orders administration to restore slavery exhibit at President's House Site
A federal judge has prohibited the Trump administration from removing an exhibit related to slavery in a section of Philadelphia's Independence National Historical Park.
- Reaction score
- 2,486
- Points
- 1,260
When in their favour?
- Reaction score
- 12,175
- Points
- 1,040
Across the entire board, very close to 100% of the time. Legal observers have noted that Trump's administrations have been heavily challenged in courts and nonetheless comply when legal options are exhausted or the administration doesn't want to pursue all options. Some people are misled into believing that the administration ignores orders because they don't understand the procedural wrangling, particularly those who mistake lower courts' procedural orders as some kinds of final judgements and don't pay attention to the subsequent rounds until all legal options are exhausted.
There are some obvious outright exceptions, almost entirely related to deportation activity - eg. demands to return or expedite return of a person or people deported, or to immediately release people taken into custody for deportation - which mean no-one should claim 100% compliance for the administration. The particular weak point is the delaying tactics being used to avoid having to release people detained for deportation. The administration is determined to deport people in the country illegally, and people opposed to deportations are determined to use the courts to fight as many battles as possible. There is not a good faith intent on either side to expeditiously deport only the masses of people in the country illegally who are legitimately deportable.
From one side, the administration is ignoring the courts and all the fault is on the administration. From the other side, prior administrations set up the problem by ignoring faithful execution of the laws and all the fault is on them, and those continuing to resist and failing to cooperate with enforcement. Intractable.
- Reaction score
- 13,770
- Points
- 1,160
"At one dinner with critical prominent economists, he added: “The president says, ‘I understand you guys are upset.’ They said, ‘Yes, we’re upset. You’re choosing a path. Instead of restructuring the banks, you’re going to put millions of people out of homes. Yes, we’re upset.’”
"Obama, Trumka said, replied: “I understand that, but they give me peace and quiet in the capital market. And I need peace and quiet in the capital market so that I can get this other important work done.”
"Trumka never forgot the exchange. “That still rings in my head,” he said. “They [the Obama administration] never understood the anger. Quite frankly, when that [the financial crash and subsequent bail outs] happened, people wanted vengeance.”
"That tale of a breakdown of trust between Obama’s White House and the American public, which Trump seized on in his rise to office, comes up in a range of policy areas covered by the oral histories."
And thus, Trump....
And NATO and Canada.
Roland OliphantChief Foreign Analyst
"Obama, Trumka said, replied: “I understand that, but they give me peace and quiet in the capital market. And I need peace and quiet in the capital market so that I can get this other important work done.”
"Trumka never forgot the exchange. “That still rings in my head,” he said. “They [the Obama administration] never understood the anger. Quite frankly, when that [the financial crash and subsequent bail outs] happened, people wanted vengeance.”
"That tale of a breakdown of trust between Obama’s White House and the American public, which Trump seized on in his rise to office, comes up in a range of policy areas covered by the oral histories."
And thus, Trump....
And NATO and Canada.
Obama thought Trump was a joke. He completely misjudged the mood in America
Hundreds of newly-released interviews have revealed just how badly the Democrat administration failed to grasp realityRoland OliphantChief Foreign Analyst
Halifax Tar
Army.ca Legend
- Reaction score
- 20,283
- Points
- 1,260
I wonder if Obama would like a Mulligan on that one ?
- Reaction score
- 3,143
- Points
- 1,090
why he got his 8 yrs
- Reaction score
- 42,483
- Points
- 1,210
"Look, as a Jesus lover and homeschool mom I support what ICE is doing, but I don't want their camps beside the cheerleading gym I run; what if a three year old sees someone in shackles?"
Halifax Tar
Army.ca Legend
- Reaction score
- 20,283
- Points
- 1,260
Her first two concerns are valid, IMHO. But the last one silly.
- Reaction score
- 8,451
- Points
- 1,260
Isn't a bit like saying, 'I don't want the Jew's rounded up next to my school, what if the children see them being beaten as they get on the trains?'
Halifax Tar
Army.ca Legend
- Reaction score
- 20,283
- Points
- 1,260
Her third point ? I think thats probably what you want it equate to.
But I think as a parent or care giver to small children we look to shelter them from things. I still think its silly.
The safety concerns are valid though IMHO.
- Reaction score
- 8,451
- Points
- 1,260
agreed but is it just another version of NIMBY?
Halifax Tar
Army.ca Legend
- Reaction score
- 20,283
- Points
- 1,260
Sure.
I also don't want a homeless encampment in my back yard. Shoot me.
We have always moved these things outsoide of towns. Tour Kingston, Ont and you can watch how the city as grown by where the prisons are.
- Reaction score
- 12,175
- Points
- 1,040
Criminals are sometimes seen in shackles, as a consequence of many laws. Film at 11. Gut check when people realize it's not just for one thing is optional.