I'm no longer really paying attention to tactics or training but looks like the Police aren't trained in IARD and their TTPs appear to be radically different from what would be seen here, in the US or somewhere like the UK or Mainland Europe.
IARD instructor hat on.
So, to be fair, it’s tough to gauge their TTPs off what we see. Active shooter training tends to emphasize indoor tactics. Good outdoor stuff is less common. Also, we don’t know if any of the police on scene did immediately move to the threat but were engaged and suppressed or wounded. It may be that there was an immediate flawless two man IARD response- but that they both got shot quickly. Pistols versus long guns outdoors in the terrain we saw here is a losing proposition.
I’m going to speculate, but form working various events myself, I suspect there were police on scene, and that they were probably wandering and mingling, seeing and being scene. They were probably as shocked as anyone else when shooting started. They would also have been obvious targets.
Having been to Australia and NZ, this isn't particularly surprising. Rank & file Kiwi Police aren't even armed with firearms.
The police forces there in terms of Armed Response seem to be similar to what the UK was like 30 years ago. Rank and file British Police aren't armed either but their Armed Response Units are constantly patrolling and response is generally minutes away.
NSW state police (there’s no municipal police in Australia) are all armed with pistols. Glocks I believe. General patrol officers are now trained or equipped with patrol rifles. Compare that to even here in Canada where some police services have everyone on the road equipped with a C8 and a set of plates. Australians still in a “this doesn’t happen here” mentality. Except it does, whether terrorism, or SovCit notions out in the boonies.
In the videos I noticed some shirt and tie desk cops on scene in the early response. I surmise that they probably ran from the police station a few hundred meters away. Some weren’t even wearing vests or identifiable as police. IMO, speaking as a plainclothes guy myself, there’s a culture of complacency. I’m one of few in my office who actually carry my chunk, a mag, and some handcuffs all day even in the office. And my vests, Kevlar and ceramic, and both at my desk ready to go. I bet if we had a ‘bad day’ I’d be one of a tiny number in the building ready to go in less than several minutes. And it pisses me off. I bet it’s the same at police offices everywhere.
I expect some AARs and Inquiries will probably lead to some radical changes, similar to Moncton/Mayerthorpe.
I bet so.
Also, in one of the videos, you can clearly see a police truck drive right by the shooters while they were both on the bridge, probably trying to get their bearings.
Understandable. They probably have a rushed and unclear dispatch, and probably were sent to where bodies were dropping. They would have been tunnelled in on getting there safely without smoking anyone in the parking lot. Easy to drive past something when you’re hauling ass; we’ve all done it.
Maybe it’s time to take the kid gloves off.
Well, it doesn’t sound like they had indicators for this one. The father was a law abiding gun owner for a decade. Ultimately police shot them both and killed one, so I don’t see any relevant kid gloves here.
Sometimes shitty people act without tipping their hand. Not everyone is stupid enough to get flagged and caught first.