• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Election 2015

Status
Not open for further replies.
This report, from Army.ca member David Akin, which is reproduced under the Fair Dealing provisions of the Copyright Act from the Toronto Sun, could go in other threads, but I think it relates to 2015:

http://www.torontosun.com/2012/10/09/imf-gives-tories-enough-to-crow-about-on-economy
IMF gives Tories enough to crow about on economy

BY DAVID AKIN, PARLIAMENTARY BUREAU CHIEF

FIRST POSTED: TUESDAY, OCTOBER 09, 2012

OTTAWA - No Canadian prime minister likely ever had it as good as Stephen Harper on their first day in office when it came to the state of the federal government's finances or the country's economy.

In the winter of 2006, as Harper was being sworn in at Rideau Hall, the Canadian economy was positively humming along, and would post an annual growth rate of nearly 4% in the quarter in which Harper became the country's 22nd prime minister.

Meanwhile, the federal government's coffers were overflowing with cash. The previous Liberal governments of Jean Chretien and Paul Martin had done the heavy lifting of cleaning up the balance sheet and left Harper with a whopping $13.2-billion budgetary surplus — a fact the Harper gang only rarely acknowledges and then only grudgingly. In his first year as prime minister, Harper continued the Liberal tradition and registered a $13.7-billion surplus.

And then the world turned upside down.

By the middle of 2009, our economy was shrinking at an annual rate of nearly 4% a year. A year later, the Harper government — having, by this time, cut the GST by two points which starved Ottawa of about $15 billion a year in revenue — posted a record deficit of more than $55 billion.

The narrative for Harper's political opponents (and even some small-c conservatives) quickly became something along the lines of "Harper has squandered the good fortune given him and run up the country's biggest-ever deficits."

And yet, by accident or design, Canada under Harper has done measurably better than any of its peers since 2006. Comparatively speaking, we remain a fortunate nation.

Don't take my word for it: that's the verdict of the International Monetary Fund, which illustrates the point nicely in a small colourful chart on page 69 of its most recent Global Economic Outlook, published late Monday.

The chart tracks changes in gross domestic product — the total output of an economy — for Canada, the U.S., the U.K., Japan and the eurozone. Canada's line on the chart — the IMF did it in red which was a nice touch — trends higher than its peers from 2006 to the present.

This graph is one of the main reasons Conservatives can, with some justification, crow about their economic record.

1297323209783_ORIGINAL.jpg

From the Toronto Sun article

That is not to say everything the Harper gang did was right, but they did enough things right and got lucky enough the rest of the way.

In its 250-page survey of the world's economic prospects — exceedingly gloomy, I might add — the IMF has relatively good things to say about Canada's economic position. High levels of consumer debt and a housing market that's a little too hot in some parts of the country are cause for some concern but that's about it and, compared to the basket cases in Europe and elsewhere, Canada is the least of the IMF's or the world's problems.

But the IMF does have this line in its outlook which should give us all cause for pause: "Risks for a Serious Global Slowdown Are Alarmingly High."

And if it happens, the next slowdown could be way worse than 2009.

Is the Harper government ready for that or will it hope to get a little lucky again?

Finance Minister Jim Flaherty should be prepared to answer that question within weeks in his annual fall economic update.


My guess is that the IMF, relying upon Mark Carney for its assessment of Canada, is right ~ we are still in trouble, the Great Recession plods on with no end in sight. It is likely that, by 2014, Europe will have slipped back into a bread and deep recession dragging the US down with it, but not so deeply. Canada might just, barely manage to escape recession, in technical terms, but the ballot question will be:

[size=13pt]Which of these three men do you trust to manage Canada in tough, dangerous times?

HarperStephen_CPC.jpg
                         
MulcairThomasJ_NDP.jpg
                         
TrudeauJustin_Lib.jpg
 
Good article David - just the facts.

Good management and dumb luck, that's what we rely on in the military as well.
 
PM Harper and the CPC are probably enjoying the recent plethora of young Trudeau adoration in the press and will do nothing to stop the coronation of  Mr. Trudeau as the next LPC leader.

A revived Liberal party under Trudeau would be a frontal assault on critical NDP supporters.  PM Harper would enjoy Mulcair and Trudeau fighting over and splitting the Progressive/Environmentalist set and Mulcair's base in Quebec.

Who knows, maybe some of the next batch of brown envelopes will be from secret CPC accounts. Anything to help his opponents split the vote.
 
According to the fixed election law we go to the polls three years from today: 19 Oct 15.

