• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

All Things AB Separatism (split fm Liberal Minority Government 2025 - ???)

And as someone selling himself as "championing First Nations' Rights" in his x.com profile...
View attachment 98063
... wonder how all those FN clients he's been championing for would have to say?
None which is part of his ethics hearing with the AB law society.

 
I really don't think that Alberta (or Sask.) have the ability to "separate" from Canada, in that they weren't separate self governing colonies that decided to join Confederation. They were both create by acts of Parliament in 1905. The area between Ontario and BC became part of Canada in 1870 when it was sold to Canada by HBC (and NW Co.). At that time the Red River colony was made into the province of Manitoba (much smaller than it is now) and the rest was divided into territorial districts. When the population grew enough, there was talk of provincehood, and there were proposals on how many provinces would be made out of the area between Manitoba and BC. The territorial premier championed the "One Big Province" idea, but there were proposals of 2, 3, and 4 provinces as well. The Laurier government decided to ignore these proposals and divided the area roughly in half and picked two out of the 4 district names; Alberta and Saskatchewan for the new provinces.
Alberta would have to vote to "leave Confederation" for it to be a legitimate question, as they were never a separate self governing colony before then. If the vote were to succeed, the acts of Parliament that created both provinces (which were created at the same time) would have to be repealed and there would have to be discussions and voting on how to divided it with new provincial boundaries. Obviously, Alberta wouldn't be among the names for these new provinces and in the end, there would be no province of Alberta in Canada.
I doubt any of this will happen, but the government of Canada can't let the separatists set the rules for the vote. As stated before, Alberta never joined Canada when it became a province; this area was already a part of Canada and will remain so.
 
Even if we cant, the economic damage this will cause will harm AB and the country for a long time. Just like brexit and the Scottish independence movement was shown to have heavy help from Moscow, in sure this will too
 
Even if we cant, the economic damage this will cause will harm AB and the country for a long time. Just like brexit and the Scottish independence movement was shown to have heavy help from Moscow, in sure this will too
I just can’t see the majority of First Nations people ever agreeing to this…not that the Crown has treated them fairly. Would or could a secessionist Albertans take all the FN land regardless of how their people voted?
 
I just can’t see the majority of First Nations people ever agreeing to this…not that the Crown has treated them fairly. Would or could a secessionist Albertans take all the FN land regardless of how their people voted?
My opinion is no, and the FN and their lawyers seem to think so to. This would likely go to the supreme court to rule on.
 
I doubt any of this will happen, but the government of Canada can't let the separatists set the rules for the vote. As stated before, Alberta never joined Canada when it became a province; this area was already a part of Canada and will remain so.
People sufficiently committed to exercise self-determination - anywhere - don't have to do it by whatever laws others imagine they must. Remember that negotiated solutions aren't the only ones.
 
People sufficiently committed to exercise self-determination - anywhere - don't have to do it by whatever laws others imagine they must. Remember that negotiated solutions aren't the only ones.
Same goes for the First Nations, too.

Careful what you wish for, separatists, when you say “we don’t need to follow anyone else’s rules.”
 
People sufficiently committed to exercise self-determination - anywhere - don't have to do it by whatever laws others imagine they must. Remember that negotiated solutions aren't the only ones.
Somehow I would be surprised if a couple idiots tried a more radical approach. Which would potentially be treason.
 
Back
Top