• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Canada moves to 2% GDP end of FY25/26 - PMMC

Matt Winkler, Bloomberg’s Editor-in-Chief’s take on Canada’s economic performance relative to other nations:


Edit to add alternate link:

I could show more but I think we all get the picture about Matt Winkler and the LPC…

IMG_0525.png
 
We need to start producing something like this at the federal level. 40mm carrier. Anyone who can commercialize this will stand beside Maxim, Colt, and Garand as a weapons designer.

High-Strain-Rate Kinetic Fouling Matrix

40mm-deployable, Counter-UAS (C-UAS) payload utilizing a Non-Newtonian Shear-Thickening Fluid (STF) nanocomposite. Formulation must remain a low-viscosity fluid during ballistic transit and spatial dispersal, yet undergo an instantaneous, reversible phase transition into a high-tensile, macroscopic entangling solid upon high-velocity mechanical impact with drone rotors.

1. Rheological Design & Nanocomposite Architecture
To maximize the critical shear rate differential between aerodynamic dispersal xxx and rotor impact xxx, a highly concentrated colloid must be engineered near its maximum packing fraction.
  • Continuous Dispersant Phase: Low-molecular-weight Polyethylene Glycol. The ether oxygen backbone provides excellent chemical stability, wide operational temperature windows and optimal Newtonian baselines to prevent premature thickening during low-shear gas deployment.
  • Dispersed Nanoparticle Phase: Monodisperse, hydrophilic fumed silica (xxx nominal diameter) or surface-functionalized poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) spheres. Spherical morphologies are critical to ensure predictable, isotropic hydrocluster formation.
  • High-Tensile Interlocking Fillers: Surface-modified Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes (SWCNTs) or aramid pulps functionalized with silane coupling agents.

2. Microstructural Thickening Mechanism
At rest and during sub-critical flight dispersal, steric or electrostatic repulsive forces dominate, allowing the nanoparticles to flow smoothly around one another.

Upon propeller blade contact, the applied hydrodynamic stress overcomes these repulsive barriers. The particles are driven out of their equilibrium positions into localized, tightly packed aggregates.

The nano-filament strands become mechanically entrapped and squeezed within hydroclusters. This induces a catastrophic, mass-dilatant spike in viscosity. The continuous spinning motion of the rotor acts as a mechanical spool, pulling the localized high-viscosity mass into macroscopic, fibrillar ropes.

This transfers rotational kinetic energy into tensile strain, wrapping and binding the motor shaft to cause an instantaneous mechanical stall.

3. Critical Thermodynamic and Physical Constraints
  • Solvation & Particle Volume Fraction: The operational window must sit precisely between xxx and xxx. Exceeding this threshold risks premature jamming inside the 40mm canister during launch acceleration. Falling below it prevents the formation of continuous hydroclusters, causing the material to merely splash off the rotor.
  • Viscoelastic Relaxation Dynamics: The relaxation time of the fluid must be synthetically tuned via chemical crosslinking density to prevent immediate reversion to a liquid state once the propeller slows, ensuring permanent rotor immobilization.

Existing tech. Existing platforms. Existing supply chains.
 
So….a spiderman web slinger?
More like a structural mist. First round releases at 100m, second 75m, etc. As long as any part of it touches the propellers it turns the entire cloud into string it wraps around itself. Its a similar principle to chainsaw gloves/pants. It could be fired high and then settle on an area. This gets around the direct hit tracking problem for infantry.
 
I have a hope with the term "strategic partnership" as heralding a new vision for armoured vehicle production. This is to create a move away from transactional, feast or famine, projects to a directed joint system where DIA staff and CAF project and maintenance staff all partner with GDLS-C design and production staff to create solutions to future needs.

Exactly what it is. This is supposed to be closer to how shipbuilding is run. A pipeline of work. Cooperation with industry on what can be built. And what technologies need to be fostered. Add milpers posted to DIA and industry to advise and guide development. A lot of this is still ramping admittedly.

Would Denmark/Norway/Sweden/Finland ever have any interested in an expanded version of this to include their northern regions?

You're assuming it just covers our Arctic. Not quite. And we absolutely would share with them.
 
Lots of possibilities but in my view the "strategic partnership" is most decidedly not new.

Yes and no. We've probably not done something this tight with industry in easily half a decade. This means there's nobody in government who still remembers how to do this. It's honestly been useful that DIA's CEO is a banker in this regard. It's a job that needed an outsider.

It's amazing what a seperation crisis can stir-up...

That's not what got them this. As Noah points out, it's the backing of several large IT companies. And I'm sure they appreciate AB ramming though some data centres. Or more accurately an order of magnitude spend higher than any other province, on data centres. That is the part that is controversial given how much some constituencies hate data centres.
 
The Liberal Party - and only the Liberal Party - doesn't have a mechanism for that.
Are you saying that the Liberal Party MP don’t have the ability to vote with the Opposition and bring down the government?
 
Are you saying that the Liberal Party MP don’t have the ability to vote with the Opposition and bring down the government?
That's very different from what you were saying earlier.

Their constitution doesn't allow them to remove the party leader outside of an election loss. A leader can only voluntarily resign.
 
Liberal MPs have that ability.

They have never shown that level of independence.
When was the last time a political party at any level of government did this in Canada? As in vote against their own government to take it down.

When we went to American style leadership contests and leaders getting to pick candidates, party caucuses lost the ability turf their leaders implicitly. It's sad, I wish our MPs had the ability to rebel, like in the UK. I would love to go back to our Westminster roots.
 
That's very different from what you were saying earlier.

Their constitution doesn't allow them to remove the party leader outside of an election loss. A leader can only voluntarily resign.

That's very different from what you were saying earlier.

Their constitution doesn't allow them to remove the party leader outside of an election loss. A leader can only voluntarily resign.
True. I stand corrected.
 
I asked Gemini. Apparently, sitting members have only taken down their own government once in Canadian history. NDP MLA Jim Walding took down the Manitoba NDP government by one vote against the budget in 1988. This is apparently the only time in Canadian history.
 
Back
Top