Future Armour

[KevinB]

Slovakia is looking at possibly getting the CV90120 to go with the CV9035's they've ordered.


I'm curious about their thinking here. What roles do they see the CV90120's doing in comparison to their older tanks? Intimate DFS for their CV9035's with the T-72's and Leopard 2A4's in support? Do they think that the older tanks are still viable/survivable on the modern battlefield? Why CV90120's instead of the K2's or Leopard 2A8's? Do they think the modern MBT's still aren't survivable in a drone environment so not worth the extra cost over the CV90120's?

I suspect that they are thinking for a Defensive mission that a 120mm is a 120mm, and are not as concerned about protection by using fixed fitting run up positions (possibly with OHP) - and able to get more bang for their buck.

 

[FJAG]

I suspect that they are thinking for a Defensive mission that a 120mm is a 120mm, and are not as concerned about protection by using fixed fitting run up positions (possibly with OHP) - and able to get more bang for their buck.

I think that's basically the nub behind the MBT v "light" wheeled or tracked tank debate.

If you want a versatile AFV that serve equally well in all roles in both defensive and offensive tactics, then you need an MBT.

OTOH, if you are looking at what is essentially a tank destroyer to be used primarily in the defense or on very limited offensive support roles, then the "light" tank is a cost-effective option.