• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Trump administration 2024-2028

Concealing beneficial ownership is not a prerequisite to limiting liability. It is however a handy tool when you want to take legally questionable financial actions.

Delaware must be delighted.
Tell me how a named company incorporated in - let's say Ontario - is any different from a numbered company when it comes to concealing beneficial ownership? Registration of company officers is part of the accessible corporate record, but you won't see the shareholding ownership until you have access to the company's own books which aren't available to everyone. The law basically states:

As of January 1, 2023, privately-held corporations in Ontario are required to keep their beneficial ownership information, or “individuals with significant control” information, on file and to provide that information when requested by law enforcement, and regulatory and tax authorities.

That's the same for any private company registered in ON, whether numbered or named.

These laws are generally harmonized across Canadian jurisdictions. We don't control Delaware any more than we control Switzerland.

🍻
 
Under threat or potential threat, one zigs and zags.
POTUS will go one way, and VP, SecState etc will go others.
They should not be travelling together anyway.

If folks want to be mad at anybody for worrying more about the security of the President, it's the USSS. In motorcades, there is an entire set of procedures, alternates, etc. for 'the package' (limo, security cars, etc.), not the rest of the crowd. There might be other people involved who have their own protected status, but they will not be as high as the President's. People who regularly travel or work with the President, or any other high security Internationally Protected Person, either knows this or should know it. Nobody should be cannon fodder, but anyone who thinks they have the same security value as their principal is mistaken.
 
Tell me how a named company incorporated in - let's say Ontario - is any different from a numbered company when it comes to concealing beneficial ownership? Registration of company officers is part of the accessible corporate record, but you won't see the shareholding ownership until you have access to the company's own books which aren't available to everyone. The law basically states:



That's the same for any private company registered in ON, whether numbered or named.

These laws are generally harmonized across Canadian jurisdictions. We don't control Delaware any more than we control Switzerland.

🍻

The instance being discussed is American backsliding on the requirement to have beneficial ownership information provided to the US Government.
 
To the moon baby



A $25 billion 30-year Treasury auction this week ended with yields at 5.216% – the highest since 2001. The auction is the latest sign of investors’ concern over Treasuries and demand for higher compensation to finance our growing national debt.

Despite the record high yield, the 30-year auction saw weaker demand than last month, with a bid-to-cover ratio of 2.39 and primary dealers absorbing 11.5% of the issuance – both pointing to weaker demand than their averages over the past 12 months. The awarded yield was reported as above the prevailing “when-issued” yield, indicating demand was weaker than expected.

Yields on the 30-year Treasury bond surpassed a 19-year record last month and are currently trending above 5.2%. Meanwhile, yields on the 10-year Treasury note have been above 4.6% for nearly the past month, or over 40 basis points above projections from the Congressional Budget Office.
I don't know what is driving this up, coordinated sell job, weaker demand as people sour on the US treasuries, or if AI is sucking up all the capital in the room, but either way, the chickens are starting to come home to roost.

5+ percent yields, for the global reserve currency? with the massive deficits the USA is running, with the massive federal debt?

The USA may have just entered debt spiral territory
 
Under threat or potential threat, one zigs and zags.
POTUS will go one way, and VP, SecState etc will go others.

I read that Natalie was originally to be left on the decoy plane.

"Donald Trump's 'nappy nurse' had 'meltdown' after being put on different plane to POTUS"

Not sure if that was a Secret Service decision.

She was put on the proxy plane and had just went crazy and got everyone involved with this, and, in fact, then was moved on to the Trump plane because then Trump found out.
 
I read that Natalie was originally to be left on the decoy plane.

"Donald Trump's 'nappy nurse' had 'meltdown' after being put on different plane to POTUS"

Not sure if that was a Secret Service decision.
Some people are not cool being left to potentially die it seems.

And then there are the resignations coming right after...
 
Some people are not cool being left to potentially die it seems.

And then there are the resignations coming right after...
Those resignations are much likely to be a result of latest jobs, growth, and popularity numbers. People are just as likely to be bailing to avoid the mid-term shitshow, and havng to serve a complete lame duck for two more years. Another contributing factor could be that they actually know how bad his mental and physical state is....
 
Those resignations are much likely to be a result of latest jobs, growth, and popularity numbers. People are just as likely to be bailing to avoid the mid-term shitshow, and havng to serve a complete lame duck for two more years. Another contributing factor could be that they actually know how bad his mental and physical state is....
…or…you know, once the leave and become ‘outside advisors’ they can be shielded from future Congressional and Justice investigations by Executive Privilege.

 
Welcome to the new tyranny...

I've got faith in the power to the States to resist some of the craziness imposed by the Feds though...

Historian Timothy Snyder Says the U.S. Is Undergoing an “Authoritarian Regime Change”​

Snyder weighs in on Trump, the midterms, and why he believes the country can’t simply go back to normal.

Historian Timothy Snyder has spent much of his career studying how democracies unravel. And right now, he believes the U.S. is living through a pivotal moment.

“For me, it’s pretty clear that what has happened in the United States or what is happening is an authoritarian regime change,” Snyder told Katie Couric in the latest episode of her podcast, Next Question. "We have people in power who are doing things which are unprecedented on a national scale."

Snyder later pointed to aggressive gerrymandering, the erosion of voting rights, and the potential for voter intimidation in November as signs of that broader shift. He argued that what distinguishes the current moment from previous periods of authoritarianism in American history is its national scope and its focus on political opposition.

That’s why Snyder, the author of On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century, believes Americans need to think beyond any single election, even as November approaches.

“I see it as a turning point for the history of the United States,” he says, arguing that Americans need to recognize that “the stakes of the election are the republic itself.”

Does America recognize what’s happening?​

For Snyder, the concern isn’t simply what’s happening to American democracy, but whether Americans recognize the shift — and what they make of it.

Snyder’s answer is more complicated than simply saying voters aren’t paying attention. He argues that some Americans may recognize the country’s authoritarian drift and welcome it.

“A lot of Americans don’t want democracy, and a lot of Americans don’t like freedom,” Snyder says. “A lot of Americans would like to be told what to do.”

But Snyder sees another, much larger group as potentially persuadable: Americans who believe the political and economic systems are fundamentally unfair but don’t necessarily see strengthening democracy as the solution.

“It’s not that people don’t know something is wrong. They do,” he says. The challenge, he argues, is connecting that dissatisfaction to the idea that the country needs “a more just and a more democratic society.”


 
Back
Top