That gives the Conservatives:

1. One more year (2013) to make deep, even savage cuts to spending - including defence spending;

2. One year (2014) to relax, crow about good fiscal management, bask in the glow of a (near) win in the deficit war, and focus on no-cost issues; and

3. One year (2015) to overspend while buying Canadians' votes.
 
NDP starts rolling out some trial balloons for a series of byelections. Hopefully they will use the time to refine and (hopefully) update their themes between now and 2015:

http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/10/21/mulcair-says-hes-ready-for-a-2015-warmup-as-harper-calls-three-byelections-for-late-november/

Mulcair says he’s ready for a 2015 warmup as Harper calls three byelections for late November

Murray Brewster, Canadian Press | Oct 21, 2012 5:31 PM ET
More from Canadian Press

THE CANADIAN PRESS/ Patrick Doyle; THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick"We're going to fight hard in all of these byelections. It's the only way I know how to do politics. I don't concede anything to an adversary — ever," Thomas Mulcair said Sunday.
  Twitter Google+ LinkedIn Email Comments More
OTTAWA — Prime Minister Stephen Harper called three federal byelections on Sunday, a move Opposition Leader Tom Mulcair says is an important warmup for the clash of visions he expects in the next general election.

The votes — in Victoria, Calgary-Centre and the Ontario riding of Durham — will be held Nov. 26 and have been called because MPs in each riding stepped down for various reasons.

The most high-profile vacancy in Durham, where former cabinet minister Bev Oda quit following controversy over her expenses, including an infamous $16 glass of orange juice.

Related
Feud over Harper cuts escalates as watchdog takes his fight to court
John Ivison: Focus on Canadian economy may show Mulcair, Harper are more alike than they want to admit
New Democrat Denise Savoie resigned her Victoria seat for health reasons and long-time Conservative Lee Richardson quit in Calgary-Centre to work for Alberta Premier Alison Redford.

The call came just as Mulcair was attempting to rev up the NDP machine at a meeting of the party’s federal council, which is already plotting strategy for the next general election in 2015.

He found the timing of the prime minister’s announcement curious, given that the Supreme Court of Canada will rule this week on whether Conservative MP Ted Opitz will continue to serve as MP for Etobicoke Centre.

When Canadians go to the polls in 2015, for the first time in a very long time, they’ll have a clear choice between two parties with two clear visions for a our country’s future
“We were expecting the call soon, but we’re a little bit surprised,” Mulcair told reporters Sunday. “If he’d waited four days we could’ve at least had that information from the Supreme Court.”

Last spring, the Ontario Superior Court overturned Opitz’s win in the May 2, 2011 election after a legal challenge by former Liberal MP Borys Wrzesnewskyj, who argued Elections Canada workers counted at least 79 votes that couldn’t be validated. The Supreme Court will rule on Thursday and Wrzesnewskyj has been out knocking on doors preparing for what he expects will be a byelection.

Mulcair, who took over as NDP leader last March following the death of Jack Layton, said his party intends to turn each of the current byelections into a referendum on the Harper government’s record, even in the Conservative heartland of Calgary.

“We’re going to fight hard in all of these byelections. It’s the only way I know how to do politics. I don’t concede anything to an adversary — ever,” he said.

New Democrats say they’ve started their organizational spade work for 2015 and Mulcair used both the meeting and the byelections as a chance to frame the differences between his party and the Conservatives.

“When Canadians go to the polls in 2015, for the first time in a very long time, they’ll have a clear choice between two parties with two clear visions for a our country’s future,” he told delegates, adding later to reporters: “We’re already starting to see a choice and that’s what is going to be reflected in these three byelections.

Who releases such an important decision at midnight on a Friday? Someone who has something to hide and no way to explain it
In a bid to underscore the perceived differences, he attacked the Harper government for a lack of transparency on key decisions, such as the rejection of a $6 billion bid by Malaysia’s Petronas to take over Calgary natural gas producer Progress Energy Resources Corp.

The decision was released at 11:57 p.m. on Friday night.

“Who releases such an important decision at midnight on a Friday? Someone who has something to hide and no way to explain it,” he said.

Petronas will have the opportunity to refile its bid, but Industry Minister Christian Paradis has said the proposed investment as written was not likely to be of net benefit to the country.

New Democrat Murray Rankin, a B.C. lawyer who is running in the Victoria byelection, says the Harper government’s approach is making Canada “the Wal-Mart” of the natural resources sector.

He said people, particularly in B.C., don’t understand why the refining of resources can’t be done at home.

“We seem to be selling our resources out to the lowest bidder,” said Rankin. “People think that is just utter folly and they don’t understand why we aren’t capturing those jobs in Canada.”
 
