• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Continental Defence Corvette

My guess is that we see CSC scalled back in number or the timeline "stretched out" and we start cranking these out. The 3x AEGIS capable CSC get built and then we start pumping out these puppies with CSC slowly trickling in.
Hope not. 15 seems to be the baseline minimum. The CDC/light frigate reflects a change in overall defence posture.
This also doesn’t include any of the potential uncrewed combatants, something I gather Australia will lead with first.
 
My understanding it that things have been pushed back a bit, but are intended to move forward soon(ish).
Yah I don't know the timings on the project. I know that TRAPS was trialed by HDW on their circumnavigation voyage, and of course was also trialed on the MCDV's first.
 
Sea Tracker…Traps…Cobra. I wonder how much of the cost of those technologies is due to the amount of time some poor buggers have to spend thinking up cute names.
 
So if the AOPS have a containerized towed array / sonobuoy processing capability, who would prosecute the threat? Are AOPS going to be carrying ASW helicopters when needed?
 
So if the AOPS have a containerized towed array / sonobuoy processing capability, who would prosecute the threat? Are AOPS going to be carrying ASW helicopters when needed?
Define the timeline of ‘when needed’
 
So if the AOPS have a containerized towed array / sonobuoy processing capability, who would prosecute the threat? Are AOPS going to be carrying ASW helicopters when needed?
TRAPS was built for and trialled on the Kingston Class originally. AOPS just used it once in the Arctic. I don't think there is a serious move to deploy this in the future. As for Cyclone full certification is progressing at a snails pace.
 
So if the AOPS have a containerized towed array / sonobuoy processing capability, who would prosecute the threat? Are AOPS going to be carrying ASW helicopters when needed?
Just because you detect a submarine doesn't mean its a threat.
 
Just because you detect a submarine doesn't mean its a threat.
Well yeah, obviously. But I mean is this something Canada would be considering employing in contexts where their may be a submarine threat where AOPS is working?

Obviously that’s super not ideal… But if a containerized capability is in service for use, I’m curious how that would integrate with the rest in the event that things go beyond simply collecting intelligence.
 
TRAPS was built for and trialled on the Kingston Class originally. AOPS just used it once in the Arctic. I don't think there is a serious move to deploy this in the future. As for Cyclone full certification is progressing at a snails pace.
Is the towed component useful for route surveys and detailed charting?
 
Back
Top