
NORAD goes...
Then they start complaining about the "unprotected northern approaches" that Canada is doing nothing about...
Then... well I'll leave my tin foil hat off for now.
Would pausing this advisory group play into US hands somehow? I don't see how it could beyond a soundbite for their (and our) 51st state crowd.
I’ll contend the current administration is minimally concerned with any of those three. It does what it wants.Makes it easier for the U.S. to claim jus ad bellum in order to take action as it sees fit to secure Canadian territory in the name of U.S. defense and security.
Jus in bello and jus post bellum are minor details that may or may not be worried about by the current administration.
It is a new factor to take into account if one is so inclined to better inform one's understanding of our most important binational relationship.I don't get it.
Are we supposed to be upset?
I was an attendee at / member of that Board a few times in my career. It was a unique construct that had a tendency to be periodically ignored / undervalued by both sides, and was often performative. Nonetheless, these kinds of linkages can go a long way to lubricating the gears of binational relations, and so it is sad to see it go.
As to why? This seems aligned with American Isolationism as a trend / ne policy thrust, and is in keeping with the foundational aspects of Project 2025.
I reckon NORAD will be next.
Gurney Halleck is my favourite Star Fleet captain."Upset" is an emotion or mood. As Gurney Halleck once said: "What has mood to do with it? You fight when the necessity arises—no matter the mood! Mood’s a thing for cattle or making love or playing the baliset."
I reckon NORAD will be next.
You mean like violating even more legally binding trade agreements with us?OR does the USA really start turning up the heat on us economically? I mean really shove us into the brazen bull statue with the fire on high?
OR does the USA really start turning up the heat on us economically? I mean really shove us into the brazen bull statue with the fire on high?
Iran seems to have a solution that doesn't require bending a knee. Perhaps we should take lessons in intestinal fortitudeAnyone who believes for a second that things like this and more extreme to come no doubt, weren’t going to happen, were/are deluding themselves.
It seems the question includes consideration as to whether we apologize and bend a knee, or see what we can rightfully pursue in our own best interests on the balance of effects.
America will continue to punish us for wanting to be dependent on them, while also punishing us for moving to become dependent on them. Its a self licking ice cream coneYou mean like violating even more legally binding trade agreements with us?
America will continue to punish us for wanting to be dependent on them, while also punishing us for moving to become dependent on them. Its a self licking ice cream cone
Edit:
Its nice seeing politicans from both sides of the house denouncing this move. With Erin O'Toole and Jason Kenny coming out swinging against this.
Nothing from the PM or DM either but I imagine they are on the phone trying to get an explanationNothing from Poilievre yet, but even I think politicians are allowed to take Victoria Day off. We'll see if he says something tomorrow.
These guys are doing ALOT of heavy lifting on getting things up and running in Canada.Does this count as a win?
![]()
Agnico Eagle investing $14 billion in Northern Ontario mines
Ontario touts its fast permitting regime as a calling card to attract mining investmentwww.sudbury.com
Agnico Eagle investing $14 billion in Northern Ontario mines
And how would that option work here?Iran seems to have a solution that doesn't require bending a knee. Perhaps we should take lessons in intestinal fortitude
Some in media are attributing it to PMMC's speech at Davos. Sam Cooper at TheBureau for one.I wonder what the actual message is on this one? What precisely is this in response to?