• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

All Things AB Separatism (split fm Liberal Minority Government 2025 - ???)

Judge grants temporary injunction to stop signature collection on the petition to seperate from canada pending ruling.

Signature collection can continue but it cannot be certified or referred to cabinet. Judge said the delay will probably be approximately a month while consider and issuing a ruling on the actual application.
 
Of course its a minority but doesnt really help that after this court ruling some people on seperatist social media groups are calling for armed rebellion
 
Of course its a minority but doesnt really help that after this court ruling some people on seperatist social media groups are calling for armed rebellion
Then Insurrection Act it is and Treason won’t be just a insult word thrown around carelessly. It will have legal meaning and will result in people going to jail, basically forever.

See CCC 46(2)a


FAFO.
 
Then Insurrection Act it is and Treason won’t be just a insult word thrown around carelessly. It will have legal meaning and will result in people going to jail, basically forever.

See CCC 46(2)a


FAFO.
We don’t have an ‘insurrection act’, but we do have the crime of ‘sedition’, which covers advocating overthrow by force. Though I think it’s more likely that simpler and better understood terrorism charges would be more likely to be relied upon by police and crown in any such investigation.

But it’s wild that the conversation has even turned this way and that it’s actually because there might be a need to investigate these offences.
 
We don’t have an ‘insurrection act’, but we do have the crime of ‘sedition’, which covers advocating overthrow by force. Though I think it’s more likely that simpler and better understood terrorism charges would be more likely to be relied upon by police and crown in any such investigation.

But it’s wild that the conversation has even turned this way and that it’s actually because there might be a need to investigate these offences.
Thanks for the correction.

And if any serving CAF member is even obliquely associated with these people- watch out. A Court Martial would be the least of their worries.
 
How many Quebec separatists faced court martial charges in the CAF or were otherwise prosecuted in the 1970's? I know there were a couple, but they were few and far between.

Sedition is neither an absolute or strict liability offence, BTW. It's very high prosecutorial bar.
 
How many Quebec separatists faced court martial charges in the CAF or were otherwise prosecuted in the 1970's? I know there were a couple, but they were few and far between.

Sedition is neither an absolute or strict liability offence, BTW. It's very high prosecutorial bar.
Yup. I would not expect to see it prosecuted. Crowns don’t like unfamiliar or untested offences. In any viable sedition case there would likely be a gaggle of other, lesser, more easily proven offences.

Thanks for the correction.

And if any serving CAF member is even obliquely associated with these people- watch out. A Court Martial would be the least of their worries.

Definitely security clearance review for cause and likely loss of employment on those grounds.
 
Back
Top