
It may actually be Vance.
![]()
Vance suggests Nidal Hasan’s execution won’t be livestreamed, contradicting Hegseth
The defense secretary had said on Thursday that the convicted Fort Hood shooter’s execution by firing squad would be livestreamed for the public.www.nbcnews.com
Twelve men from the 109th Regiment formed the firing squad with M1 Garand rifles. Eleven rifles held live rounds, one held a blank.
I wonder if the the US government has asked private industry to sponsor this…Readers wishing to tune in for live event may expect to see something like this.
Or, maybe not, as it will be the first U.S. military execution by firing squad since January 1945,
Or on second thought…Colt, Winchester…and Pabst Blue RibbonI wonder if the the US government has asked private industry to sponsor this…
Budweiser might go for it
This.I'm generally a bit leery about the death penalty, given how imperfect any system - including justice - can be.
In this case, 100% OK with the death penalty given that, 1) he betrayed his Hippocratic oath re: helping vs. hurting people (remember, he was an MD/psychiatrist), 2) he betrayed the oath/duty of protecting his colleagues, and 3) he swore allegiance to shitty folks wanting to do serious harm to the country he was supposed to help protect.
That said, making it an almost pay-per-view event is, to be polite, below the standard expected. He said he wanted to be a martyr, so he'll get that, but the U.S. actively helping him amplify that by providing state-produced video of the execution to the world doesn't exactly exude an air of solemn professionalism in doing a tough but necessary task.
Wielding state-sanctioned violence shouldn't be a spectator blood sport - unless ISIS, Afghanistan/the Taliban, North Korea or Iran are the standards aimed for.
I guess someone forgot that in Nuremberg, the hangings of even Nazi war criminals weren't even make public.This.
It should be a closed event with only appropriate quantity of family representatives, government legal and military’s witnesses of the event.
It is almost incomprehensible that the U.S. wouldn’t understand how the proposed execution methodology couldn’t help but martyrize Hasan and strengthen the call for Jihad against the U.S.
The backside of the fascist rise, not the frontside, some might posit.I guess someone forgot that in Nuremberg, the hangings of even Nazi war criminals weren't even make public.
It was a different time, I guess.
Conceptual indeed. Personnel downrange and the accused facing away.Readers wishing to tune in for live event may expect to see something like this.
Or, maybe not, as it will be the first U.S. military execution by firing squad since January 1945,
This administration is conducting a holy war and has some version of god on its side.This.
It should be a closed event with only appropriate quantity of family representatives, government legal and military’s witnesses of the event.
It is almost incomprehensible that the U.S. wouldn’t understand how the proposed execution methodology couldn’t help but martyrize Hasan and strengthen the call for Jihad against the U.S.
I wonder if the the US government has asked private industry to sponsor this…
Budweiser might go for it
"Just a tantrum with a machine gun."

Probably to hide all the Nazis we pardoned and brought to North America.I guess someone forgot that in Nuremberg, the hangings of even Nazi war criminals weren't even make public.
It was a different time, I guess.
They had a terrorism problem and there's a whole thing with swine and pigs and you know the story they don't like them ... and Gen. Pershing was a rough guy and he sits on his horse and he's very astute, like a ramrod. ... And he caught 50 terrorists that did tremendous damage and killed many people ... and he dipped 50 bullets in pig's blood," Trump explained.
"And he had his men load his rifles and he lined up the 50 people, and they shot 49 of those people," he continued. "And the 50th person he said, 'You go back to your people and you tell them what happened.' And for 25 years there wasn't a problem, OK? Twenty-five years there wasn't a problem!"
It is unclear why Trump's original claim of "25 years" without "a problem" increased to "35 years" in his tweet Thursday.
At a March 2016 rally, he escalated the number to 42 years.