- Reaction score
- 8,058
- Points
- 1,160
.
Last edited:
Many? Which “many”? Be specific.There are many issues were provinces over step into federal domain, and try and dictate terms. AB and pipelines is a prime example, the feds can't speak for the other provinces. AB having sheriff's waste resources to try and take over policing the border, when that's federal domain is another
CBSA work at ports of entry, save for some inland criminal investigations. Border enforcement between POE using Customs Act and Immigration provisions is RCMP. All I know about Alberta’s teams is from reading in the news, but my understanding is they’ve basically sent teams to work in the border area using existing criminal law authorities (eg drug trafficking and exporting, firearms trafficking, human trafficking), plus some provincial commercial vehicle enforcement powers. In the course of this they also have some tools and tech and will be able to call in other stuff they see but for which they may lack legal authorities (such as straight Customs or IRPA stuff). So, to my distant eye, it augments federal policing roles, but doesn’t usurp them. Overlap between federal policing and provincial/municipal is by no means unheard of. I don’t see an overreach issue here. There’s valid provincial concern at play too.Many? Which “many”? Be specific.
On pipelines, Alberta neither dictated, nor strayed into Federal Jurisdiction.
There was a naive belief that the federal government would enforce the part of the constitution concern works crossing provincial borders, but alas-no, they didn’t.
As for the border: perhaps the feds should hire the 2-3000 more CBSA officers that have been recommended for years. Alberta actually has better things to do than that.
For the record, I think Smith is a muppet and I do not think very much of her government.
I'm no constitutional expert but number 1 - 3 seem kinda 'federaly'.Many? Which “many”? Be specific.
On pipelines, Alberta neither dictated, nor strayed into Federal Jurisdiction.
There was a naive belief that the federal government would enforce the part of the constitution concern works crossing provincial borders, but alas-no, they didn’t.
As for the border: perhaps the feds should hire the 2-3000 more CBSA officers that have been recommended for years. Alberta act.ually has better things to do than that.
For the record, I think Smith is a muppet and I do not think very much of her government.
"I demand my province gets to set policy for other provinces"I'm no constitutional expert but number 1 - 3 seem kinda 'federaly'.
Please go read section 92a of Constitution Act and then come back once you have and see if you still want to make the same comment."I demand my province gets to set policy for other provinces"
And how does this negate that BC has jurisdiction over the management of their coastal resources? Alberta is trying to force BC in one way or another, which is hypocritical, regardless if I think that BC should play ball.Please go read section 92a of Constitution Act and then come back once you have and see if you still want to make the same comment.
Where does section 92A state that a Province has jurisdiction over marine waters?And how does this negate that BC has jurisdiction over the management of their coastal resources? Alberta is trying to force BC in one way or another, which is hypocritical, regardless if I think that BC should play ball.
The province has control of everything right up to the water, which gives BC the jurisdiction here, I said coastal, I didnt say marine.Where does section 92A state that a Province has jurisdiction over marine waters?
What does the constitution say about powers not otherwise allocated? (Hint- the feds get them)
Sorry, I misunderstood you.The province has control of everything right up to the water, which gives BC the jurisdiction here, I said coastal, I didnt say marine.
Look, I think BC should play ball but forcing them into it by dogwhistling separatist shit ain't the way to do it. Maybe Alberta could try to negotiate in good faith and make a deal with BC and their stakeholders instead of having their Premier stoke up the lunatics on the right-fringe of her Party.
All good haha, Mondays.Sorry, I misunderstood you.
I hum and haw on that one. On balance I think I agree, but she has spent far too much time convening with MAGA loons and far too much time boosting separatist talking points for me to write off completely that she is some sort of Manchurian candidate trying to split up Canada.And I fully agree with you on the second part. For the record, I don’t think she is a separatist, but she is playing with fire.
Sorry, I misunderstood you.
And I fully agree with you on the second part. For the record, I don’t think she is a separatist, but she is playing with fire.
From what's been in the media from experts, your acquaintances are probably wrong.People I know who work in the healthcare system state the changes happening will improve service in AB. There remains a lot of institutional resistance, which when you de-centralize control that tends to happen.
I’m not familiar enough to know if the changes will do that or not.People I know who work in the healthcare system state the changes happening will improve service in AB. There remains a lot of institutional resistance, which when you de-centralize control that tends to happen.
From what's been in the media from experts, your acquaintances are probably wrong.
As opposed to your chosen "experts"?Ah... the media and the media's chosen "experts".
Yeah…or take over Crown responsibility for Treaty obligations of First Nations people in the province…Sure. Which province is attempting to create it’s own armed forces?