• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Liberal (Minority/Majority) Government 2025 - ???

Committees tend to bounce between in camera and public depending on what’s being discussed. Drafts of reports, for instance, will be discussed in camera to allow the committee to finalize.

Do the order papers for the committees on those dates give any indication of what was on the agenda? I would expect that of all the many parliamentary committees, at any given point there will be a few appropriately in camera for matters that merit it, before opening back public. Against historical committee activity are the past couple weeks anomalous?


I've been following this and reading into it a bit. Agreed committees do routinely go in camera for things like draft reports or sensitive testimony.

My concern is more around the pattern and timing. From what I can see in the order papers and notices not all of these sessions were clearly tied to routine drafting stages and the grouping across multiple committees at once raises eyebrows. Especially when you consider it includes committees on Access to Information, and Privacy and Ethics. Tell me that's not suspicious.

It’s reasonable to ask whether this level of simultaneous in camera activity is typical or if it departs from past practice enough to warrant closer scrutiny.
 
I've been following this and reading into it a bit. Agreed committees do routinely go in camera for things like draft reports or sensitive testimony.

My concern is more around the pattern and timing. From what I can see in the order papers and notices not all of these sessions were clearly tied to routine drafting stages and the grouping across multiple committees at once raises eyebrows. Especially when you consider it includes committees on Access to Information, and Privacy and Ethics. Tell me that's not suspicious.

It’s reasonable to ask whether this level of simultaneous in camera activity is typical or if it departs from past practice enough to warrant closer scrutiny.
Rog, thanks for that. Gives a bit more context. I wonder what was up.
 
'Fast tracked' hopefully doesn't mean 'quality check compromised'....

Text of the article. It gives some necessary context. Looks like they’re basically looking to stabilize Labour in key sectors in small labour markets they could face disproportionate disruption from TFW changes.

“More than 30,000 temporary foreign workers who live in small, remote and rural communities will be able to apply for a fast track to permanent residency, under an initiative announced Monday by Immigration Minister Lena Metlege Diab.

Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada will accelerate permanent residency, or PR, for up to 33,000 temporary foreign workers in “in-demand sectors” such as agriculture and natural resources, trades and transportation, and health and caregiving.
IRCC said it has already granted 3,600 foreign workers permanent residency in January and February under the program, before the formal launch.

Toronto immigration lawyer Ravi Jain questioned how the department had granted permanent residency to people under the program even before it was announced. “I’ve never seen this before in my career. Usually you make an announcement and then you get the criteria and then you advise clients if they qualify or not.”

He said the program as a whole was disappointing as the government is drawing candidates from existing permanent residency programs.

“This is a total nothing-burger,” Mr. Jain said.
Last year’s budget flagged that the government was planning a one-time initiative to swiftly approve permanent residency for 33,000 work permit holders in 2026 and 2027.

On Monday, IRCC said the program supports its efforts to reduce the share of temporary residents to less than 5 per cent of the population by the end of 2027.

In its immigration levels plan announced in the budget last year, the government said that it would aim to admit 385,000 temporary residents in 2026 – about 43 per cent fewer than its 2025 target – and 370,000 in 2027 and in 2028.

The program, called the In-Canada Workers Initiative, will accelerate applications from existing inventories of work-permit holders who have already applied for permanent residency and live in rural areas and communities with labour gaps. Foreign workers who have lived in smaller communities for two years or more in certain in-demand sectors will be eligible to apply
The fast-track to permanent residency will be available to people who have already applied to settle in Canada through provincial nominee programs, which allow provinces to select foreigners to settle. Caregivers who applied for permanent residency through a pilot would also qualify to be fast-tracked.
Foreigners who have applied to settle here through a pathway for skilled foreign workers and international student graduates who live in the four Atlantic provinces would also be eligible to have their applications accelerated.
The program would allow foreign nationals who applied under community immigration pilots. They would have to live and work in 18 select communities, including rural and francophone ones, to have their PR applications fast-tracked.

Also eligible to have their applications accelerated are those who applied to remain in Canada through IRCC’s agri-food pilot program for experienced, non-seasonal workers, in certain food and agriculture jobs such as farm supervision, meat processing, and greenhouse production.

The immigration department said in a statement that the program is designed to “address labour shortages” in smaller and rural communities.

