• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

GBAD - The return of 'FOBS'


For our military bases? How about for civilian infrastructure and what role will 2nd Division play?
 
This one makes sense.

All under arty command.

Sgt Stout M-SHORADs integrated with Howitzers to keep the Howitzers in the fight.


Essentially the howitzers become fixed infrastructure defended by CUAS artillery netted in with external radars and intelligence.
 
The next step would be to replace the howitzers with SAMs, SSMs, BMAs and CPs.

A lot of Sgt Stout troops.
 

The video is probably best considered with the sound off and lots of pausing......

Observations

An amazing number of types of anti-aircraft systems grouped under one command - everything from M2s in Pickups and Quadcopter Interceptors through UAVs, ManPADS and Medium cannons to SHORAD SAMs. Presumably sectoral responsibility is more important than weapons type.

The operators seem to be older and well fed.

A couple of shots of the reloading operation of a multi-cell SAMs launcher.
 
And in the UK, the continued commercialization of defence.

In the North Atlantic the RN is hiring companies with sensor systems to keep them apprised of the situation.
The Army is hiring companies with sensor systems to keep them apprised of the UAS situation over its bases - a passive, non-deployable asset.

In both cases the effectors are considered separately and engagements are handled by the MOD.


 
Interesting concept from the Poles.

A system for launching Quadcopter Interceptors that puts it on a frame comparable to the C6 and the CG84. Bipod mounted, shoulder fired, line of site engagement.

Section or Platoon level.

 
A sense of the scale of the problem/opportunity


I am double posting this on the Ukrainian politics thread.
 
Moog RiWP turret for Boxer

4x Stinger 70mm
16x APKWS II 70mm
1x XM914 30x113mm
1x M240 7.62mm

 
NATO moving on from QRA aircraft.

"The revised framework includes

QRA fighter jets,
surface-based air defense systems,
counter-drone equipment such as mobile firing teams and helicopters,
and next-generation sensors

that individual allies are contributing for placement under NATO command."


Coming soon to NORAD?
 
IAMD/GBAD


"NATO has carried out a multinational air and missile defence exercise over Romania as the Alliance shifts from traditional air policing towards a broader system designed to counter aircraft, drones and cruise and ballistic missiles,​

"The Flexible Deterrent Option training on 9 September brought together fighter and tanker aircraft from France, Greece, Romania, Spain and Türkiye, alongside NATO Airborne Warning and Control System aircraft and a tanker from the Multinational MRTT Unit.

"The main focus was Integrated Air and Missile Defence, with the participating forces also conducting Close Air Support training with Romanian ground forces."

....

"The new framework is intended to cover threats including conventional aircraft, uncrewed aerial systems, cruise missiles and ballistic missiles, using sensors, command-and-control systems, fighters and other capabilities as parts of a single integrated network."

...

Blue Force

"NATO’s Combined Air Operations Centre at Torrejón in Spain oversaw the activity, providing operational-level command and control while coordinating aircraft and supporting capabilities across the exercise."

(Torrejon is 2500 km from Romania's Black Sea coast - equivalent to the distance from Winnipeg to the Atlantic).

...

Red Force

"NATO AWACS aircraft acted as the principal command-and-control element for the “Red” force, directing tanker aircraft and coordinating with Romanian forces on the ground."
 
Back
Top