Some polling on who Canadians who responded to Nanos Research respect on issues (more to come, by the looks of things):
In a recent Power & Politics/Nanos survey, Canadians had to pick which federal leader they trusted most on a series of issues. In all three cases, no leader was able to receive the trust of a majority of Canadians.

On negotiation of trade agreements, Stephen Harper was leading with 27.9 percent compared to 18.4 percent for his closest rival, Justin Trudeau.

In terms of spending tax dollars wisely, it was a close three-way race between Stephen Harper, Thomas Mulcair and Justin Trudeau (18.3%, 17.2% and 16.7% respectively).

Three in ten Canadians (31.4%) picked Elizabeth May to protect the environment; twice as many as Justin Trudeau (15.0%).

Methodology

Between October 13th and 14th, 2012, Nanos Research conducted a random representative online survey of 1,000 Canadians 18 years and older.

Of the following individuals, who do you trust most to:

Negotiate trade agreements

Stephen Harper: 27.9%
Daniel Paillé: 1.0%
Thomas Mulcair: 11.7%
Justin Trudeau: 18.4%
Elizabeth May: 3.5%
None of them: 16.6%
Unsure: 21.0%

Spend tax dollars wisely

Stephen Harper: 18.3%
Daniel Paillé: 1.1%
Thomas Mulcair: 17.2%
Justin Trudeau: 16.7%
Elizabeth May: 5.5%
None of them: 25.6%
Unsure: 15.7%

Protect the environment

Stephen Harper: 12.0%
Daniel Paillé: 1.2%
Thomas Mulcair: 8.3%
Justin Trudeau: 15.0%
Elizabeth May: 31.4%
None of them: 15.2%
Unsure: 17.0%

Feel free to forward this e-mail. Any use of the poll should identify the source as the latest “Nanos Survey”.
A smidge more detail in the attached news release.
 
Canadians had to pick which federal leader they trusted most on a series of issues.

I wasn't aware that Trudeau was the Liberal leader. Did I sleep through a convention?
 
ModlrMike said:
I wasn't aware that Trudeau was the Liberal leader. Did I sleep through a convention?

Regardless, you know you've got a credibility problem when the NDP is seen is a better steward of the public purse than you are.

The days of Paul Martin in Finance are long gone, apparently...
 
More on the "evolution" of the NDP. At least there is no official support from the party to this wingnut, but imagine the press if this had been an ex Reform Party MP. Thomas Mulcair needs to keep the ship steering in the same direction Jack Layton set, but as noted in the new thread, the CPC seems determined to push the NDP into a three way cage match with the Liberals and the BQ or possible successor party:

http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2012/10/23/matt-gurney-son-of-detained-mp-misses-the-old-always-lose-ndp/

Matt Gurney: Son of detained MP misses the old, always-lose NDP

Matt Gurney | Oct 23, 2012 11:27 AM ET
More from Matt Gurney | @mattgurney

REUTERS/Amir Cohen The Estelle is escorted to Ashdod port in southern Israel after it was seized by the Israeli navy October 20

Over the weekend, the Israeli military intercepted a boat, the Estelle, carrying supplies bound for Hamas-controlled Gaza. Israel has maintained a total blockade of Gaza’s sea approaches, and northern land access points, since Hamas seized control of the territory in 2007. Israel sends in thousands of tonnes of humanitarian supplies every day, but doesn’t permit weapons or anything that could be used as a weapon to enter. And that includes stopping vessels from abroad from reaching Gazan ports.

The legality of the blockade is unclear, and hotly contested. But the blockade, particularly the naval component, as become a rallying cause for pro-Palestinian (or anti-Israeli, if you prefer) activists from around the world. Every so often, a group of them will get together and try to run the blockade. The boat intercepted on Saturday contained a former NDP MP. He was detained and has been receiving medical care. He will likely be expelled from Israel this week. Entirely correct behaviour on Israel’s part. With no real grounds to object to Israel’s treatment of his father, his son is now lashing out at the party he dedicated his life to.

Interviewed by the Vancouver Sun, Paul Manly, son of former MP and current Israeli prisoner Jim Manly, bemoaned the current weak position the federal NDP takes on Israel-Palestinian issues. “The NDP and the (Co-operative Commonwealth Federation) before it took unpopular positions,” he told the Sun. “They took unpopular stands. And now I think they’re being very cautious, and obviously the new leader has his opinions and policies on Palestine and so, you know, my own MP — my father’s MP — wouldn’t speak out publicly this weekend.”

“So yeah, I’m disappointed.”

