• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

A Deeply Fractured US

... The illegal immigration problem was easy to create; it essentially requires no effort except to stand down from enforcement. It is much harder to reverse (enforce). Political reality intrudes: the administration has at most four years, and maybe only two depending on how midterms go. So they're in a bit of a hurry, and one way of speeding things up is to surge. Admission standards loosen up; training time shortens; and add in whatever else they've done to cut corners ...
All true enough, for sure. Still, as others have said in these parts, legal =/= right.
... People who oppose immigration enforcement and not just immigration enforcement done poorly are also in the wrong.
Fair enough as well.

As for the Democrats dropping the ball, also fair, but also as others smarter than me here have said in similar situations, it's up to the current management to fix things, and there seems to be a bit of what some consider pendulum overswing in the implemtation.
 
As for the Democrats dropping the ball, also fair, but also as others smarter than me here have said in similar situations, it's up to the current management to fix things, and there seems to be a bit of what some consider pendulum overswing in the implemtation.
How many man-hours of officialdom's time is consumed by one person entering the country illegally?

How many man-hours are (by customary processes) consumed to remove one person who entered the country illegally?

The administration is trying to undo four years' worth of the former (leaving aside the prior decades) in its own four years. If the time/efforts are unequal - and they are - some kinds of multipliers are needed. Then apply the multipliers necessary to overcome passive and active resistance. I do not expect them to come remotely close to removing all the illegals who entered during the Biden administration and since, and I doubt they expect to, either. Focus seems to be on identifying and removing those with criminal histories and associations, starting with the worst (violent criminals). Haste making waste, innocents are caught up. What practical alternatives exist that will remove at least several hundred thousand people? Are any being offered up by opponents of status quo willing to cooperate in order to achieve the aims?

The people in charge right now are very angry at how their predecessors behaved. I can guess that they do not much care about criticism, particularly from anyone associated with their predecessors. They are doing what administrations do: seeking/creating a favourable legal theory and applying it until successfully challenged; if stymied by the courts or Congress, they find another.
 
An over-reaction is still a reaction.

Here is an article by "Liberal Patriot" contributor Ruy Teixeira, quoting at length another Substacker (Noah Smith - "Noahpinion") here. They identify what they see as an unwillingness among Democrats to confront their own responsibility for sowing seeds. When I write that Democrats have created problems that the administration is trying to fix, I am not pulling that opinion out of my own fundament.

The illegal immigration problem was easy to create; it essentially requires no effort except to stand down from enforcement. It is much harder to reverse (enforce). Political reality intrudes: the administration has at most four years, and maybe only two depending on how midterms go. So they're in a bit of a hurry, and one way of speeding things up is to surge. Admission standards loosen up; training time shortens; and add in whatever else they've done to cut corners. This is, as usual, observation and implies no endorsement. People who oppose immigration enforcement and not just immigration enforcement done poorly are also in the wrong.
It is easy enough to reverse as well. As I said, one law, employing illegal immigrants results in jail time.

Suddenly there is no work and they leave on their own because they can’t survive without work.

The only reason this problem exists is American greed and a love of cheap illegal labour because there is no consequences for the exploiter. Take away the incentive and suddenly the problem goes away.

But we can’t do that, American citizens can do no wrong and instead we need the Gustapo going door to door dragging citizens from their homes and denying proper due process.
 
It is easy enough to reverse as well. As I said, one law, employing illegal immigrants results in jail time.

Suddenly there is no work and they leave on their own because they can’t survive without work.

The only reason this problem exists is American greed and a love of cheap illegal labour because there is no consequences for the exploiter. Take away the incentive and suddenly the problem goes away.

But we can’t do that, American citizens can do no wrong and instead we need the Gustapo going door to door dragging citizens from their homes and denying proper due process.
I’ve been saw all along, arrest those the employ illegal immigrants. Throw them in jail and seize their company and the problem will be solved within a month.
 
I’ve been saw all along, arrest those the employ illegal immigrants. Throw them in jail and seize their company and the problem will be solved within a month.

That sounds super easy. And because it hasn't been done, I can guess it’s because they do not want to actually go after all illegals. They know it’s impossible. They have tightened up the border and they will expel as many really bad criminals as possible and call it a win. And that actually would be a win from status quo.
 
That sounds super easy. And because it hasn't been done, I can guess it’s because they do not want to actually go after all illegals. They know it’s impossible. They have tightened up the border and they will expel as many really bad criminals as possible and call it a win. And that actually would be a win from status quo.
The term "really bad criminal" is subjective, and is is often difficult to draw a straight line between the presence of criminals and arrests with publicly available information, but using ICE's own data for 2024, they don't don't seem to have embraced data driven law enforcement.

Arrest for 'criminal convictions' were about 38% of all arrests. Of that, about 6% were in the Chicago district which includes Minnesota. If they really wanted to go after "really bad criminals, they should be in their southern districts which account for almost half of their criminal arrests.

