- Reaction score
- 22,384
- Points
- 1,260
I’m thinking that won’t work out very well for them.
Admittedly that would make things come full circle because the whole Desert One fiasco created JSOC, and Round 2 would be a whole lot different.
Hamas invaded Israel 2023
- Thread starter McG
- Start date
Admittedly that would make things come full circle because the whole Desert One fiasco created JSOC, and Round 2 would be a whole lot different.
- Reaction score
- 4,633
- Points
- 1,260
IRN info-machined that for you
gryphonv
Sr. Member
- Reaction score
- 338
- Points
- 780
I really believe US powers that be would love Iran to give them a reason to strike Iran or to open up a major campaign, I also think Iran knows this.
GR66
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 4,279
- Points
- 1,160
Sounds like perfect timing for the US to give Ukraine some Tomahawk missiles. Could score a trifecta while the Three Stooges are all together in one place.
- Reaction score
- 2,048
- Points
- 1,260
Hmmm, a new 'Axis of Evil'?
- Reaction score
- 22,384
- Points
- 1,260
We moved 2 Carriers, a Marine TF, and multiple squadrons of USAF aircraft into the area.
I believe that the Biden Admin has learned they looking weak or unprepared is an invitation for the enemy.
France is the one suggesting that we expand the Syrian mission to wipe out Hamas and their supporters (including Iran, and probably very clear to Russia that FAFO is getting close).
I don’t think that POTUS wants to expand the conflict, but limited strikes into Syria and Iran may be on the table if they don’t get the message.
Colin Parkinson
Army.ca Myth
- Reaction score
- 12,422
- Points
- 1,160
I commend the government spokeperson for being so blunt and determined
- Reaction score
- 2,048
- Points
- 1,260
What's the best guess on why France (Marcon) is suddenly so Hawkish? He's not up for re-election anytime soon and I'm sure French going balls to the wall on something like this would surely lead to internal attacks in France. What's his angle?
- Reaction score
- 22,885
- Points
- 1,360
Massive influx of Islamist violence that will make Algerian friction look like kindergarten recess…
gryphonv
Sr. Member
- Reaction score
- 338
- Points
- 780
I'm curious since UN is suppose to be open to all nations to participate in, even though it's on US soil, shouldn't the US have to allow politicians in to speak at the UN as their countries representative even if they are not on good terms with US?
I'm not in support of Iran, but I feel they should have the right to say what they want at the UN, as with any nation. If US had the power to vet every speaker there, wouldn't that kind of defeat the whole concept of the UN?
Brad Sallows
Army.ca Legend
- Reaction score
- 8,848
- Points
- 1,040
Hostages from Hamas to Iran for weapons; hostages from Iran to US for ransom.
gryphonv
Sr. Member
- Reaction score
- 338
- Points
- 780
Maybe more nuclear concessions. It's my fear.
Obviously only for domestic power production. /s
- Reaction score
- 22,384
- Points
- 1,260
We allow Nations to have permanent reps - but additional folks who want to speak are subject to us allowing them in.
- Reaction score
- 22,384
- Points
- 1,260
Yeah I just don’t see that one flying currently.
Maxman1
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 1,620
- Points
- 1,160
The MFO is in the Sinai and is unrelated to the UN, maybe their mandate could be expanded.
OldSolduer
Army.ca Relic
- Reaction score
- 16,157
- Points
- 1,260
The only thing flying should be outbound cruise missiles towards Iran. One missile on one target.
FOFA should be the message.
Eaglelord17
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 2,168
- Points
- 1,040
The concept of the UN is to protect the power structure at the end of WWII (hence the permanent security council members). Everything else they do is to pretend that it benefits other nations to make them a part of supporting those structures.
If it was truly about uniting everyone there would be no such thing as veto powers.
Similar threads
