GR66
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 5,392
- Points
- 1,160
I agree with you as I was in the same "buy America" boat for most things but I think it's important that we don't bite off our nose to spite our face.I was the biggest proponent of buy American before you/them went and got all 51st statey on us.
I still think the best option for most things is American, simply because that sustainment tail is unbeatable. But I dont think the political or social will is there to spend money down there right now.
Your/their Prez really fucked things up. This is on the USA, not Canada.
The reality is that the defence of Canada (and North America) will always be a joint effort between Canada and the United States. Close cooperation and interoperability with the US will continue to be important factors in much of our defence procurement - especially in the Air and Naval side of things. Even on the Army side of things any expeditionary conflict we get in will likely have a major US involvement.
Regardless of who's kit we decide to buy we should always make the effort to do so as joint ventures with at least key components (if not full product) production in Canada where possible and volumes, etc. make sense.
So long as Canada is a credible partner in the joint defence of North America the US would have absolutely zero incentive to in any way to do anything to reduce our military effectiveness in being able to help defend themselves.
As far as Europe is concerned - we have forces deployed there with plans to be able to surge more forces in the case of conflict. How many European countries have plans in place to deploy forces to Canada to defend our territory in case of hostilities?