
And I got dumped on earlier for calling out all the worst case scenarios on this and how the US didn’t plan for any of them.
The enemy of my enemy is my friend and all but... Maybe I'll just "let them fight" lol
You know, like a treat.
![]()
Trump says US may strike Iran’s Kharg Island oil export hub ‘just for fun’
In comments to NBC News, US presidents also deflates hope of deal with Tehran, saying ‘terms aren’t good enough’www.theguardian.com
And they are a maritime nation, at that...Fully agree but to not have a single vessel ready to sail? Someone should be laying their head on a block for that one up to and including the minister.
And who should be held responsible?And they are a maritime nation, at that...
A maritime nation that doesn't have a single operational attack submarine available & only a single missile sub out as there as their strategic deterrent, and no surface ships available to sail either.
A few years ago they were also a maritime nation that didn't have a maritime patrol aircraft. (Allied planes & crews provided their maritime patrol capability for a while, including Canada)
They made a point of sailing their shiny new carrier all over Asia recently, as part of a task group demonstrating that "Britain is back!"
And yet...here they are.
...
I realize that Israel & the US didn't include the UK in their planning, but there's enough going on in tne world at the moment to bring the RN's readiness level higher than 2 available River class...
100%A week ago there were the usual suspects on here saying that we were being biased and not giving these guys the benefit of doubt.
To me, if you're going to plan a war with Iran and don't plan for a fight to control the Strait, and don't plan to protect major commercial centres (like Doha and Dubai) and critical assets in the region, it's rank incompetence, and I don't think they deserve the benefit of doubt. And if they did plan? Why were the assets they needed not in place?
And what$150 oil. Totally a treat.
Oil last peaked in July 2008 at $147/bbl. Adjusted for inflation that is $222 today. So we have a ways to go before creating another generational crisis that will take a decade to recover from.
And before that, oil peaked at $11.65 in January 1974 during the '73 oil crisis. Adjusted for inflation that is $76.89. So we're well past that level.
And what happened in September of 2008?$150 oil. Totally a treat.
Oil last peaked in July 2008 at $147/bbl. Adjusted for inflation that is $222 today. So we have a ways to go before creating another generational crisis that will take a decade to recover from.
And before that, oil peaked at $11.65 in January 1974 during the '73 oil crisis. Adjusted for inflation that is $76.89. So we're well past that level.
If they lose HMS Richmond and HMS Kent this year as rumoured they will be down to 5 Type 23sFully agree but to not have a single vessel ready to sail? Someone should be laying their head on a block for that one up to and including the minister.
The way things are going, it seems like Iran will get nukes, the question is whether it's their own, or nukes from the US or Israel.
Granted it's The Guardian, but it appears the locals are not in the mood to revolt with ordinance falling on them and the infrastructure they will need to rebuild.
![]()
‘You are all worse than each other’: anti-regime Iranians turn on Trump
Mood among some in Iran shifts from hope of being rescued to dismay at destruction of infrastructure, culture and liveswww.theguardian.com
A week ago there were the usual suspects on here saying that we were being biased and not giving these guys the benefit of doubt.
To me, if you're going to plan a war with Iran and don't plan for a fight to control the Strait, and don't plan to protect major commercial centres (like Doha and Dubai) and critical assets in the region, it's rank incompetence, and I don't think they deserve the benefit of doubt. And if they did plan? Why were the assets they needed not in place?