• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

GBAD - The return of 'FOBS'


For our military bases? How about for civilian infrastructure and what role will 2nd Division play?
 
This one makes sense.

All under arty command.

Sgt Stout M-SHORADs integrated with Howitzers to keep the Howitzers in the fight.


Essentially the howitzers become fixed infrastructure defended by CUAS artillery netted in with external radars and intelligence.
 
The next step would be to replace the howitzers with SAMs, SSMs, BMAs and CPs.

A lot of Sgt Stout troops.
 

The video is probably best considered with the sound off and lots of pausing......

Observations

An amazing number of types of anti-aircraft systems grouped under one command - everything from M2s in Pickups and Quadcopter Interceptors through UAVs, ManPADS and Medium cannons to SHORAD SAMs. Presumably sectoral responsibility is more important than weapons type.

The operators seem to be older and well fed.

A couple of shots of the reloading operation of a multi-cell SAMs launcher.
 
And in the UK, the continued commercialization of defence.

In the North Atlantic the RN is hiring companies with sensor systems to keep them apprised of the situation.
The Army is hiring companies with sensor systems to keep them apprised of the UAS situation over its bases - a passive, non-deployable asset.

In both cases the effectors are considered separately and engagements are handled by the MOD.


 
Interesting concept from the Poles.

A system for launching Quadcopter Interceptors that puts it on a frame comparable to the C6 and the CG84. Bipod mounted, shoulder fired, line of site engagement.

Section or Platoon level.

 
A sense of the scale of the problem/opportunity


I am double posting this on the Ukrainian politics thread.
 
Moog RiWP turret for Boxer

4x Stinger 70mm
16x APKWS II 70mm
1x XM914 30x113mm
1x M240 7.62mm

 
NATO moving on from QRA aircraft.

"The revised framework includes

QRA fighter jets,
surface-based air defense systems,
counter-drone equipment such as mobile firing teams and helicopters,
and next-generation sensors

that individual allies are contributing for placement under NATO command."


Coming soon to NORAD?
 
IAMD/GBAD


"NATO has carried out a multinational air and missile defence exercise over Romania as the Alliance shifts from traditional air policing towards a broader system designed to counter aircraft, drones and cruise and ballistic missiles,​

"The Flexible Deterrent Option training on 9 September brought together fighter and tanker aircraft from France, Greece, Romania, Spain and Türkiye, alongside NATO Airborne Warning and Control System aircraft and a tanker from the Multinational MRTT Unit.

"The main focus was Integrated Air and Missile Defence, with the participating forces also conducting Close Air Support training with Romanian ground forces."

....

"The new framework is intended to cover threats including conventional aircraft, uncrewed aerial systems, cruise missiles and ballistic missiles, using sensors, command-and-control systems, fighters and other capabilities as parts of a single integrated network."

...

Blue Force

"NATO’s Combined Air Operations Centre at Torrejón in Spain oversaw the activity, providing operational-level command and control while coordinating aircraft and supporting capabilities across the exercise."

(Torrejon is 2500 km from Romania's Black Sea coast - equivalent to the distance from Winnipeg to the Atlantic).

...

Red Force

"NATO AWACS aircraft acted as the principal command-and-control element for the “Red” force, directing tanker aircraft and coordinating with Romanian forces on the ground."
 

General Dynamics will be displaying a pick-up truck mounted M-SHORAD system in Washington this month.

What I find particularly interesting is the palletized mounting system:
The company describes the system as built around a Self-Loading Equipment Dock, or SLED, a self-contained pallet that can be loaded onto different vehicles. It comes in light, medium and heavy variants that carry weapons and sensors on several types of remote weapon stations, which let crews aim and fire from inside or away from the vehicle.


General Dynamics said the system is meant to provide air defense for the U.S. Army’s Mobile Brigade Combat Team, works with the service’s command-and-control systems and can fight drones either on its own or as part of a wider network.

The design follows the path the U.S. Army set for Increment 4. The service first asked industry for ideas in May 2024, seeking air defense for dismounted troops that could fly on a C-130 transport, be dropped by parachute and be carried under a helicopter. In 2025, Army Chief of Staff Gen. Randy George approved the requirements document for the program.

At last year’s AUSA meeting, the Army’s air and missile defense requirements officer, Col. Marc Pelini, described the sled approach as a move away from a fully integrated vehicle toward a pallet that could go in the back of an Infantry Squad Vehicle, a Humvee, a Joint Light Tactical Vehicle or even a civilian-style pickup.

A follow-up U.S. Army request for information in March 2026 set out the requirements in more detail. The SLED must keep working when removed from its vehicle, and the vehicle must return to full use once the SLED comes off. The system is to counter small and medium drones, along with fixed-wing aircraft and helicopters supporting enemy ground troops.
 
Back
Top