Army.ca
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
Search
Army.ca's Fallen Comrades

They shall grow not old, as we that are left grow old


Online Users
519 Guests, 26 Users (2 Hidden)
HULK_011, Remius, missing1, Bruce Monkhouse, Journeyman, Hamish Seggie, Crossfire, eorceme, tiboute, Terrier, FSTO, Pickle Rick, coyote489, Baden Guy, WR, LunchMeat, Tango2Bravo, Chanada, ridsteram, EME421, kratz, Furniture, ModlrMike, infantry 007
Statistics
Total Members: 66,563
Total Posts: 1,435,050
Total Topics: 71,459
Total Categories: 13
Total Boards: 124
Twitter Feed
Recent Topics
[Canadian Politics] Ontario Election: New riding and choices. by Remius Today at 08:51:12
[Military Administration] CFPAS – All things PER, PDR, software ect… [MERGED] by HULK_011 Today at 08:42:57
[US Military] Marines Reorganize Infantry For High-Tech Warfare by tomahawk6 Today at 07:18:21
[The Canadian Military] Retention vs Recruiting by SupersonicMax Today at 06:33:54
[Military Police Branch] MP recruiting 2017/18 by Applicant1990 Today at 03:53:41
[Military Administration] New IRP / Move policy-effective Dec 01, 2017 [Merged] by Infanteer Today at 01:54:59
[VAC and other Soldiers' Benefits] Any experience claiming damaged/less functional nose? by Rubes Today at 01:52:13
[Military Police Branch] Is CFSPDB not used to its full potential by Dimsum Yesterday at 22:56:51
[International Defence and Security] Chinese Military,Political and Social Superthread by Retired AF Guy Yesterday at 21:45:07
[RMC, CMR, ROTP] University Training Plan NCM (UTPNCM)-NCM to Officer [MERGED] by avn188 Yesterday at 20:51:52
[Uniforms] Royal Blue Hackle by Good2Golf Yesterday at 20:40:20
[Physical Training & Standards] Bettering Fitness Standards while Waiting for BMQ by BeyondTheNow Yesterday at 19:39:07
[Recruiting] Selection Dates by Milerup Yesterday at 18:36:57
[Air Force General] Canadian Airshows - Dates/Pictures/News by mariomike Yesterday at 14:02:01
[Naval Trades] Marine Technician ( MARTECH ) by HammerHeart Yesterday at 13:43:51
Army.ca Administration

xx The Warning System

April 26, 2018, 14:53:06 by Scott
Next to the Staff turnover last year, the largest change we've had is in how we apply and manage warnings. In the old days, it was by manually slapping a huge banner on a user's account, writing it up and then manually removing it when the time came. The new approach is simpler and more transparent, for everyone. It's also streamlined to keep the Staff from becoming bogged down in managing warnings.

Overview:
  • A 0% warning can be used if a "warning shot" is needed, with no impact.
  • Users may apply a +5% warning to another user via the MilPoints Assessment screen, this falls into line with our users policing users approach.
  • At 10% a user is added to a watch list for the staff.
  • At 25% a user is moderated (all posts must be approved)
  • At 50%+ a user is muted (they cannot post)
  • Warnings automatically decay at a rate of 10% per day.
  • Each Staff can apply no more than 50% to a given user, on a given day.
  • This means any Staff can mute a user immediately, but concurrence from another Staff is required to keep it in place.
  • E.G. A user with 70% warning will be unable to post for 2 days, and back to normal usage in 7 days.
  • A user's entire warning history is displayed on the warning screen.
  • Staff can decrease warning % at any time.
  • All messages and warnings are logged, this helps any review process.

If you receive a warning that you wish to dispute, PM me and I will look into it. Please do not PM any Staff you see online. We're trying, as much as possible, to streamline how we handle matters like this, and a common approach is what is required.

Any questions, don't hesitate to contact me.
0 comments | Write Comment
Army.ca News


xx CAF Rank Structure vs Unified Ranks

April 17, 2018, 19:47:12 by Neso
This is a random hypothetical that has crossed my mind:

Would the CAF (or any Military really) be more or less effective had it adopted a "unified/singular" rank structure along the lines of the RCMP, or most any police force, and why?