OK. So a die-hard lefty misses the old NDP. That’s not surprising. Starting under Jack Layton and continuing since under Thomas Mulcair, the federal NDP moderated itself significantly. It made a conscious and strategic choice to move into the centre. It still has some uncontrollable bozos who erupt regularly — I’m looking at you, Pat Martin — but overall, the NDP has taken a similar path to success the the Tories did under Stephen Harper. Crack down on the ideological warriors. Develop policies that appeal broadly to voters and roll with them. Don’t provoke unnecessary fights on fringe issues that will needlessly polarize the voters. In short, don’t give moderates a reason to vote against you.

It’s undeniable that that’s left a few more fringe players — the kind of guys who decide to go run an Israeli naval blockade, just to pluck an example out of thin air — out on their lonesome. But while Manly the Younger has been stewing in his disappointment and grumbling about how centrist and moderate the NDP have become, you know what else it became? The official opposition.

The party’s stance on Israel isn’t likely to be a big part of that. Israel is a passionate issue for many Canadians, but doesn’t move a lot of votes outside specific ethnic communities and a few thousand highly vocal supporters on each side. But the NDP’s progress on the issue — sorry, I mean evolution — is still commendable. What Paul Manly decries as a muzzling of such moderate voices as Libby Davies is, in fact, a necessary step in the party’s growth. Fringe parties can give rein to fringe opinions. Professional outfits must reflect Canada’s reality — the fate of Israel and/or Palestine isn’t a top-of-mind issue in Canadian daily life.

A moderate position isn’t just good politics, it reflects reality. In a situation as messy as that one, neither side will be blameless. Personalyl, I don’t think Israel needs to be perfect to be right. There are fair grounds to criticize some of its actions, but that criticism should be pragmatic and mindful of Israel’s very real, very pressing, security concerns. The humanitarian plight of some Palestinians is unfortunate, but it’s not Israel’s job to fix it at the expense of its own people’s security. Everyone wants a solution, but we won’t get there by pretending that one side must do everything while the other benefits.

The NDP doesn’t need to come around to be as pro-Israel as I. It’s doing what it needs to do already — moderate its message on the issue, clamp down on the bozo eruptions and focus on the middle ground of Canadian domestic politics. Old-time political warriors like the Manly’s might not like what’s become of their party. But if they miss losing so much, they should feel free to run in the next election under the Canadians for Gaza party banner. They’ll get their fix of election-losing nostalgia real quick.

National Post
mgurney@nationalpost.com
 
Shades of Jean Chrétien's 1993 promise to renegotiate NAFTA! The Toronto Star reports that "Thomas Mulcair threatens to roll back Canada-China investment protection agreement".

The Star quotes Mr. Mulcair as saying, "You can sign into an agreement and then you can remove yourself from the agreement. That’s what successive governments can do. And what we’re signalling clearly is that we’re not going to be bound for the next 30 years by an agreement that hasn’t even been studied, that would make our court system take the interests of foreign investors and foreign companies pass above the interests of Canadians, the interests of our environment, the interests of our rights.” But, the Star notes that he did not explain what legal mechanism he could use to renege on Canada's commitments.

Please remember that Chrétien's promises (renegotiate NAFTA, replace GST, no helicopters) were very popular and contributed (along with the collapse division of the right) to his lopsided election win. Canadian tend to remember the short, sweet promise while not worrying about the "legal mechanisms."
 
Here, reproduced under the Fair Dealing provisions of the Copyright Act from the National Post, is a downright scary (suitable for Halloween) report on what might happen in 2015, if the results from some polls is a) believable and b) holds:

http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/10/30/trudeau-effect-with-justin-as-leader-liberals-would-win-majority-government-poll-finds/
‘Trudeau Effect’: With Justin as leader Liberals would win majority government, poll finds

Tristin Hopper

Oct 30, 2012

With Justin Trudeau at the helm, the Liberals could instantly bounce from political ignominy to a majority government if an election were held tomorrow, according to new Forum Research poll commissioned by the National Post.

“The ‘Trudeau Effect’ has proven itself as a real phenomenon, and it appears to be growing, not going away,” said Forum Research president Lorne Bozinoff.

In an election tomorrow, the Liberal party would capture a slim majority of 160 seats, pushing the Conservatives into Official Opposition with 104 seats and leaving the NDP in a distant third place with 42.

By contrast, if the Liberals entered an election with current leader Bob Rae in charge, they would remain in third place with only 76 seats.

“Interestingly, the Bloc Québécois take more seats if Justin Trudeau is NOT leader [eight seats] than they do if he is [one seat],” noted Forum research.

