- Reaction score
- 15,001
- Points
- 1,160
Do you have any heart left? How much kit is bought without a political calculation?I get terrible heartburn when less capable items are bought for political reasons, rather than the CAF getting the proper kit.
Do you have any heart left? How much kit is bought without a political calculation?I get terrible heartburn when less capable items are bought for political reasons, rather than the CAF getting the proper kit.
We did not buy 60Rs because Sikorsky did not offer them- they only offered the 92.TBH I really can't fathom why the RCAF/RCN didn't come back to Sikorsky and say - thanks but we'd really like to see something in the SH-60 model
But was the original EH-101 supposed to do SAR, and MH ASW?
…add in that there was an option for 15 more to replace the original Chinooks. NTH (New Transport Helicopter) was the short-lived project.We did not buy 60Rs because Sikorsky did not offer them- they only offered the 92.
Best ask the Liberal Government of 2004 why the Merlin was not selected.
Yes, the original concept was that 50 x EH-101 would replace both Sea King and Labradors. In hindsight, it would have been a bargain…
That would have worked, too. Not as good as a hook, but not horrible, either.…add in that there was an option for 15 more to replace the original Chinooks. NTH (New Transport Helicopter) was the short-lived project.
You mean the ‘common configuration’ NATO chopper that had 17 different configurations?Now now, that smacks of the MRH-90 that the ADF just decided to retire early![]()
Pffftttt…We did not buy 60Rs because Sikorsky did not offer them- they only offered the 92.
Best ask the Liberal Government of 2004 why the Merlin was not selected.
Yes, the original concept was that 50 x EH-101 would replace both Sea King and Labradors. In hindsight, it would have been a bargain…
Two words: "Cadillac elicopters"Pffftttt…
I mean paying $500 million in cancellation penalties only to not get any helicopters only seems like bad financial management in hindsight…
At the time, I’m sure it seemed like a stroke of pure genius!
Using a common airframe to replace both helicopters? Streamlining the aircrew & maintenance training pipeline towards one airframe instead of two?
C’mon man, that’s just crazy.
I think in actual fact it was $157.8 million but still a bad decision that haunts us to this day. Hopefully we can avoid something similar and just pick the F-35. I'm sure the Gripen is a fine plane but what would we call it as we already have oneI mean paying $500 million in cancellation penalties only to not get any helicopters only seems like bad financial management in hindsight…
You d do realise that is probably the actual reason they may use not to buy it. As opposed to the one they give to the public.I think in actual fact it was $157.8 million but still a bad decision that haunts us to this day. Hopefully we can avoid something similar and just pick the F-35. I'm sure the Gripen is a fine plane but what would we call it as we already have one
I think I had read, in more than one place, that when all of the costs came in, the number was higher. It’s been ages and I could very well be wrong - your number sounds a lot more reasonable. And preciseI think in actual fact it was $157.8 million but still a bad decision that haunts us to this day. Hopefully we can avoid something similar and just pick the F-35. I'm sure the Gripen is a fine plane but what would we call it as we already have one
Think of the money we can save an entire CAF's of Gripens and GriffonsYou d do realise that is probably the actual reason they may use not to buy it. As opposed to the one they give to the public.
Expect a 1500 page press release when they do get to making the decision either way.
Ill take a look Im sure I have it book marked or down loaded somewhereI think I had read, in more than one place, that when all of the costs came in, the number was higher. It’s been ages and I could very well be wrong - your number sounds a lot more reasonable. And precise
I wish I had $157.5 million dollars that I could just turn into a pile, douse with gasoline, light on fire, and just watch it burn without caring all that much.
Must be nice…
They didn't mention that the reason for that is foreign orders. LocMart can't build anymore any faster...Pentagon cutting F35 orders by 35%?
An indication that there was no there there?
F35s were built to defeat sophisticated air defence systems. But what if there are no sophisticated air defence systems? What if the shambles in Ukraine is the reality. Why spend money on that capability? Add to the fleet because it is useful in many other ways but with a reduced threat and emerging alternate solutions (Drones, LAMs, UCAVs and LRPFs) perhaps there is less of need to put so much money on that bet?
Apparently I can't get behind the paywall. Perhaps someone else will have better luck
They didn't mention that the reason for that is foreign orders. LocMart can't build anymore any faster...
Fixed it for youWhen talking EH101, there are both sunk costs already paid, plus cancellation penalties.
With two small bespoke fleets, both reduced by crashes, and problems with supply chains because both are bespoke, it may be time for the CAF to once again try to buy a single fleet, but this time an off the shelf, already in US service model... If nothing else, it would boost defence spending.