Maybe Minneapolis, Maine and six year olds aren't the droids they are looking for.

 
That sounds super easy. And because it hasn't been done, I can guess it’s because they do not want to actually go after all illegals.
Even though Trump himself has suggested jumping all over businesses employing undocumented/illegal immigrants, maaaaaaaybe they don't want to go after businesses? To be fair to the current administration, though (and I stand to be corrected), I can't remember any sweeping, broad-spectrum round-up of business owners employing undocumented/illegal immigrants under either Democrat or Republican administrations in recent memory - or at least not of the scale of rounding up individual workers.
 
Even though Trump himself has suggested jumping all over businesses employing undocumented/illegal immigrants, maaaaaaaybe they don't want to go after businesses? To be fair to the current administration, though (and I stand to be corrected), I can't remember any sweeping, broad-spectrum round-up of business owners employing undocumented/illegal immigrants under either Democrat or Republican administrations in recent memory - or at least not of the scale of rounding up individual workers.
From the guy who tore down the East Wing with a Swedish excavator… 😆
IMG_8243.jpeg
 
Looks like federal agents (probably ICE and/or CBP) just shot and probably killed another one in Minneapolis. This video is already making the rounds and regardless of the officer(s’?) articulation, this will explode.


Shooter (first shot) is the one in the grey hood. Not exactly sure how they're going to justify this.

EDIT: You can see him draw (left side of the group) @ 0:17, leans around the guy in front of him to fire off the first shot which then causes a few of the others to draw and start firing.

1769272655020.png
 
It is easy enough to reverse as well. As I said, one law, employing illegal immigrants results in jail time.
As it happens, already in place.

Passed in 1986, so 30 years before Trump was elected. That's the 30 years I refer to in which the political establishments had a chance to enforce laws if they didn't want voters to choose someone else to do it. Upon their heads, be it.
 
Shooter was still putting rounds into the body when it was limp and still on the ground.
It is tragic that neither courts, congress, nor the American population as a collective ground this trajectory to a halt sooner.
 
Remember, ICE was shooting people in cars and on the ground under Biden as well.

It's all the same.
 
Shooter (first shot) is the one in the grey hood. Not exactly sure how they're going to justify this.

EDIT: You can see him draw (left side of the group) @ 0:17, leans around the guy in front of him to fire off the first shot which then causes a few of the others to draw and start firing.

View attachment 98020

Shooter was still putting rounds into the body when it was limp and still on the ground.
It is tragic that neither courts, congress, nor the American population as a collective ground this trajectory to a halt sooner.

Tough to gauge. What did the officer see and react to? It had a look and feel to me of the officer perceived that the subject was accessing a gun and reacted to that. Any subsequent shots would have to be justified; if the person had and was still holding a gun and the officer believed there was still a threat, that may be articulable and lawful.

I no longer give ICE/CBP benefit of the doubt; I will not assume it was a good shoot til proven so. I want to know what the evidence shows.

Looked like an absolute shitshow of a ground fight. I want to know what kind of training those officers had. With that said, a subject proned on the ground who really wants to get their hands under them and access something is hard to stop from doing so.

EDIT TO ADD: Another quick rewatch on a small phone screen, even if he was armed those last 4-5 shots will be tough to justify.
 
@brihard

DHS is claiming because the person was armed with a weapon. Coincidentally you can also see before the shooting starts the guy in a baseball cap with a grey jacked over his vest begins running away with what is believed to be the weapon, he did not have anything in his hands prior to running up (also in the video).

So it's possible they panicked upon hearing "he has a gun".

6 weeks or less in training might actually be a really bad idea.
 
@brihard

DHS is claiming because the person was armed with a weapon. Coincidentally you can also see before the shooting starts the guy in a baseball cap with a grey jacked over his vest begins running away with what is believed to be the weapon, he did not have anything in his hands prior to running up (also in the video).

So it's possible they panicked upon hearing "he has a gun".

6 weeks or less in training might actually be a really bad idea.
DHS claims lots of things. While the subject having a gun would be consistent with what we see, if DHS said “it’s currently winter” I’d be checking the calendar myself and then asking my wife to do the same.

They have posted a photo of a gun that would be a bit of an unusual choice for a street gun- clean looking Sig, with a Sig branded red dor sight, and visible serial number.
 
I am so perplexed a nation that has developed so much technology - albeit with our help, and Japan's and other nations - produce such a poor law enforcement model in ICE. Horrendous.
 
Never a good sign.

The agent, Tracee Mergen, left her job as a supervisor in the F.B.I.’s Minneapolis field office after bureau leadership in Washington pressured her to discontinue a civil rights inquiry into the immigration officer, Jonathan Ross, according to one of the people. Such inquiries are a common investigative step in similar shootings.

Archive
 
buddy gets icecuted right in front of a donut shop (Glam Donuts). Choose your place of resistance wisely.
 
Back
Top