• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

CAF Security Forces [Split from RCN Anti Drone Weapon]

Mind you if you add spiffy uniforms with white laces and ascots, who wouldn't want to be one.....

879310.jpg

Is that the new/old Canadian Regiment for Airfield Policing?
 
They can, and could change the vast majority of problems facing the CAF today; from procurement, to housing, to pay and allowances, to SLT and any number of things that piss us all off.

The issue: political will and desire to expend political capital on the CAF's betterment.

I don't count many governments in Canadian history, of any political stripe, that are willing to spend those votes on lil ol' CAF.

Policy is a great strawman that no one argues with.
We did, once. it began with a public and fairly well publicized policy statement in 1947 by the then Minister of External Affairs (foreign minister) and continued when he became prime minister. It was fiddled with - on anti-American and anti-nuclear grounds - but broadly supported by his Progressive Conservative successor. It was overturned circa 1970 by a new and radical Liberal regime.

BTW, in the 1950s and into the '60s we spent 4% of GDP on defence.
 
FWIW - it’s hidden in the DPU. 1 CAD Cmdr stated an increase has been authorized - but only after empty PYs are filled.

Can PYs be taken from trades or units with historical inabilities to fill positions and given to other units, i.e Air Operations Support, that could use them?
 
Can PYs be taken from trades or units with historical inabilities to fill positions and given to other units, i.e Air Operations Support, that could use them?
In theory, invest / divest decisions are informed by what the CAF requires. Challenges in recruiting and training then require CMP to come up with approaches to mitigate and address, and then CFRG and training institutions to implement.
 
Back
Top