“By transitioning temporary residents who are already living and contributing to their communities to permanent residence, we’re providing the certainty and the stability needed to maintain and grow vibrant local economies,” Ms. Metlege Diab said in a statement.

IRCC plans to transition at least 20,000 workers to permanent residence under the program in 2026, and the remainder in 2027.”
 
something to watch for tomorrow, if true, this is a major win for canadian aerospace

Nice! That’s the Bombardier C Series Airbus bought into. Built in Canada. There are already some 500 in service and with current orders (not counting this one) the fleet’s already set to double; they’re basically a 737 and E-190 competitor. This will be a substantial add to the global fleet.
 
Former governors general claimed $554K from expense account last year
Carney says he will look into whether allowance program needs greater transparency

The program, which launched in 1979 and has been shrouded in secrecy, allows each former governor general to bill up to $206,040 per year, on top of their pensions.

The government paid out $554,000 including taxes in reimbursements in the 2024-25 fiscal year to support five former governors general, Rideau Hall told CBC News.

The Governor General's office will not say who was reimbursed or what the money was spent on. Rideau Hall would only say that there are five living former governors general who can access the program.

Sounds like quite the scam. Each former GG can expense up to $206,040 per year, on top of their pensions.

At the very least Carney should order more transparency. Ideally, get rid of it.
 
Former governors general claimed $554K from expense account last year






Sounds like quite the scam. Each former GG can expense up to $206,040 per year, on top of their pensions.

At the very least Carney should order more transparency. Ideally, get rid of it.

Every Veteran with 12 or more years paid service can expense up to $90,000 for bullshit courses, on top of their pensions. I've seen retired Colonels take Cordon Bleu chef courses. Sounds like quite the scam.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ytz
Every Veteran (except 90% of Class A Reservists) with 12 or more years paid service can expense up to $90,000 for bullshit courses, on top of their pensions. I've seen retired Colonels take Cordon Bleu chef courses. Sounds like quite the scam.

There, dragged us into the 'Reserves' thread again for you ;)
 
Every Veteran with 12 or more years paid service can expense up to $90,000 for bullshit courses, on top of their pensions. I've seen retired Colonels take Cordon Bleu chef courses. Sounds like quite the scam.

So not a secret and hidden from public? That's not bad. I'll meet in the middle ground. Former GG's can expense $45,000 for their 5 years of service once.
 
Can't be great for the whole Liberal Party brand thing, such as it is, but the 'Dauphin' clearly does not GAF ...


Trudeau can live his post political life however he wants, but it will invariably reflect on his time in office

At present, Canada is not just walking back some policies implemented under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, but totally reversing course: We are slashing immigration, abandoning climate-change measures, shrinking the public service, rewriting bail and sentencing policy, scrapping planned changes to capital-gains taxation, spending big on national defence and so on. Canada is very much in the early stages of dealing with the last decade of mismanagement, during which, according to a just-published RBC report, $1-trillion in investment exited Canada, which constitutes “the largest capital exodus in Canadian history.” Under this long shadow, Mr. Trudeau is on a ski lift alongside Prince Harry, and dancing with Katy Perry at Coachella, which is the type of trip that, just one year ago, he encouraged Canadians to avoid in protest of the tariffs imposed by U.S. President Donald Trump. One might’ve expected just a touch more humility.

Mr. Trudeau can live his post prime-ministerial life however he wants, of course, and no one should fault him for deciding to have some fun. But the choice to share these escapades at a time when Canada is grappling with the effects of a half-dozen of his most disastrous policy decisions reveals something of his personal nature, and sheds some light on how Canada came to be in its current state. That is, it explains some things that the guy in a backwards cap slurping noodles at Coachella – with his girlfriend sharing photos of it all – was, barely over a year ago, the leader of a G7 nation. Just as it explains something of Mr. Bush’s tenure that no one around him, even in retirement, was brave enough to suggest he spend a few more years working on his technique before exhibiting his portraits.

We can’t expect anything of politicians when they leave public office, but we can notice their behaviours and reflect on them. This information tells us who we might want to lead our country in future, and who might be better left to the concert circuit.

Trudeau can live his postpolitical life however he wants, but it will invariably reflect on his time in office - The Globe and Mail
 
USA: We'll build libraries / museums for former presidents.

