- Reaction score
- 6,745
- Points
- 1,260
Kenny Chiu is in a nomination race against someone (Beijing-friendly) accusing him of dividing the Chinese community.
www.thebureau.news
Sorry, paywalled from the Globe…
Politicians throughout the modern period (Chrétien, Trump, Trudeau) have often gotten out of scandal by responding “the police haven’t laid charges”, like that makes their ethical…”flexibility” acceptable. And the voters have often let them skate (“Well nothing illegal happened…”).
www.theglobeandmail.com
Hogue Report Fuels Renewed Attacks on Kenny Chiu as Conservative Nomination Battle Intensifies
Contestant Wai Young alleges Chiu “divided the community” with “careless” remarks that fueled anti-Asian racism—claims contradicted by evidence presented in the Hogue Inquiry
Sorry, paywalled from the Globe…
Politicians throughout the modern period (Chrétien, Trump, Trudeau) have often gotten out of scandal by responding “the police haven’t laid charges”, like that makes their ethical…”flexibility” acceptable. And the voters have often let them skate (“Well nothing illegal happened…”).
Opinion: No traitors in the House, but foreign interference, and the Liberals’ non-response to it, is still a serious concern
Somewhere amid all the plans and protocols, the government seemed to lose sight of the objective: protecting Canadians
There’s no evidence Mr. Dong knew about or participated in the scheme. And certainly Justice Hogue appears to have cleared him of the most serious charge against him: that he suggested to a consular official that China hold onto the Two Michaels – the two Canadian businessmen held hostage nearly three years on trumped-up charges – rather than release them, supposedly for fear of validating the hardline approach favoured by the Conservatives.
But that hardly extinguishes all concerns. Maybe Mr. Dong said nothing improper in the conversation, which was recorded by Canadian intelligence. But why was he talking to officials of the People’s Republic at all, at such a sensitive time, and without the government’s knowledge? Why was China so eager that he win the nomination in Don Valley North? And why was the Prime Minister, apprised mid-campaign of intelligence concerns about the nomination, so lackadaisical in response?
Well, we know one reason: as he told the inquiry himself, nomination meetings are stacked in this way all the time. But that only points to the broader seriousness of the issue. If a foreign power could tilt the nomination in Don Valley North, a safe Liberal riding, it could do so in others. The process by which we nominate candidates, always an ethical disgrace, has become a serious security risk.
And the Prime Minister’s lack of curiosity in the Dong affair is only one example, among many in the report, of intelligence warnings that either went missing, or were not passed on, or were passed on but weren’t read, or were read but simply unheeded. This, remember, was after the 2016 U.S. election had alerted everyone to the risk, or rather the reality, of foreign interference.
The only reason anyone knows about any of this, let’s recall, is because the information was leaked to the press, presumably by intelligence officials distressed at the government’s inactivity on the file. Had it not been, presumably the government itself, in its invincible blindness, would have remained as unaware as everyone else. But still – not treasonous!

