• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

2026 Wildfire Season

So it appears that in BC we have had between 30 and 50 new starts in the past 2 days.
 
MSM take on U.S. legislator "WTF's with your smoke, Canada?!?!?" positions.

Also, for the record, I suspect many already have decent sites bookmarked, but if you like map-y stuff on this, here's some decent sites.
 
Last edited:
MSM take on U.S. legislator "WTF's with your smoke, Canada?!?!?" positions.

Also, for the record, I suspect many already have decent sites bookmarked, but if you like map-y stuff on this, here's some decent sites.
Might like this one too...

Still need to the other sites to see more specifics for each area
 
So it appears that in BC we have had between 30 and 50 new starts in the past 2 days.
That's not bad for the amount of lightning we've had here in Alberta. Assuming the same frontal passages came through.

It's when you're hitting those numbers for a district or region things get more active. I'd just call that busy Initial Attack day...

But then you get a fire inside/beside a community and things get very real very fast.
 
Beaverton seldom disappoints :)
 
I'd make them a deal. We will look into our smoke rights after they solve guns and drugs crossing the border northbound.
There's no problems with smuggled guns at the border, says Nathalie. And, the Big Cheeto is sure all the drugs are flowing southbound.

Since the current US administration has thumbed it's nose at global warming, maybe they should stop sending supercell thunderstorms and heat waves north to Canada to start the fires.
 
Yup ...
1784321426593.png
This from a year ago ....
I wondering when TRump will start charging a Tariff on those affected states or insist that USA must increase its manufacturing of smoke and export more of it.
Way to jinx it ;)
 

Literally...

Grampa Simpson Grandpa GIF by MOODMAN
 
That's not bad for the amount of lightning we've had here in Alberta. Assuming the same frontal passages came through.

It's when you're hitting those numbers for a district or region things get more active. I'd just call that busy Initial Attack day...

But then you get a fire inside/beside a community and things get very real very fast.
Correct…

I just happened to be up on SilverStar mountain this morning. Two of the recent lightning starts are now being flamed by intense winds. They appear to be in the Sugar Lake area of the Monashee mountains, about 60kms east of Vernon. Quite close to the infamous Ostrich farm, actually. Wind is blowing 40-50 kmh and the mountain air temp is 36C.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_8347.jpeg
    IMG_8347.jpeg
    1.4 MB · Views: 3
this is probably the only time we’ll see CBC gloating, tut-tutting, chirping and clapping about how great wildfire smoke is.
 
It also depends on the airframes...

Large fixed wing units like the L-188 are excellent especially in mountains where they're able to handle the wind/lift changes better than smaller units....but dropping water is hell on planes especially the wing spars and under go high strain on the airframes. Smaller units like the Air Tractors 802's are great (in numbers to match equal load of a large plane) and can be very precise...but they are small light planes in a area with all kinds of wind/heat/lift implications. The DeHavaliand series of scooper water bombers I'd place in the middle.
be
Note that the 802s and the CL-215/415/future 515 series tend to be built on new...many are just wearing out or have had complete rebuilds.

Planes like the Dash 8 Q400 tend to be civilian used planes converted...same with the RJ-185/Bae146's. Partially because in some cases the airframe is not in production anymore but there are ample #'s built for sourcing parts etc.

Personally...if we want a federal fleet outside of what the CIFFC tender process created this year....and CIFFC has already tapped out that fleet...then I'd be looking at one of three options:
  • Bombardier Dash8- Q400 MR. This is a sub-series but allows for both passenger use or tanker use via modular tank systems. Saskatchewan has 2 of them and I view them as both a civil response/water bomber. this is my first choice due to the number of civilian airframes out there and pilots available.
  • C-130 with modular MAFF tank. This would be similar to the US Air National Guard squadrons who fly these missions. Aligns better with the RCAF but it's a US airframe which is politically tougher
  • CL-515 but only if they were also given additional taskings like SAR on the Great Lakes/coastline. You need a mission when seasons are slow and if it's going to be a federal fleet then aligning multiple priorities is key. Almost every province/territory uses the older versions of these planes so they are fairly inter-operable with provincial fleets.
The problem with converted or re-purposed aircraft (or, alternatively, the advantage of the CL-x15 and Air Tractor) in the Ontario context and likely some other provinces, is they require airfields; whereas northern Ontario has lots and lots of lakes to scoop water directly from.

Dual/multiple use would great, but I don't think the Ontario MNR thinks in those terms. They used to have a fairly sizeable fleet of Otters, Beavers and Turbo Beavers with 'bombing' pontoons that had other uses, but I think they are down to a very small handful. Getting the MNR into SAR would be a new role, and off the top of my head, the only winter use for their aircraft is game surveys. I'm not sure how suitable the CL is for winter operations.
 
Back
Top