
Part of the challenge is that the Gulf States are used to having someone else do the lifting. If the Houthi try closing the Straits again, it's possible that Egypt might decide to help out this time, they do have two amphibious landing ships for such a purpose and not their first Yemen adventure. Cutting the Houthi's off from the coast, will cause them no end of trouble and international orgs have stopped sending aid in, which has been a big source of cash for them. KSA and UAE have to stop effing around in Yemen and start backing the same players, or at least have their proxies play nice with each other.Oh fully agree.
My point is that no one is safe.
America and Israel have a modest cushion above others before things grind to a stop.
They can be flooded with seawater - I have zero idea on what that does long term though.
Everyone is.
At the end of the day the current situation isn’t sustainable.
It isn’t fascination.
Regardless of calling it Americas war or not as you have mentioned it is a global issue.
At a point the west will act out of necessity.
History has shown that outlook to be wrong time and time again.
Where did I say anything about Trumps crusade.
Iran is very well aware that there is a fine line of how it can push the West and the Gulf States before it becomes worthwhile to act with a very heavy hand.
And, pulling on that string even more, could there be famine in one or more parts of the world? Could there be a new Civil War because of this, which leads to potential millions of new refugees/illegal mirgtants on the march?You’d be gloriously happy your house burned down if you could blame it on President Trump wouldn’t you.
Maybe remember if a drunken skipper is at the helm, the crew sitting back giving peanut gallery comments at it hits a shoal doesn’t make you less culpable.
You seems to misunderstand that in a global oil crisis everyone is screwed.
No one seems to give a sh*t about the current civil war and famine in Sudan, now if Egypt goes down the toilet, people are going to worry big time.And, pulling on that string even more, could there be famine in one or more parts of the world? Could there be a new Civil War because of this, which leads to potential millions of new refugees/illegal mirgtants on the march?
The possible cascading affects are endless.
What about Saudi? UAE? Qatar?No one seems to give a sh*t about the current civil war and famine in Sudan, now if Egypt goes down the toilet, people are going to worry big time.
Is Trump even pretending that there is a least an objective anymore?
Ok, but did commercial shipping return to normal through BaM as a result of coalition military action that collectively defeated the Houthis? I donmt believe it did. Further, has the continued rapid development of strike drones made the job of threatening shipping through that Strait easier? I suspect it has.Just a reminder for those who are too deep in their politics to see things objectively, the last time the Houthi shut the BAM the world got together to deal with it.
There is zero reason to believe the world will be any happier/tolerant with the Houthi this time. The BAM makes it about far more than energy and fertilizer, and will hit China just as hard or harder than the West.
China can have all the coal they want, but if the world can't get their goods, they aren't making money.
You're right... it's hopeless, that part of the world is out of bounds forever. Abandon all hope. I'll start collecting leather clothing bits in preparation for our Mad Max future.Ok, but did commercial shipping return to normal through BaM as a result of coalition military action that collectively defeated the Houthis? I donmt believe it did. Further, has the continued rapid development of strike drones made the job of threatening shipping through that Strait easier? I suspect it has.
I think the Houthis are capable of being enough of a threat that the same issue of commercial insurance denying coverage can become an effective halt on much merchant shipping.
The world will act.You're right... it's hopeless, that part of the world is out of bounds forever. Abandon all hope. I'll start collecting leather clothing bits in preparation for our Mad Max future.
Either the impact will be far less than some of you are predicting, or the world will act. You can't have it both ways.
If the global economy grinds to a halt, the world will be at war.The world will act.
Rich nations will suck up all the available oil, poor nations will get shut out,fuel and fertilizer prices will skyrocket, the global economy grinds to a halt, and the poorest and most vulnerable die in droves. Because the poorest nations with the least access to oil are, in fact, poor, they don't have militaries exactly capable of taking on Iran.
The west can tolerate a lot of economic pain, look at covid lockdowns. Unfortunately for the west, tolerating economic pain usually fuels extremist parties so we have that to look forward to as well.
The global economy grinding to a halt will make the west commit to a land war of regime change in Iran?If the global economy grinds to a halt, the world will be at war.
Like I said, either the impact won't be as bad as some are predicting, or the world will act.
There is no scenario where the global economy grinds to a halt without response, because a few religious wack-jobs with weapons were too much for the rest of the world to handle.
The West is still comfortable for now, so it doesn't feel a need to act. When it gets uncomfortable enough, some dudes are going to have a chance to meet their maker. Human nature hasn't changed, our access to resources has... take away access, and many of those evil colonizers from Europe and Asia will rediscover their love of conflict/conquest.
You are not talking about the same thing I am. The West/World doing something, doesn't mean a protracted land war in Iran.The global economy grinding to a halt will make the west commit to a land war of regime change in Iran?
How about this?
America isn't wanting to fight a land war in Iran, and most nations would revolt if their leaders joined Trump in his war.
So name me who is going to get up, spool up their militaries, get a coalition going, and try to take enough land in Iran to prevent the IRGC from closing the SOH?
Canada?
Germany?
France?
Spain?
Italy?
Poland?
The UK?
Who, in the world, do you believe in your heart of hearts, is going to WAR to do what Trump wont do?
You can make the same points without stomping your feet. It doesn’t make any of what you’re saying stronger or more well founded.You're right... it's hopeless, that part of the world is out of bounds forever. Abandon all hope. I'll start collecting leather clothing bits in preparation for our Mad Max future.
Either the impact will be far less than some of you are predicting, or the world will act. You can't have it both ways.
Okay, good to get some clarification.You are not talking about the same thing I am. The West/World doing something, doesn't mean a protracted land war in Iran.
The USA is doing the striking to no great effect. As for talking, they have talked back and forth repeatedly, who is going to get Iran OR the USA, OR Isreal to listen?Doing something is escorting ships through, and striking targets until Iran and the Houthi learn that more can be gained by talking than shooting.
Of course governments will fall. But they would fall regardless of whether they join any effort to open the SOH.Also, in your fantasy land where the global economy halts with no response from the world, what makes you think governments wouldn't fall regardless of a land war in Iran? Why would anyone trust a government that let its national economy fail, regardless of the initiating cause?
I'm predicting the 3rd world starves and the rich world suffers from astronomical oil prices because Trump decided that he could "make a deal"You're predicting a world where people are starving and poor, but don't act because "Trump bad"?