• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Alberta government thread

Absolutely, I wonder if it would also violate the charter is some way?
It’s certainly a violation of section 2; it would be a matter of whether it’s saved by section 1. I suspect not, personally. Clearly the real intent is to prevent a reclaiming of the abandoned “progressive conservative” label. The rest is window dressing.
 
Not paying for new judges while complaining about crime is certainly a choice…

I'm still trying to figure out what these legal traditions are.

Smith says the collaboration would help ensure the appointments “appropriately reflect Alberta’s distinct legal traditions,” and strengthen public confidence in the administration of justice.
 
I'm still trying to figure out what these legal traditions are.
 
I'm still trying to figure out what these legal traditions are.
The most cited decisions out of Alberta (which can be a useful metric for any here the influential case law is to be found) tend to focus on administrative sanctions for impaired drivers, oil and gas, and sovereign citizens. Not sure that’s enough of a ‘distinct legal tradition’ to claim any special additional role in the appointment of superior court judges.

 
Using radically different timeframes for comparison makes it unserious.
I've found that there are two Fraser Institutes.

One turns out insightful well researched papers that are worth your time. These are generally at least co-authored by the senior fellows that have serious experience (if not ongoing employment) in the academic or private sectors.

One turns out specious paint by numbers trash that collapse under the lightest of informed scrutiny. These are authored by their content farm of on payroll staff "analysts"
 
oops... too heavily reliant on oil again


Economists unsurprised by big Alberta deficit given low prices for oil

Alberta’s budget for the coming fiscal year, which carries a $9.4-billion deficit, comes as little surprise to economists as the province continues to count on oil revenues to balance the books.

The deficit is the largest since the COVID-19 pandemic.

Finance Minister Nate Horner said Thursday that costs associated with supporting a population that grew over the last few years, along with low oil prices and global economic uncertainty, are affecting provincial coffers, but that the government needs to spend to bolster core services such as health care and education.

Horner’s forecast calls for deficits over the next three fiscal years: $9.4 billion in 2026-27, $7.6 billion in 2027-28 and $6.9 billion in 2028-29, while posting a $4.1-billion deficit for the current fiscal year ending in March

 
Back
Top