Search results

From what I was told, the original article headline said "guns" and was later changed to "weapons".

And, if that someone is a Canadian citizen, then what? Hand them over to India because they hurt Modi's feelings? Political, legal, moral and ethical minefield.

Well, the Toronto (Red) Star's headline read: "Our weapons are not for sale", playing nicely into the LPC narrative that legal gun owners and their sporting equipment are dangerous.

Thanks. I'll delete my account now.

Can't wait for the LPC press release about a small number of fringe activist protesting against the gun grab and showing complete disdain for the government's attempts to ensure public safety in Québec City today.

So, if Ukraine helps the US against Iran, what are the chances that the US will continue to help Ukraine against Russia?

The RCMP have a national contest to let kids name new police service dogs. Why can't the Pentagon do the same for new wars?

This, plus my understanding from a briefing a couple of years ago was that any firearm permanently exported from the US cannot be re-imported back to the US. Their rules. There are always exceptions, of course. Maybe @KevinB can weigh in.

Where nobody wins except the Liberals.

Your now prohibited firearms cannot be sold or exported except under very narrow conditions. They have no monetary value and that's what they will pay for them, nothing. That was the plan all along, despite the government's messaging to the contrary.

Doubtful. America is obsessed with power and celebrity.

They are protected by the Secret Service until death. The USSS hasn't lost a former president to assaination - yet.

Except that that, itself, is illegal unless reported to a peace officer. (CCC s. 106)

Québec has a similar model with the unique exception of the Akwesasne Mohawk Police Service which serves the QC and ON portions of the community. Their HQ is on the QC side. The US side has their own St. Regis Mohawk Tribal Police.

Easy fix. Under IRPA 29(2) impose a condition that the person shall not be granted a PAL/RPAL. This can be done under IRPR 185(c) by stating they are not permitted to undertake the CFSC/CRFSC.

I did a few deployments north of 60 where all our kit was searched prior to departure for commercial and non-commercial alcohol.

The current MND is the former PS Minister and the co-architect of all this stupidity. The same lack of access to the portal would also likely impact other federal employees OUTCAN such as GAC, CBSA, DFAIT and snowbirds as well.

Which one would that be? 😈

Mail is an anonymous way to move contraband. When a suspect parcel is delivered, the receiver can simply say "I never ordered that" or "no idea who the sender is or what's inside". In some cases, controlled deliveries were done to ensure the right evidence was gathered at the right time from...

It won't and it can't. The LPC have invested too much in this already and it's key to retaining QC as their vital ground.