• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

All Things AB Separatism (split fm Liberal Minority Government 2025 - ???)

A payroll tax is something a company pays when the payroll is over a certain amount per year. We have one here in Mb.
I stand to be corrected .

Manitoba is one of five provinces.

HEALTH TAXES/LEVIES
Five jurisdictions impose employer paid health taxes or levies on assessable remuneration paid to
employees, which are included in the previously mentioned employer taxes.

BRITISH COLUMBIA EMPLOYER HEALTH TAX (BCEHT)
EHT is applied to remuneration paid to an employee who either:
• reports to work at a physical establishment of the employer in British Columbia;
• is attached to an establishment of the employer in British Columbia; or
• does not report to work at an establishment of the employer but is paid from or through an
establishment in British Columbia.

MANITOBA HEALTH AND POST SECONDARY EDUCATION TAX LEVY (HE LEVY)
The HE Levy is applied to remuneration paid to an employee who:
• reports to work at a permanent establishment of the employer in Manitoba; and/or
• is not required to report to work at a permanent establishment of the employer but is paid from or
through a Manitoba permanent establishment.

NEWFOUNDLAND HEALTH AND POST SECONDARY EDUCATION TAX
(HAPSET)
HAPSET is applied to remuneration paid or credited to or on behalf of each employee who
reports for work to or who is paid by an employer through an establishment in the province of
Newfoundland and Labrador.

ONTARIO EMPLOYER HEALTH TAX (EHT)
EHT is applied to remuneration paid to an employee who either:
• reports to work at a physical establishment of the employer in Ontario;
• is attached to an establishment of the employer in Ontario; or
• does not report to work at an establishment of the employer but is paid from or through an
establishment in Ontario.

QUEBEC HEALTH SERVICES FUND (QHSF)
QHSF is applied to remuneration paid to an employee who:
• reports to work at a physical establishment of the employer in Quebec; or
• does not report to a physical establishment but is paid from an establishment in Quebec.
 
Survey says: "If it were possible, vast majority of Canadians would block QC (71%) or AB (79%) from separating"
Highlights (including how proud folks are - and have been over time - to be Canadian) ....
1771861568249.png
1771861589635.png
1771861373431.png
1771861426602.png
1771861474139.png
1771861509569.png
... and survey details:
1771861274077.png
Granular data attached.
 

Attachments

Survey says: "If it were possible, vast majority of Canadians would block QC (71%) or AB (79%) from separating"
Highlights (including how proud folks are - and have been over time - to be Canadian) ....
View attachment 98612
View attachment 98613
View attachment 98608
View attachment 98609
View attachment 98610
View attachment 98611
... and survey details:
View attachment 98607
Granular data attached.

Yikes.
 
I would block Alberta from separating if I was from the rest of Canada also. A significant amount of people from both Eastern and Western Canada make above average wages and take them home to spend in their local towns.
A large portion of goods travel through Ab on the way east or west to get to the markets required via trains and or trucks.
Fracturing a trade route and breaking up a country because the big boys and girls can't figure their crap out is sad. Those idiots in Ottawa better start actually doing something or they will cause even further divide across the country.
 
I was today years old when i learned that NFLD voted by referendum to join Canada or not in 1948. The join side narrowly won: 52.3% to 47.7%.

Interesting bit of precedence.
 
I was today years old when i learned that NFLD voted by referendum to join Canada or not in 1948. The join side narrowly won: 52.3% to 47.7%.

Interesting bit of precedence.

As there may be few, if any, Newfoundlanders still around who were of voting age when the 1948 referendums (yes, there were two referendums, June 3 and July 22 - Confederation didn't win in the first one) that addressed the question of Nfld's political future, the acrimony among the supporters of the three choices on the first ballot (Return to Responsible Government, Continue with Commission of Government, or Confederation with Canada) remains only in the history books or in family lore. My Grandfather (very much anti-Confederation and hater of any mention of Smallwood) occasionally related tales of the extent of that political anger, including one story about Smallwood that concluded with ". . . we had the rope over the lamp post and nearly got the noose around the little bastard's neck, but the police arrived and he got away".

If you are trying to find some comfortable comparison with a possible Alberta result, try looking at political shenanigans and corruption.
 
I think it’s attempt find a comfortable comparison with a possible Alberta joining the US scenario.

Alignment with the USA was also in the mix in Nfld after the war, though that option did not get on the referendum. Nfld had closer ties with the States than Canada back then. Even before the establishment of American bases during the war along with the many marriages of local gals to GIs, from the late 19th century up to the thirties, the United States was more likely to be the destination for Nflders leaving the Rock for economic reasons. However, the Truman administration was content with British (and Canadian) guarantees that whatever the result of a referendum, they could keep their bases. In a post-war US Army intelligence analysis of Nfld, the island nation/colony was very much unfavourably described and other than being a location for bases suggested that there was nothing there that should interest the Americans.
 
The NFLD example is indeed a sound comparison. A small majority decided the fate of the province through referendum. As uncomfortable as that may be for some, it’s an example from Canadian history.
 
Back
Top