I’m sure the sentiment is shared by many. But would any second amendment changes in the US have prevented this?Jaded due to decades of the USA doing everything possible to avoid doing anything regarding gun control.
This is a demonstration of how discourse cannot be had in a civilized way. Charlie Kirk is a polarizing figure but the answer to that isn’t shooting the guy for his beliefs.
The issue isn’t gun laws but rather what environment has been created that would lead anyone to do something like this and think that this is the solution to debate in what is supposed to be the country that espouses things like free speech and democracy.