
I guess you missed where the DC Metro Chief of Police was fired for underreporting crime stats.
www.nbcwashington.com
I guess you missed that it wasn't the "Chief of Police" who was fired but that the Chieffiredsuspended a subordinate district commander. But never let facts interfere with a story.
![]()
DC police commander suspended, accused of changing crime statistics
A D.C. police commander is under investigation for allegedly making changes to crime statistics in his district. The Metropolitan Police Department confirmed Michael Pulliam was placed on paid administrative leave in mid-May. That happened just a week after Pulliam filed an equal employment...www.nbcwashington.com
The premise stands: A senior police official was manipulating stats to make it appear crime was down.
Some correct and verifiable ones, at least, preferably reported according to universally applied criteria. Not enough information driving public policy is subjected to the rigour of scientific method (ie. independent review and verification). This is natural - people like to do new things, not go over someone else's work. Governance is too important for that.I guess it is time to find some new facts then
The premise stands: A senior police official was manipulating stats to make it appear crime was down.
As a change up from a satire site, there is this non-partisan source, with a wide range of supporters from across the political spectrum.![]()
Democrat Mayors Report Violent Crime Down 40% Since They Redefined ‘Violent’ And ‘Crime’
U.S. — Despite claims by President Donald Trump that American cities are being overrun by criminals, Democrat mayors across the country reported that violent crime was actually down 40% since they redefined the words "violent" and "crime."babylonbee.com
Then why didn't you write that rather than apparently repeating some random, unattributed (and incorrect) comment. Were you trying to sound almost "presidential" or just emulating the practice of not bothering about facts?
Pot this is kettle.Keep yelling at the clouds while searching high and low for fly shit in pepper, nobody cares.
Significant difference between the actual chief and a subordinate.Keep yelling at the clouds while searching high and low for fly shit in pepper, nobody cares.
No, no, pretty sure that a Cpl in the tool crib at Cold Lake has the same authorities as the CDS.Significant difference between the actual chief and a subordinate.
The bones of the issue was whether it happened or not, rather than whodunnit.Significant difference between the actual chief and a subordinate.
Who took the action is foundational, not a mere detail.The bones of the issue was whether it happened or not, rather than whodunnit.
"I'm going to ignore/deprecate the foundational point of your evidence because you got this detail wrong."
No, no, pretty sure that a Cpl in the tool crib at Cold Lake has the same authorities as the CDS.
Significant difference between the actual chief and a subordinate.
The concept that the chief, on being informed of the issue, addressed it?It actually happened. Data was manipulated to represent lower crime and published as such. It doesn't matter if it was the chief or an inspector or the clerk. It occurred and there was an outcome.
You two really having trouble with that concept?
Not at all. You seem to have difficulty accepting the concept you were wrong.It actually happened. Data was manipulated to represent lower crime and published as such. It doesn't matter if it was the chief or an inspector or the clerk. It occurred and there was an outcome.
You two really having trouble with that concept?
Well to be fair, several US new networks reported it was the Chief at first.No, no, pretty sure that a Cpl in the tool crib at Cold Lake has the same authorities as the CDS.
To say nothing of a SNCO in Cold Lake, whose powers are unlimitedNo, no, pretty sure that a Cpl in the tool crib at Cold Lake has the same authorities as the CDS.
When government functionaries are misleading the public, that's the story. It's not a tale of the life of so-and-so, in which the action is a detail.Who took the action is foundational, not a mere detail.