- Reaction score
- 8,067
- Points
- 1,160
I thought this was sufficiently noteworthy to justify its own thread. Feel free to merge it with Ukraine.
How long will that approval take @Colin Parkinson ?
China is part of a consortium that owns LNGCanada being built in KitimatIsn't Red China building one on the west coast?
When KitmatLNG was proposed in 1999, it was going to be a LNG import facility as we were going to run out of domestic NG in 10-15 years, thanks to that evil Fracking, Canada can now export LNG for at least 70 years. It was quickly reapplied for as a export terminal in 2001 as I recall. That project was taken over by Chevron, who have basically abandoned for now. There are about 6 LNG proposals in sleep mode in Kitmat and Prince Rupert. I suspect at least one more will be restarted once KLNG goes online. The bands that signed agreements with LNGC and Coastal Gaslink (pipeline) will start seeing considerable revenue flow into their coffers and that lesson will not be lost on other FN.Looks like it's the only one in existence in Canada, so far, but would need to be reconfigured for export, which is bizarre:
Canadian LNG Projects
Canada’s only operational LNG terminal (an import terminal) is Canaport LNG’s regasification import terminal located in Saint John, New Brunswick.
Canadian liquified natural gas projects
There are seven liquefied natural gas (LNG) export projects and one infrastructure project in various stages of development in Canada.www.nrcan.gc.ca
When KitmatLNG was proposed in 1999, it was going to be a LNG import facility as we were going to run out of domestic NG in 10-15 years, thanks to that evil Fracking, Canada can now export LNG for at least 70 years. It was quickly reapplied for as a export terminal in 2001 as I recall. That project was taken over by Chevron, who have basically abandoned for now. There are about 6 LNG proposals in sleep mode in Kitmat and Prince Rupert. I suspect at least one more will be restarted once KLNG goes online. The bands that signed agreements with LNGC and Coastal Gaslink (pipeline) will start seeing considerable revenue flow into their coffers and that lesson will not be lost on other FN.
Depending on the groundwork done, at least 4 years to complete the EA phase, as ground investigations (geotech, Archaeology, land claims, SARA listed species, water quality, etc) will have to be done prior so they can be reviewed during the EA and information gaps identified. The companies can help themselves by applying for permits to study the potentiel routes now and hire local FN to help with the studies and share that information with all bands that have Land Claims/treaties along the proposed routes. Then another 6 months to a year to get through the technical design phase to get regulatory permits, major modules can be ordered up at this point which generally have a 18-36 month lead time.
How long will that approval take @Colin Parkinson ?
Hell. The First Nations just have to look at the money Russia is making from its enemies in transit fees and storage costs. Even European contracts are hard to break.
And Prince Rupert is a long way from Europe - Panama, Suez or the Capes?
Depending on the groundwork done, at least 4 years to complete the EA phase, as ground investigations (geotech, Archaeology, land claims, SARA listed species, water quality, etc) will have to be done prior so they can be reviewed during the EA and information gaps identified. The companies can help themselves by applying for permits to study the potentiel routes now and hire local FN to help with the studies and share that information with all bands that have Land Claims/treaties along the proposed routes. Then another 6 months to a year to get through the technical design phase to get regulatory permits, major modules can be ordered up at this point which generally have a 18-36 month lead time.
Some key issues
Cumulative impacts from multiple projects in the terminal area and pipeline routes?
Is dredging required for the terminal and access routes, is the dredge spoil contaminated and if so with what and how much, then where does it go?
Are there marine shipping and sea mammal impacts? A Termpol needs to be completed
is the Terminal in a geohazard area or is their critical habitat in that area?
Cost is King. If we can produce it and ship it cheaply and reliably, no one will care where it comes from or is going to.
While some of the regs need to go/be fixed (looking at you EC Water Quality Standards & Bill 67) if everyone comes to the table willing to work together and be honest, it will still take time, but you end up with a far better project that will last a long time. My friend was road engineer for CanFor, when the BC Forest Practise code came into effect (first time around) the forest companies whined and gnashed their teeth, but my friend pointed out their forest road maintenance cost dropped significantly, to the point they were saving money. Also helped by changes in bridge tech (modular steel/concrete bridges). The same tech effect is helping pipeline companies who can now HDD drill crossings that they never could do before and saves them a lot of headache maintaining stream crossings.Respect Colin - but that is if all the rules in the rule books are deemed to be necessary.
Why are those approx 6 LNG proposals in sleep mode? (Just genuinely curious, is all)When KitmatLNG was proposed in 1999, it was going to be a LNG import facility as we were going to run out of domestic NG in 10-15 years, thanks to that evil Fracking, Canada can now export LNG for at least 70 years. It was quickly reapplied for as a export terminal in 2001 as I recall. That project was taken over by Chevron, who have basically abandoned for now. There are about 6 LNG proposals in sleep mode in Kitmat and Prince Rupert. I suspect at least one more will be restarted once KLNG goes online. The bands that signed agreements with LNGC and Coastal Gaslink (pipeline) will start seeing considerable revenue flow into their coffers and that lesson will not be lost on other FN.
“Not sure what to tell you President Zelinsky, but - yupp, sounds just like our guy to do this…”I thought this was sufficiently noteworthy to justify its own thread. Feel free to merge it with Ukraine.
Yet, Trudeau won't care. Nobody in Ukraine will be voting for him in the next election.I honestly would want to k iw what our Ambassador said in our defense. There's no salvaging this diplomatically. Not while Ukraine still exists in a state of war.
Hopefully no one in Canada will be either.Yet, Trudeau won't care. Nobody in Ukraine will be voting for him in the next election.