Canada: We hate former GGs.

Former national leaders should be encouraged and supported to remain engaged and involved in civic life.

Each GG is spending about the salary of a MWO IPC 4 (non spec) or Capt IPC 4 (GSO) (excluding employer costs and any allowances).

If you can guarantee me that there are not five MWO / Capt+ in the CAF who aren't pulling their weight, I will agree that support to former GGs should be kiboshed.

(I am not asking for a list of names ;) )
 
Can't be great for the whole Liberal Party brand thing, such as it is, but the 'Dauphin' clearly does not GAF ...


Trudeau can live his post political life however he wants, but it will invariably reflect on his time in office

At present, Canada is not just walking back some policies implemented under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, but totally reversing course: We are slashing immigration, abandoning climate-change measures, shrinking the public service, rewriting bail and sentencing policy, scrapping planned changes to capital-gains taxation, spending big on national defence and so on. Canada is very much in the early stages of dealing with the last decade of mismanagement, during which, according to a just-published RBC report, $1-trillion in investment exited Canada, which constitutes “the largest capital exodus in Canadian history.” Under this long shadow, Mr. Trudeau is on a ski lift alongside Prince Harry, and dancing with Katy Perry at Coachella, which is the type of trip that, just one year ago, he encouraged Canadians to avoid in protest of the tariffs imposed by U.S. President Donald Trump. One might’ve expected just a touch more humility.

Mr. Trudeau can live his post prime-ministerial life however he wants, of course, and no one should fault him for deciding to have some fun. But the choice to share these escapades at a time when Canada is grappling with the effects of a half-dozen of his most disastrous policy decisions reveals something of his personal nature, and sheds some light on how Canada came to be in its current state. That is, it explains some things that the guy in a backwards cap slurping noodles at Coachella – with his girlfriend sharing photos of it all – was, barely over a year ago, the leader of a G7 nation. Just as it explains something of Mr. Bush’s tenure that no one around him, even in retirement, was brave enough to suggest he spend a few more years working on his technique before exhibiting his portraits.

We can’t expect anything of politicians when they leave public office, but we can notice their behaviours and reflect on them. This information tells us who we might want to lead our country in future, and who might be better left to the concert circuit.

Trudeau can live his postpolitical life however he wants, but it will invariably reflect on his time in office - The Globe and Mail
Listen, if a significant portion of the country raises flags asking for people to fornicate with the man, I won't begrudge him for having fun with an objectively attractive pop star who decided to follow their instructions.
 
  • Humorous
Reactions: ytz
There, dragged us into the 'Reserves' thread again for you ;)
I specified paid years. A class A reservist who retires after 25 calendar years, with a year of cumulative class B (courses etc) and an average of 55 days class A per year would qualify for half that amount. (55 x 1.4 x 24 + 365 is just over six years paid time).

They would also have had access to the Reserve Educational Reimbursement program (in some ways a better deal than the VAC money, since unlike the VAC benefit it's not taxable) of 50% of tuition and books to a limit of $2k annually / $8k lifetime.
 
Every Veteran with 12 or more years paid service can expense up to $90,000 for bullshit courses, on top of their pensions. I've seen retired Colonels take Cordon Bleu chef courses. Sounds like quite the scam.

How is this a scam? It's an education benefit. Why do you care what people want to study after their military careers? Also, how would you even administer controls? We going to create a list of which ranks and which trades can study what topics after their career?

By the way, I know people that have done the actual cordon bleu diploma. It's actual chef training. Not just fancy cooking class.
 
USA: We'll build libraries / museums for former presidents.

The current President forces his security detail to rent rooms at full price in resorts he owns and racks up hundreds of thousands of dollars in bills. But we're complaining about GG's racking up the salary of a Captain in official expenses.
 
How is this a scam? It's an education benefit. Why do you care what people want to study after their military careers? Also, how would you even administer controls? We going to create a list of which ranks and which trades can study what topics after their career?

By the way, I know people that have done the actual cordon bleu diploma. It's actual chef training. Not just fancy cooking class.
My point is that GGs individually cost about the same as a single VAC education cost.

Probably not a huge drain on the public purse, relatively speaking.
 
Back
Top