KevinB Army.ca Relic Subscriber Reaction score 30,922 Points 1,260 47 minutes ago #10,121 mariomike said: How did Dan, Walt and Natalie score priority over these individuals? Click to expand... Under threat or potential threat, one zigs and zags. POTUS will go one way, and VP, SecState etc will go others.
mariomike said: How did Dan, Walt and Natalie score priority over these individuals? Click to expand... Under threat or potential threat, one zigs and zags. POTUS will go one way, and VP, SecState etc will go others.
mariomike Moderator Staff member Directing Staff Subscriber Mentor Reaction score 2,468 Points 1,260 40 minutes ago #10,122 KevinB said: Under threat or potential threat, one zigs and zags. POTUS will go one way, and VP, SecState etc will go others. Click to expand... Thank-you. I knew there had to be a logical explanation from a Security POV.
KevinB said: Under threat or potential threat, one zigs and zags. POTUS will go one way, and VP, SecState etc will go others. Click to expand... Thank-you. I knew there had to be a logical explanation from a Security POV.