Why have Militaries historically separated their non-commissioned and commissioned rank structure into distinct career paths, while police forces produce their Commissioned Officers by promoting their Staff Sergeants to Senior Commissioned Officer ranks such as Inspector, and therefore do not have Junior Commissioned Officers?

On the surface at least it would seem to be a good thing that the Commissioned Officers "know the job" and started at the very bottom.

Thanks in advance for the insight folks

4 comments | Write Comment


xx Command and Control - Radio Silence

January 23, 2018, 18:55:06 by Chris Pook
Found on Facebook by Mark Bossi

Quote
Radio Silence – A Lesson in Mission Command
Contributor: Will has 6 years of hands on infantry leadership experience
While practising radio silence on a recent exercise I realised just how reliant I had become on technology. It had made me lazy and more controlling than I would like to admit.

In Eastern Europe 2014 a column of Mechanised and Air Mobile forces from the Ukrainian Army was struck by a devastating rocket bombardment lasting only 3 minutes. The result was over 100 casualties and many vehicles destroyed.  It initially seemed as if the column had been targeted with Electronic Warfare (EW) assets; a sensor that detects radio transmissions and sends the location back to the rocket battery for targeting.  This is a worrying prospect for any military commander; that enemy artillery could home in on a radio transmission. This development leads us to adapt and overcome.  An easy way to combat enemy EW capabilities would be to impose radio silence; an exercise often talked about, but rarely actually done.  Up to now in my career I had never exercised radio silence and I found the concept of not being able to communicate with my subordinates during a task uncomfortable. So, on a recent exercise we gave the enemy forces EW and an artillery capability, forcing us to impose radio silence.  What I learned was much more than how to combat EW and the technicalities of imposing radio silence, but a lesson in leadership, mission command and empowerment.

The first mission, anti-armour ambush, I briefed as I usually would with a clear intent and key timings, but also imposed radio silence. Overall the action went well and the task was performed to the same standard as it would be using radios throughout. However, the ambush was sprung on a lone enemy vehicle moving along the track.  The team understood the intent: destroy enemy armour, and acted. However, a larger column came through later untouched. With radios, I would have said: ‘hold fire,’ on the lone vehicle. More detail in my brief covering all eventualities would have prevented this. Here I discovered that radios had made me lazy in my briefing because I knew I could control it well during the action.

So, for the next exercise I made sure I considered all eventualities and briefed the commanders applying more timings and constraints where necessary. When can you break radio silence? What should you do if you lose comms? What should you do if you get cut off? And if all else fails, destroy all enemy tanks and meet back at the rendezvous No Later Than 0230hrs.  This time I witnessed several changes in the unit. I saw junior commanders making decisions, good decisions, without any direction from me. One of the teams missed their pick up and rather than speak on the radio trying to rearrange it they carried out their task on foot successfully. Other teams encountered difficulties during the mission but they knew the intent and end state and were able to complete their tasks without further direction for 36hrs of radio silence.

Overall it was a liberating exercise. It showed me that my subordinates are incredibly intelligent, capable soldiers who, when empowered, given a clear intent and detailed set of constraints can be released on task and will carry it out to a high standard without further direction. All I needed to do was trust them. It was also a relief for them not hearing me over the radio always asking for an update. Radio silence is the ultimate exercise in mission command and is tactically relevant. Try asking yourself: Am I enquiring because I need to or because I can?

https://wavellroom.com/2017/12/14/radio-silence-a-lesson-in-mission-command/
24 comments | Write Comment
Military Quote
An army without culture is a dull-witted army, and a dull-witted army cannot defeat the enemy.

- Mao Tse-Tung

Viewed 73176 times.
       


» Download the iPhone/iPad Military Quotes app! «


Military Word Of The Day
FDM
:
frequency division multiplexing


» Download the iPhone/iPad Military Terms app! «


Today in Military History

May 24



1819:

Queen Victoria born


1944:

MELFA CROSSING, effective dates for battle honour begin (to 25 May 44)


1944:

VC won by Maj John Keefer Mahoney, The Westminster Regiment (Motor), Melfa River, Italy




» Download the iPhone/iPad Military History app! «


Advertising
Army.ca's Supporters

Subscriber Status Board