- Reaction score
- 12,123
- Points
- 1,040
Because doxxing and harassment and violence against people identified on social media, sometimes with a side of inflammatory rhetoric, is indisputable, and because the level of anger against immigration enforcement is well above customary limits for anti-police sentiment. The people making the identifications can claim that they are just recording and reporting (as they have the right to do) and that anyone who acts on that information is responsible for the results (also correct). People separately publishing opinions or making speeches that people should "resist" can likewise claim innocence. ("I didn't record anything or suggest people interfere, I just suggested people ought to resist. Oh, I suppose I did refer to ICE as illegitimate jack-booted fascist thugs, but that is protected expression; I didn't advocate that anyone engage in violence.")I hate ICE et al wearing masks well performing public duties. If your not breaking the law why feel the need to hide your face? Just another way they are removing accountability from the government.
And then there are the flakes who put identification and rhetoric together and act on it.
The agents should not be masked. But I would propose that before that happens, people keep their recordings private or at least not openly indulge in efforts to identify people in video until there is some need for legitimate legal review, and that opinion leaders (and especially politicians) eschew all inflammatory rhetoric and instead urge co-operation with lawful authority.




