QV
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 2,964
- Points
- 1,010
Or you could go see for yourself. Rasmussen is just the handle sharing. The material I am referring to are videos of hearings, documents, court cases etc.To quote from another thread:
Or you could go see for yourself. Rasmussen is just the handle sharing. The material I am referring to are videos of hearings, documents, court cases etc.To quote from another thread:
Well of course there will be a number of metrics involved. Hence the reason why, in my mind, the rolls should be cleansed every four years, a year before the election. Less if they can get it done. The least amount of time between cleaning them and the election, the better.I wonder if the number of eligible voters changes over the time between elections? People dying, moving, coming to voting age, etc.
And to continue quoting from that thread, neither has most of the other MSM outlets.To quote from another thread:
Jesus, really? There are lots of convictions out there for this very thing. Do your own work and look it up instead of casting shade. You asked for sources, you were told Rasmussen had them, then you discount Rasmussen as not being credible without even looking.How are they getting hundreds of mail-in ballots?
And if mail-in voting was so bad, why is the GOP pivoting on it this time around after lambasting it in the 2020 election (which may have cost them the election)?
Fair.Jesus, really? There are lots of convictions out there for this very thing. Do your own work and look it up instead of casting shade. You asked for sources, you were told Rasmussen had them, then you discount Rasmussen as not being credible without even looking.
Edit - here's one. You can find more on your own.
![]()
Video: Judge overturns election after Democrats caught ballot stuffing
A judge overturned a Democratic primary election over video footage revealing individuals stuffing absentee ballots into ballot drop boxes.americanmilitarynews.com
Jesus, really? There are lots of convictions out there for this very thing. Do your own work and look it up instead of casting shade. You asked for sources, you were told Rasmussen had them, then you discount Rasmussen as not being credible without even looking.
Edit - here's one. You can find more on your own.
![]()
Video: Judge overturns election after Democrats caught ballot stuffing
A judge overturned a Democratic primary election over video footage revealing individuals stuffing absentee ballots into ballot drop boxes.americanmilitarynews.com
As Bridgeport prepares for its third mayoral election in five months, political operatives in the city are, once again, locked in an all-out battle for absentee votes.
Ganim, who returned to the mayor's office in 2015 after serving seven years in prison on federal corruption charges, has relied heavily on absentee votes to win many of his most recent elections.
Municipal primaries in Connecticut are frequently low-turnout affairs, with less than a quarter of all eligible voters participating in those elections. And that is unlikely to improve in the new court-ordered primary where only two candidates are on the ballot.
That is part of the reason why both campaigns devoted large amounts of time and resources in the past three weeks boosting the absentee numbers.
Depending on the outcome of the new primary and future court proceedings, Bridgeport voters may be asked to return to the polls in February for a new general election, which would likely feature a fourth matchup between Ganim and Gomes.
I'll admit to mispeaking about convictions vice cases, but there have been convictions (see below) also. Other than that, the point is the system down there has a massive problem with fraud. Partially in stuffing drop boxes with bogus ballots. The question was asked about proof of drop box stuffing. I posted an article showing drop box stuffing. Whatever happened in court is secondary and not part of it. The discussion was about bogus ballots, so let's not get lost in the weeds. I appreciate the time and research you did and while welcome, I don't see any reason to pursue that point. Dimsum acknowledged my post and he appears to be satisfied bogus ballots and drop box stuffing are a real thing. I'll accept responsibility for the confusion.While there may or may not be "lots of convictions" for this very thing (still to see any evidence), the case you provided as an example did not culminate in "a conviction". There was a "judgement" enter in this civil case that resulted in ordering a new primary for the Democratic party nomination for mayor.
View attachment 87235
Even with the redo, the result was the same. But then a cursory glance at Bridgeport municipal politics would elicit a 'WTF' regardless of whatever outcome. It's obviously a Dem's town and within the party it's an eat your young game.
Some interesting quotes from a local report on the later mayoral election(s),
![]()
Ganim, Gomes in Bridgeport election again. Whatās changed?
A new election between Bridgeport Mayor Joe Ganim and his Democratic opponent John Gomes was scheduled for Jan. 23 after a state Superior Court judge concluded that last yearās primary between the two men was marred by widespread ballot fraud.www.ctpublic.org
And still mayor.
Or you missed the point that they are taking the mickey out of people who fear that Trump really means he is going to be a dictator on day one.āDictator on day oneā shirts next to a table with āCome and Take Itā and āDonāt Tread on Meā flags.
Irony is dead.
Americans (in general) are not known for sarcasm. This is the country that had folks clutching pearls about litter boxes in classrooms for kids.Or you missed the point that they are taking the mickey out of people who fear that Trump really means he is going to be a dictator on day one.
Some states have absolutely deplorable voting registries, that one could drive a truck through.I remember after the 2020 election, Steve Crowder did an investigative report where he acquired a voter roll through FOIA and entered addresses into FedEx shipping cost estimator, and any that came back undeliverable he sent someone to check it out. A bunch of addresses turned out to not exist, most were either a vacant lot or the number was skipped in the sequence.
Twitter took it down as "unverified" even though the entire segment was the verification.
Well, typing as someone on the planet who wonders what he meant, I can say you're not reading my mind correctly, so maybe it's not quite as absolute as you sayEveryone on the planet knowsTrump was tongue in cheek when responding to the accusations he'd be a dictator when he said with a smile: "only on day one".
Was the tongue in cheek part that he would be a dictator, or only on day one?Everyone on the planet knows Trump was tongue in cheek when responding to the accusations he'd be a dictator when he said with a smile: "only on day one".
Well, when his staff had to clarify his remarks with āwhat he really meant wasā¦ā multiple times during his tenure as POTUS, starting with the āalternative factsā gem about the crowd at his inauguration, Iām disinclined to believe that even he knows what heās talking about half the time.That was a tough one for y'all, hey?