• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Canada moves to 2% GDP end of FY25/26 - PMMC

I suspect our relationship with China is more tainted, given the electoral issues, Winnipeg lab, etc.
Like I've said, its not a bed of roses with the US and the Chinese either.


A California mayor pleaded guilty to acting as an agent for China. Foreign policy experts aren’t surprised​



Secret police and propaganda: The Chinese agents spying on expats in US​

 
If this was last year sure, but the last several months we have been putting money where our mouth is, so the timing of these comments is odd for sure. One look at DLRs sharepoint and we can see a lot of projects happening now, and expensive ones at that. Starting next year, there will be major renewal in the CAF.

No. We haven't. We have continued to write promissory notes for delivery after Trump, and Vance/Rubio, leave office in the 2030s.

Other countries are building stuff, buying stuff, trying stuff. We are setting the conditions for eventually doing stuff.

We are moving at Canada's usual glacial pace. That pace is beloved of our bureaucrats and politicians because it allows them to believe "it will never happen" and they can continue with life as usual.

We are trying to get a 1,000,000 barrel a day pipeline to tidewater, 1200 km or so, by 2033, give or take. Presumably Ottawa is hoping both Smith and Eby will be gone, along with Trump and Carney.

Meanwhile AbuDhabi's CONDA initiated a 4 million barrel a day, 340 km, pipeline to bypass Hormuz, in late 2024. They expect to start punping in 2027. 2 to 3 years.

The same rationale goes into ships and planes. If they stretch it out long enough the demand signal will pass.

Chretien signed on to the F35 in 1997. 30 years ago. When Fly By Wire, which both permitted unstable designs to fly and made drones more practical, was in its infancy.

Our bureaucrats are masters of the dawdle.
 
We've already been stabbed in the back and in the front. How many more knives would be appropriate?

I am fully supportive of a greatly expanded CAF, I've never had any beef with that or concerns about it. I do believe in the mantra, 'Freedom isn't free.'

I'm all in on a CAF with north of 90+k for FT and another 50+k in PT members. If all of Trump's continued blathering results in this, great, tell him to keep flapping this gums.

Do you understand the difference bretween a goad and a knife? Both inflict injury. The goad isn't life threatening.
 
Your comments are noted. We are worrying too much, perhaps, on keeping our current members of the NSS occupied. As things stand, that really shouldn't be a problem nor does it require bringing another shipyard into the group although we do need that other yard. Consider, if we tell Irving to start building another type it they will have to expand drastically to achieve it; even if they are simply welding modules together. Once we get caught up on needs their output will be reduced to replacement/maintenance only which will reduce employment and start mothballing skills again. Better perhaps to identify what is wanted and go to VARD/Ontario Shipyards and say build me a fleet of these ASAP and no, you are not part of the NSS this is a one and done contract. Eventually we should be able to start a parallel build in Halifax but only after a couple of destroyers have been delivered.

We could demonstrate willing by making the ships we have ready for sea. By filling magazines. Buying missiles. Buying new technologies at scale and giving them a try.

These are the things our allies are doing. In the here and now.
 
First of all, and this will annoy the Elbows Uppers to no end …
If you need to start your post with a condescending swipe any person who may come to disagree with you, you maybe need to find a happy place and look after whatever is haunting you.
 
If you need to start your post with a condescending swipe any person who may come to disagree with you, you maybe need to find a happy place and look after whatever is haunting you.

I think HT was quoting the article. You should try reading shared articles before jumping to "butt hurt". More often than not, the information shared is relevant to one or anothers' position.
 
Back
Top