i am not pushing European solutions when I cite French institutions. Personally I consider them the anithesis of my desired endstate. I consider them to be authoritarian tools of an authoritarian style of government rooted in an oligarchy that cloaks its authority in expert tribunals while paying lip service to popular authority in the form of a parliament of unrepresentative representatives whose power is not supreme but curtailed.
When I promote European models such as the Danes, Swedes and Finns it is because I consider their societal choices more closely approximate the direction of travel indicated by the Magna Carta, the Petition of Right, Locke's Letter Concerning Toleration, the 1689 Bill of Rights and the US Declaration of Independence, Constitution and Bill of Rights. Those documents presupposed a powerful proletariat with agency. People in control of their own lives. People, armed, that took the time and effort to govern themselves and defend themselves. Not people who delegate their lives to experts and professionals.
They may die trying but at least they try.
The biggest issue is you miss the 150+ years of different history.
There hasn't been a significant war fought in North American since the Civil War down here (1812 wasn't a significant war in the sense of conflicts of the era).
Europeans have been fighting on that continent pretty much non stop, if not in their homes, then a neighbors... Even when WW2 ended, there where various terrorist and larger armed conflicts into the 70's, the breakup of the USSR may have curbed great power conflict - but the late 80's and early 90's also brought the breakup of Yugoslavia.
As a result Europeans are conditioned to accept a certain degree of infringement in their freedoms, and while Canadian's aren't as belligerent about freedoms are we are down here, there is no groundswell of support to adopt European like security apparatuses.
Some European countries have had some more pragmatic views of firearm ownership and training - but not out of a sense of freedom, solely as a defense against the USSR/Russian Federation (and the wannabe USSR2.0).
While I would argue that PET and his spawn have tried to crush gun rights (now mostly below European levels - only Britain (and Australia) has managed to crush that outright, and limit other Canadian Freedoms, they only partially have succeeded in removing the general desire of Canadians not be slaves to their governments.
Heck the CAF couldn't even save the DCRA and Civilian Marksmanship, and the Cadet Corps was watered down with no military weapon training. So before you are able to focus on a new security apparatus, you should probably focus on resuscitation of those that previously flourished.