• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

GBAD - The return of 'FOBS'


For our military bases? How about for civilian infrastructure and what role will 2nd Division play?
 
This one makes sense.

All under arty command.

Sgt Stout M-SHORADs integrated with Howitzers to keep the Howitzers in the fight.


Essentially the howitzers become fixed infrastructure defended by CUAS artillery netted in with external radars and intelligence.
 
The next step would be to replace the howitzers with SAMs, SSMs, BMAs and CPs.

A lot of Sgt Stout troops.
 

The video is probably best considered with the sound off and lots of pausing......

Observations

An amazing number of types of anti-aircraft systems grouped under one command - everything from M2s in Pickups and Quadcopter Interceptors through UAVs, ManPADS and Medium cannons to SHORAD SAMs. Presumably sectoral responsibility is more important than weapons type.

The operators seem to be older and well fed.

A couple of shots of the reloading operation of a multi-cell SAMs launcher.
 
And in the UK, the continued commercialization of defence.

In the North Atlantic the RN is hiring companies with sensor systems to keep them apprised of the situation.
The Army is hiring companies with sensor systems to keep them apprised of the UAS situation over its bases - a passive, non-deployable asset.

In both cases the effectors are considered separately and engagements are handled by the MOD.


 
Interesting concept from the Poles.

A system for launching Quadcopter Interceptors that puts it on a frame comparable to the C6 and the CG84. Bipod mounted, shoulder fired, line of site engagement.

Section or Platoon level.

 
A sense of the scale of the problem/opportunity


I am double posting this on the Ukrainian politics thread.
 
Back
Top