The poll, conducted on Oct. 27, surveyed 1,735 randomly selected residents of Canada aged 18 or older. The results are considered accurate plus or minus 2%, 19 times out of 20.

poll1.jpg

Infographic courtesey the National Post

Although Mr. Trudeau has been touted as the man who could mend Liberal relations with the West — due to his brief stint as a Vancouver secondary schoolteacher — the Prairies and British Columbia would remain the domain of the Tories and the NDP, according to the Forum poll, with the Liberals consolidating their historical base in Ontario, Quebec and Atlantic Canada.

Even before Mr. Trudeau had officially announced his candidacy in the April leadership vote, he had been buoyed by stunningly optimistic electoral forecasts.

On Sept. 28, four days before Mr. Trudeau kicked off his campaign, another National Post-commissioned Forum research poll predicted that the Papineau, Que., MP could lead the Liberals to power and take “the wind out of the NDP’s sails,” Mr. Bozinoff said at the time.

Later that week, the 40-year-old politician even received a semi-endorsement from his father’s former rival, Conservative ex-prime minister Brian Mulroney.

“I don’t approve of, and I don’t agree with, those who dismiss Justin Trudeau lightly,” he told the National Post editorial board.

Last week, a CROP poll for La Press showed a Trudeau-Liberal party regaining a dominance of Quebec not seen since the days of Justin’s father, prime minister Pierre Trudeau.

The Trudeau Liberals would pull ahead of the NDP to capture 36% of the vote and leave the Bloc languishing in near-irrelevance. CROP vice president Youri Rivest called it a “resurrection.”

Under current conditions, it would be difficult to imagine a Trudeau-led Liberal party not making some improvement upon the party’s history-making defeat in the 2011 election.

With Michael Ignatieff in command, the party captured an embarrassing 34 seats, marking the first time in Canadian history that a Liberal leader would not occupy either Stornoway or 24 Sussex.

On April 14, 2013, Liberals will gather in Ottawa to elect their next leader. Among the other declared contenders are Deborah Coyne, a former PMO staffer and mother of Mr. Trudeau’s half-sister, Vancouver lawyer Alex Burton and Toronto economist Jonathan Mousley.

Although senior Liberals have suggested Bank of Canada governor Mark Carney and Ontario premier Dalton McGuinty as potential competitors, both men have made official that they are not running.

National Post, with files from Kathryn Blaze Carlson

• Email: thopper@nationalpost.com | Twitter: TristinHopper


I guess the CPC attack ad machine is hard at work.

 
Crantor said:
Hmn.  I'm curious as to what the NDP will do...


My guess: it will follow the CPC with an all out, very negative, attack on M. Trudeau.
 
E.R. Campbell said:
‘Trudeau Effect’....

Although Mr. Trudeau has been touted as the man who could mend Liberal relations with the West — due to his brief stint as a Vancouver secondary schoolteacher
That's a pretty tenuous straw to clutch, which also ignores BC not being part of "the west" -- lotus land is on a separate planet.
 
True, but he has already put the issue of the West to rest more or less.  He premptively went out there to make peace.  A peace he really didn't have to make since he's being perceived as his father's son, but nonetheless did it to put that issue down.

In Quebec, where he might make some gains, he's already used the "Harper's Canada" bit which does not seem to have damaged him too much in the rest of Canada, but certainly made him look good in Quebec.  Stealing seats from the NDP will be key since he will need Quebec and Ontario to win his majority or huis minority for that matter.

Ontario will be the real battleground.  Everything will depend on how he is perceived there.  And if Ontario buys into the smear campaign or not.
 
E.R. Campbell said:
My guess: it will follow the CPC with an all out, very negative, attack on M. Trudeau.

This where it gets interesting because THAT would go against any legacy Jack Layton wanted to impart on his party. It will be interesting to see how a compromise on party values will play out.  I too think it will lead to them to negative ads because desperation can make people do things they wouldn't otherwise do.
 
They're only attack ads and smear campaigns when the other side is using them.
 
Bass ackwards said:
They're only attack ads and smear campaigns when the other side is using them.

There are 150 "long times" yet before the next election. I wouldn't get too excited just yet.
 
Crantor said:
True, but he has already put the issue of the West to rest more or less.  He premptively went out there to make peace.  A peace he really didn't have to make since he's being perceived as his father's son, but nonetheless did it to put that issue down.

Perhaps at rest in his mind, and at his peril. I highly doubt that most westerners actually believed anything he said as any more than some self serving agenda item.
 
Bass ackwards said:
They're only attack ads and smear campaigns when the other side is using them.

:off topic:  but this American TV ad is so brilliant that:

1. You need to see it; and

2. I really hope this fellow - and I don't know what part he represents - gets elected.


 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top