Rath giving up on the vote already? Moving on to hijacking the UCP.
Certainly reads like a concession speech.
ALBERTA MEDIA ALERT
ALBERTA INDEPENDENCE HAS ALREADY WON! We have created a movement comprising hundreds of thousands of Albertans dedicated to Alberta taking her place among the community of nations as an Independent Country.
We have kept Alberta Independence in the national and international spotlight for over a year and a half while educating our fellow Albertans on the benefits of independence.
We have forced federal politicians to come to Alberta to help prove how Canadian federalism is failing Albertans.
We have forced a federalist provincial government to hold a vote on independence that will force a leadership change of the governing party of Alberta.
When hundreds of thousands of Albertans vote tomorrow for a binding vote on independence we will prove that we have created a political movement that will sustain itself until we achieve our goal of a free and independent Alberta.
The percentage vote is irrelevant because we have already won.
On Tuesday we move on to the next phase of our project. We dedicate ourselves and all of our volunteers to the replacement of the Federalist Smith as leader of the Alberta UCP. We will confirm that the UCP is Alberta’s leading Independence Party.
Regardless of the outcome tomorrow we have already won the first series of battles in the war for Alberta Independence. Please call all of your family and friends - make sure they all come out tomorrow to vote
I get the distinct impression that in spite whatever is obvious to anyone else. Even if they lose which is a pretty forgone conclusion that they will.
A disturbing number are going to see it as a case of voter fraud .
The eeeevvviilll liberals and the other traitors are of course behind their loss. After all any reasonable person would see that way ...
Rath and Co. already have set up their inevitable whining that the election was rigged, stolen, etc and now with him peddling conspiracies about Wainwright, there is a special place in hell for him, and I can't wait for him to disappear into irrelevance.
Rath and Co. already have set up their inevitable whining that the election was rigged, stolen, etc and now with him peddling conspiracies about Wainwright, there is a special place in hell for him, and I can't wait for him to disappear into irrelevance.
You know I was once at a corporate counsel dinner in Vancouver where he sat at the table beside us. I’ve come to regret not cutting his tongue out with my steak knife.
In all fairness, Jeffry Rath is the number one unintended advocacy AGAINST separation for Alberta. As soon as he speaks he comes across as bullish, obnoxious and irritating.
In all fairness, Jeffry Rath is the number one unintended advocacy AGAINST separation for Alberta. As soon as he speaks he comes across as bullish, obnoxious and irritating.
Itll be interesting to see what his "advocacy" looks like behind bars with the walls closing in around him. Their admissions theyre going to try and capture the UCP is disturbing and hopefully would lead to their collapse prior to them being able to cause damage.
Itll be interesting to see what his "advocacy" looks like behind bars with the walls closing in around him. Their admissions theyre going to try and capture the UCP is disturbing and hopefully would lead to their collapse prior to them being able to cause damage.
I could see the UCP fall to seperatists and all the non seperatists of the party move to the Tory party. Essentially the opposite of what happened to the Tories when they were the AB party.
The AB party kicked out their extremist ends who went to the wild rose and took it over. Who then merged with the ucp to become what it is. A right divorce is in order to reset things.
I'm shortly out the door on the way to the counting location. The Advance voting stations were an interesting experience, but starting later today (and scheduled until 0400hrs) will start to see the sausage having been made. I closely followed the rules for election officers with regards to showing preference to one side or the other, not making comments or (during the voting) not wearing colours or symbols that could indicate a political stand. One thing I will do, that "may" violate those rules will be to wear a "Poppy". I speculate that someone will ask why, since we are not in the poppy campaign time frame. My answer, of course, will be "Wainwright". Let's see if anyone objects.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.