MilEME09
Army.ca Fixture
- Reaction score
- 6,955
- Points
- 1,210
Absolutely, I wonder if it would also violate the charter is some way?
Alberta government thread
- Thread starter MilEME09
- Start date
It’s certainly a violation of section 2; it would be a matter of whether it’s saved by section 1. I suspect not, personally. Clearly the real intent is to prevent a reclaiming of the abandoned “progressive conservative” label. The rest is window dressing.
HavokFour
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 2,481
- Points
- 1,040
Try not to act like the thing you've been called challenge: Impossible
globalnews.ca
Danielle Smith says Alberta will withhold funding for judges without more input on selection | Globalnews.ca
Premier Danielle Smith said her government will withhold funds for new judicial appointments in Alberta if the federal government doesn't give the province a say on who is picked.
globalnews.ca
Not paying for new judges while complaining about crime is certainly a choice…Try not to act like the thing you've been called challenge: Impossible
Danielle Smith says Alberta will withhold funding for judges without more input on selection | Globalnews.ca
Premier Danielle Smith said her government will withhold funds for new judicial appointments in Alberta if the federal government doesn't give the province a say on who is picked.
HavokFour
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 2,481
- Points
- 1,040
- Reaction score
- 6,251
- Points
- 1,160
GK .Dundas
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 2,584
- Points
- 960
I'm sorry but corruption and incompetence are supposed to be bugs in the system not a feature.
The most cited decisions out of Alberta (which can be a useful metric for any here the influential case law is to be found) tend to focus on administrative sanctions for impaired drivers, oil and gas, and sovereign citizens. Not sure that’s enough of a ‘distinct legal tradition’ to claim any special additional role in the appointment of superior court judges.
Similar threads
