- Reaction score
- 6,145
- Points
- 1,260
Thucydides said:The resurgence of Russian power and the growth of Chinese power are alarming developments for the West (see A Grand Strategy for a divided America), particularly since these are autocratic powers which do not have a history of or respect for the triad of ideas that underpin our civilization: Freedom of expression, Property rights and Rule of Law.
They do have a great deal of respect for power: political, economic and military.
While in the long run there may be a time when China and Russia confront each other over the resources of Siberia, for now they are in an alliance of conveinience against America and the West. They happily provide nuclear fuel to our enemies, support anti western regimes and are now flexing their economic muscles (the cutting of natural gas supplies to the Ukraine and the implicit threat to Western Europe is a pretty blatent example). This is similar to the unholy marriage of conveinience between the Iranians, militant Wahhabi's and secular Ba'athists in the Middle East. Only the Americans can prevent these groups from becoming regional Hegemons, so the Americans have to be defeated first before they can get down to the serious business of killing each other....
The US "Grand Strategy" of building partnerships throughout Asia may take a beating over this incident, but since the US is in the Caucus, the 'Stans and Mongolia, they may still be holding high cards in the game. As an Oceanic Power, the US and the West as a whole does not "need" these areas, but having the ability to shape and broadly influence the region will pay off in the longer term (say +35 years from now after the Russian demographic crash), so maybe we are not taking a broad enough view of things here.
I reiterate my long held position that we have no fundamental dispute with China. It is not and is not going to become a friend but there is no reason to make it into an enemy.
Russia is another matter. Geography and petroleum make it a potential threat. Its own disposition (a cultural predisposition to “thuggishness,” perhaps?) reinforces its threatening potential.
China sees the same (geographic and petroleum) threats from Russia as we should.
With regard to the ‘Stans’: I say let China have ‘em, and good riddance. They are a festering sore, I think, collectively a ’pimple on the prick of progress’ as one of my favourite NCOs used to say about a half century in the past. I’m guessing that the Chinese find them terribly frustrating ‘clients’: expensive, corrupt, even by China’s lax standards, and administratively inept. Thucydides is right, “we” (the West) still have an essentially maritime strategy – a variant of the one Elizabeth I pioneered. We don’t need to ‘hold’ too much ground – especially not in hostile regions like Central Asia.
If China and Russia return, as I am certain they will, to their traditional enmity it cannot be anything but ‘good’ for us – in the near to mid term. But: If, at the end of the process, China acquires large, ‘domestic’ (formerly Russian) oil and natural gas reserves then we would not be quite so happy – unless the ‘petroleum age’ is near its end, anyway.