Then you’ll be happy to know that tariffs on liquor will be but a fraction of a percent of the total tariff package. Maybe a market of 41 people with some of the cheapest shipping costs due to our shared transportation infrastructure won’t sting whatsoever. Maybe it will a bit, and will be a contributor to the much greater overall whole.Hitting liquor products is fly-swatting. If the liquor producers can easily find alternate markets, there isn't going to be any resulting political pressure that matters. Liquor producers aren't committed to expensive infrastructure. All they need is willing buyers and some sea-cans. This is a seen-to-be-doing-something, meat-for-the-masses ("we're hitting Red States!") futile gesture dreamed up by people with small imaginations and no strategic economic acumen.
Given Trump’s seemingly imminent global application of tariffs, those alternate demand markets may not be there to the degree you think they will- and you can bet other non-US producers will be keen to supply the unfilled demand and to develop new and potentially enduring customer relationships. There’s a lot of room for us to cooperate with other countries subjected to the belligerent tariffs for an across the board strike at certain U.S. industries. Canada is in a position, as one of the first countries to announce a strong response, to play a part in establishing a trend of common practices.
Trump is starting a trade war without allies, and may find his economy arrayed against a coalition of the willing-to-buy-elsewhere. The U.S. exports over $2t a year; about 7.5% of its GDP. Canada on its own has limited leverage. The rest of the world together has considerably more. You can absolutely bet that US adversaries like China will encourage such reprisal as a strategic weakening of America’s diplomatic and economic partnerships, and Trump is going to play right into that hand.