• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Liberal Minority Government 2025 - ???

That's just it, he talks big when it counts, but doesn't deliver when it matters. His real agenda lies with the WEF, making Brookfield richer and to say the right words so the "elbowsup" section of the population keeps blindly voting Liberal. Canada is on the same downward trajectory as it was with Trudeau, same circus just a different leader.
There are a few people here who get it, but I've gone on so many angry rants about the WEF & their ilk I just found like a conspiracy theorist (which I am self admittedly, but most of that is just me trying to bring actual facts to light that the MSM tries to bury or ignore)

Carney played the all too easy "The Americans are trying to screw us over, but don't worry...I'll fight back & I have all this international experience to draw from!" card, to make a name for himself at a time when the LPC was headed towards non-party status...

It caught people's attention. And it clarified a crisis in people's minds, while heavily suggesting that Carney was the only viable option if Canadians still wanted to have a country in a few months.

The typical 'create problem + create solution = me' politician card - saw right through it the moment be said it. (It was the smirk he gave after he turned from the crowd that did it for me)


---

But like you've said, Carney's loyalty is to the WEF primarily, Brookfield secondly, and Canadians thirdly. (Oh but thanks for my 1% tax cut...ffs)

Still no word on the Green Slush Fund investigation, or any mention of the money being paid back.

(Sorry Lumber, I kmow you've offered extremely detailed summaries of what actually happened. And I'll believe you any day against the narrative of the mainstream media. But thats a lot of potential criminality & a shit ton of money, I just wish I had some sort of official comment from the RCMP that they have dropped their investigation...which I dont think they've stated either way yet?)

Still no real progress on getting tariffs lifted from the US or China (for a guy who's super connected to the CCP, he sure hasn't done much about getting those tariffs removed...)

(I have a gut feeling that our 2 biggest trading partners both slapping heavy tariffs on us at the same time means we probably did something stupid and underhanded, and the government didn't bother to say anything to the public...those 'media subsidies' sure do buy a fair bit of loyalty...)


---

Carney is significantly more likeable than Trudeau. Even I wanna like the guy, and to a certain point I do like him (more than Justin anyway, but not as my Prime Minister)

Even at the G7 last week in Kananaskis, I was present at the lodge briefly and personally witnessed him shaking the hands and thanking all of the staff, apologizing for all of the extra security checks, pat downs, vehicle searches, etc etc.

He thanked them all for "putting up with them" and seemed genuinely nice about it, with smiles and laughs all around. (Like I said, I really do wanna like the guy!)




But at the end of the day, you are 100% right. Carney, like Trudeau & Freeland & Gould (and I imagine Guilbeau), is loyal to the WEF agenda...

There is a reason why the LPC always crams a bunch of crazy shit into their proposed bills that are always called something warm & fluffy, in which their titles don't reflect what's actually included in the proposed bill...

(Yet 100% of the time so far has been stripping away individual rights of Canadian citizens under the guise of protecting them...every. single. time.)


AH
e wants to spend even more money than Trudeau, yet won't release a budget and won't tell the country what the 'big goal' is to justify spending all this money & digging us even deeper into national debt.

For anybody who finds themselves numb while reading this...maybe this will slap you out of the apathy this last decade has caused...

Trudeau spent more money than all previous Prime Ministers combined - and Mr. Carney wants to spend even more

If we are to judge a tree by the fruit it bears, this fruit seems pretty much the same as the last fruit. Namely...

- Spend tons of money above & beyond what the government brings in in tax revenue, but with no clear declaration as to what that money is actually being spent on & a general public that wants to see some sort of tangible phenomena in exchange for the public purse

- Propose legislation titled to address one thing, then sneakily cram a bunch of other crazy nonsense into the same bill because they couldn't get passed if they proposed it on it's own


So more spending to help bankrupt us even further, and more government power for them to watch & monitor us at an individual level even more.

Carney's statements about becoming an energy superpower are in direct opposition to his other comments about Net Zero, his various initiatives on climate change, etc.

(And true to his WEF ilk, I see he hasn't lifted the tanker ban on the west coast yet. Shocking.)




I WANT to trust the guy and feel better about things. But so far, his actions haven't won me over...leaps & bounds more palatable than Trudeau, but I'm not remotely sold yet that he isn't here to finish the job.

But yeah, "elbows up" or whatever it is people say now... (wtf does that even mean anyway?)
 
(Sorry Lumber, I kmow you've offered extremely detailed summaries of what actually happened. And I'll believe you any day against the narrative of the mainstream media. But thats a lot of potential criminality & a shit ton of money, I just wish I had some sort of official comment from the RCMP that they have dropped their investigation...which I dont think they've stated either way yet?)
Thank you for the shout-out so I don't have to go over this again. :D
 
That's just it, he talks big when it counts, but doesn't deliver when it matters. His real agenda lies with the WEF, making Brookfield richer and to say the right words so the "elbowsup" section of the population keeps blindly voting Liberal. Canada is on the same downward trajectory as it was with Trudeau, same circus just a different leader.
Going down same path as the UK.
 
