- Reaction score
- 21,964
- Points
- 1,360
Surely one wouldn’t wish to deny theatrics from all but the ruling party, no?The LPC was never going to agree to let the CPC tell them what to do. That motion was just as much theatrics on the CPC side.
Surely one wouldn’t wish to deny theatrics from all but the ruling party, no?The LPC was never going to agree to let the CPC tell them what to do. That motion was just as much theatrics on the CPC side.
I expect theatrics from both sides.Surely one wouldn’t wish to deny theatrics from all but the ruling party, no?
Glad it’s going down that way.This has to be the most peaceful dismantling of a protest ever. Some of the protesters are standing their ground, not acting violent but not cooperating. I haven't see the police crack skulls yet, just removing people here and there.
I do hear the government of the day referring to this as a "siege" on CPAC... I believe "insurrection" has been tossed around by some key Trudeau folks also.
Lessons learned. Besides, there are kids in the mix. No doubt some would be happy to see a mellee but the slow steady push works better and gives protesters a chance to leave (and it seems many are). I notice that both here and Windsor that the Public Order folks are not in 'hard tac' (helmets, batons, shields, etc.). No doubt at hand nearby, in case.This has to be the most peaceful dismantling of a protest ever. Some of the protesters are standing their ground, not acting violent but not cooperating. I haven't see the police crack skulls yet, just removing people here and there.
I do hear the government of the day referring to this as a "siege" on CPAC... I believe "insurrection" has been tossed around by some key Trudeau folks also.
Lessons learned and I would suggest an unwillingness to be violent with police for most of the protestors (remember these are mostly blue collar people who generally support the police, not professional protestors or lowlifes). The police know this and is probably why they are not in hard tac.Lessons learned. Besides, there are kids in the mix. No doubt some would be happy to see a mellee but the slow steady push works better and gives protesters leave (and it seems many are). I notice that both here and Windsor that the Public Order folks are not in 'hard tac' (helmets, batons, shields, etc.). No doubt at hand nearby, in case.
Agree. No doubt there are a few 'pros' in there. I have heard that some of the residents and business owners in the area are unhappy that protesters are being allowed to leave. I understand the sentiment that they want everybody held accountable for their loss and disruption, over the past three weeks, but simple logistics alone would prevent that.Lessons learned and I would suggest an unwillingness to be violent with police for most of the protestors (remember these are mostly blue collar people who generally support the police, not professional protestors or lowlifes). The police know this and is probably why they are not in hard tac.
referring to this as a "siege" on CPAC
Bang on. Everyone who doesn't live in Ottawa should not give the remotest resemblance of a shit about it.Person who does not live in Ottawa sympathizes with protesters
UXBRIDGE, ON - A non-Ottawa resident is calling on police to stop the removal of Freedom Convoy protesters currently occupying downtown Ottawa.thebeaverton.com
So me and G2G can keep sparring?Bang on. Everyone who doesn't live in Ottawa should not give the remotest resemblance of a shit about it.
Seems like someone else wants to get rid of the annoying parliament as well.We were on our way to that. But one side wanted to dissolve the government as well.
Nah. They never wanted parliament to go away. The manifesto called for the GG to make them the government. Trudeau can just turn it off at will. He might still need it at some point.Seems like someone else wants to get rid of the annoying parliament as well.
The actions of the Freedumb Convoy degrade their own argument (if you can even piece out what is, in fact, their point). It's intentionally capitalized to denote a proper name (like 'Dumbass Steve' would clearly refer to a specific individual named Steve, who is, by implication, a dumbass).When people use the term "freedumb" it really degrades their argument. You can disagree with the protest, but one should never trivialize freedom.