• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Liberal (Minority/Majority) Government 2025 - ???

NORAD goes...

Then they start complaining about the "unprotected northern approaches" that Canada is doing nothing about...

Then... well I'll leave my tin foil hat off for now.

Would pausing this advisory group play into US hands somehow? I don't see how it could beyond a soundbite for their (and our) 51st state crowd.

Makes it easier for the U.S. to claim jus ad bellum in order to take action as it sees fit to secure Canadian territory in the name of U.S. defense and security.

Jus in bello and jus post bellum are minor details that may or may not be worried about by the current administration.
 
Makes it easier for the U.S. to claim jus ad bellum in order to take action as it sees fit to secure Canadian territory in the name of U.S. defense and security.

Jus in bello and jus post bellum are minor details that may or may not be worried about by the current administration.
I’ll contend the current administration is minimally concerned with any of those three. It does what it wants.
 
Last edited:
I don't get it.

Are we supposed to be upset?
It is a new factor to take into account if one is so inclined to better inform one's understanding of our most important binational relationship.

"Upset" is an emotion or mood. As Gurney Halleck once said: "What has mood to do with it? You fight when the necessity arises—no matter the mood! Mood’s a thing for cattle or making love or playing the baliset. It is not for fighting".
 
I was an attendee at / member of that Board a few times in my career. It was a unique construct that had a tendency to be periodically ignored / undervalued by both sides, and was often performative. Nonetheless, these kinds of linkages can go a long way to lubricating the gears of binational relations, and so it is sad to see it go.

As to why? This seems aligned with American Isolationism as a trend / ne policy thrust, and is in keeping with the foundational aspects of Project 2025.

I reckon NORAD will be next.

When I count the years, it seems a little "mists of time" but about this time of the year 36 years ago I was in DC on the "Washington School Tour*". The briefing meeting at State for the Canadian officers (there were three of us - a LCol, a Maj and a Capt) was with the desk officer (and member) for the PJB. He was a pleasant enough gentleman, but seemed very eager for us to take him seriously. It was obvious that no one who mattered in the State Department paid much attention to his, or the board's, activities. One indication of that was having to host/brief us in the cafeteria.



* the Washington School Tour was the US Army hosting all International Military Students who were attending advanced officer courses at US Army schools. Most of the activities during the five days were social/touristy, but there were briefings/discussions at the Pentagon and State Department done by desk officers responsible for the respective countries/regions/alliances of the students.
 
Last edited:
I presume behind the scenes there a clearer picture of intent.
Are we not buying lots of American gear? HIMARS etc
cant be over a few Globaleyes vs E7s
 
OR does the USA really start turning up the heat on us economically? I mean really shove us into the brazen bull statue with the fire on high?
 
OR does the USA really start turning up the heat on us economically? I mean really shove us into the brazen bull statue with the fire on high?

Anyone who believes for a second that things like this and more extreme to come no doubt, weren’t going to happen, were/are deluding themselves.

It seems the question includes consideration as to whether we apologize and bend a knee, or see what we can rightfully pursue in our own best interests on the balance of effects.
 
Anyone who believes for a second that things like this and more extreme to come no doubt, weren’t going to happen, were/are deluding themselves.

It seems the question includes consideration as to whether we apologize and bend a knee, or see what we can rightfully pursue in our own best interests on the balance of effects.
Iran seems to have a solution that doesn't require bending a knee. Perhaps we should take lessons in intestinal fortitude
 
Back
Top