Going down same path as the UK.
I can tell you right now, I WILL NOT EVER arrest someone for posting a meme, or if they make a comment about being frustrated with excessive illegal immigration & the issues it causes the locals...

Not a chance in hell. I'd go back to working at Dairy Queen before I ever participate in that shit.




A system is only as good as the people who work in that system. I hope, and almost just f**king demand, that we do a whole lot better than they are doing right now...
 
Trudeau spent more money than all previous Prime Ministers combined
I can't find any support for that contention:
Table 1 presents the rankings of prime ministers based on the average annual change in per-person spending from the year before they took office as prime minister to their last budget. Based on the analysis employed, Sir Robert Borden ranks as having the highest average annual increase in per-person spending (12.8%). This increase is obviously linked to the added spending undertaken to support Canada’s role in World War I. The prime minister with the second highest average annual rise in per-person spending was William Lyon Mackenzie King. Mackenzie King’s second term as prime minister (1935 to 1948) was heavily affected by both the Great Depression and World War II. In fact, once the run-up linked to World War II is excluded from his tenure, the per-person spending increases during this period were quite modest.

Figure 3 addresses the difficulty of comparing wartime expenditures and spending that was linked with the founding of the country at a time when government was quite limited with post-war conditions. It ranks only post World War II prime ministers on average annual changes in per person spending. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau recorded the second highest average annual increase in per person spending (6.8%). (In the ranking of all prime ministers, Justin Trudeau is 6th overall). Justin Trudeau’s spending record was influenced by the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 and 2021, but per-person spending was already at historic highs entering the pandemic
Nonetheless, the increase in per-person spending is egregious, and is the inescapable outcome of a self-involved and unaware people when led by a narcissistic unserious buffon like Trudeau.

Voters - this one is on you
 
Going down same path as the UK.

You'd think that after some time the peasants would riot and have the Kings head on a stick. Instead they just bend over and take it because one person or a few persons say so. Interesting society humanity has built for itself.
 
Those that hoped Carney would not tolerate underperformers and start cutting them out, might be getting their wish.


This stood out to me:

One of the insiders said there is frustration in the Carney PMO about the “muscle memory” of senior bureaucrats who seem more focused on process than outcomes. The source stressed, however, that there is no sense that they are opposed to the government’s agenda, but that they are caught up in “analysis paralysis.”

Too many in PS management are focused on inputs and processes, not on outputs.
 
This stood out to me:



Too many in PS management are focused on inputs and processes, not on outputs.
I once explained to my father how we purchased things in the CAF, IOT be in compliance with the FAA (including a side quest about PSPC, ISED, and TBS).

He told me it angered him immensly as a tax payer, and that if these processes were used in business, everyone would be fired for underperformance.
 
This stood out to me:



Too many in PS management are focused on inputs and processes, not on outputs.

We live paralysis by analysis everyday. If Carney's PMO recognizes this and is focused on outcomes that can be a great thing... I just don't trust the outcomes because it's still the LPC.
 
I once explained to my father how we purchased things in the CAF, IOT be in compliance with the FAA (including a side quest about PSPC, ISED, and TBS).

He told me it angered him immensly as a tax payer, and that if these processes were used in business, everyone would be fired for underperformance.
I’m sure many of these processes were put in place reduce corruption, protect workers and the environment and a whole host of other ostensibly good reasons. But things have gotten insane. Even so-called “abundance Democrats” see this as an issue.
 
This stood out to me:

Too many in PS management are focused on inputs and processes, not on outputs.
I think a lot of that is driven by politicians, political staffers and PMOs continually asking for more analysis before they make decisions, so they want a lot of analysis before they bring things up the chain (after getting smacked for not getting 3rd, 4th and 5th independent assessments).

If you keep kicking a dog you can't get mad at it for cringing when you walk in it's direction.
 
Really? my experience (32 years) is that bureaucrats and senior management are in a permanent CYA mode. Decisions are entirely based upon how it will look and not what is best.
I don’t think you’re wrong. I think all can be true. The question is why are they in permanent CYA mode? Because Something Bad happened so they put an extra layer of process to keep the Bad Thing from reoccurring. It also explains why no one below a DM is allowed to make a decision. Next thing you know, everything is bogged down in process. The only measurables are inputs.
 
This stood out to me:



Too many in PS management are focused on inputs and processes, not on outputs.
I’ve worked in Europe, the US and Canada. The 1 thing that I’ve disliked intensely about working in Canada vs in the US, the entire approach that nothing can get done without complete consensus/agreement by all parties involved. In the business world it can be crippling, lead to no sense of urgency, drive or in the worst case lack of understanding why something needs to get done. In the US I experienced the opposite, all sides were listened to but then the decision maker would bang the table and declare what the decision was and everyone then had their marching orders and the level of urgency needed to get to the finish line.
I miss still that 25yrs later and when I find it here in Toronto, more often than not it’s from someone who grew up in the Windsor-Chatham-Sarnia triangle because in my experiences, people from this area are hybrid AmeriCanadians, they have traits from both sides of the border and can work seamlessly in either place.
 
Back
Top